@GiddyGap@lemm.ee to News@lemmy.world • 8 months agoRight turn on red? With pedestrian deaths rising, US cities are considering bansapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up1274cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1274external-linkRight turn on red? With pedestrian deaths rising, US cities are considering bansapnews.com@GiddyGap@lemm.ee to News@lemmy.world • 8 months agomessage-square102fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
minus-square@LordKitsuna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink10•8 months agoI think the point is that trying to ban right on red will change nothing because they will still just drive incorrectly turning right even if they shouldn’t they already weren’t supposed to be turning
minus-square@Repelle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•8 months agoThe ban is mostly followed in NYC, at least in Manhattan where I lived for 6 years.
minus-square@LordKitsuna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•8 months agoMaybe in some places but definitely not in seattle. I see people turn red at intersections very clearly marked no turn on red all the time
minus-squareDrusaslinkfedilink1•8 months agoI live in Seattle. That’s what I’m referring to. Most people do adhere to it, but it’s not that uncommon for people to violate it.
Yes, but that’s how people operate in reality.
I think the point is that trying to ban right on red will change nothing because they will still just drive incorrectly turning right even if they shouldn’t they already weren’t supposed to be turning
The ban is mostly followed in NYC, at least in Manhattan where I lived for 6 years.
Most people adhere to “no turn on red” signs.
Maybe in some places but definitely not in seattle. I see people turn red at intersections very clearly marked no turn on red all the time
I live in Seattle. That’s what I’m referring to. Most people do adhere to it, but it’s not that uncommon for people to violate it.
Removed by mod