• Wogi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 months ago

    You can debate the merits of some work, you can debate the amount people are compensated for that work. But what is absolutely not debatable is that we actually need people to do work for us to contribute to function as a society. Some of that work that’s absolutely necessary is both dangerous and nigh impossible to automate. Do we need another Starbucks? No, absolutely not. But we will still need places to be built, and infrastructure maintained. There’s really no escaping that.

    • AltheaHunter
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      11 months ago

      That’s why it’s a basic income. Enough to keep you housed, clothed and fed. Your clothes might be thrifted, your apartment small, and your diet mostly instant ramen, but your basic needs will be covered. Plenty of people would still work hard to get more than the basics.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why not just guarantee those things for everyone?

        Guaranteed housing, guaranteed food, guaranteed clothing. No work required. I agree with you, I think most people will still work with all of that taken care of. Because it’s just basic.

        • Infynis@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s what a universal basic income does. It’s way simpler and more likely to succeed than a hundred different programs for everything people need. Studies show that poor people, when given money, don’t misuse it, like some would have you believe. They use it on things they need, but otherwise couldn’t afford, like housing, healthcare, car repairs, things like that. It’s even good for the economy

          • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m sure there are already answers to this question l, but wouldn’t a basic universal income lead to some inflation/price rises?

            I live in the most expensive city in my country and rent is insane. It’s not about finding a cheaper apartment or a smaller one because there are none or you won’t get them. They are not taking in a family of three into less than a three room apartment and sometimes even three room apartments are considered too small for a family with one little kid. And to be clear, if you are long term unemployed, the government pays for your housing. Theoretically. You still have to find a suitable apartment and there.are.none.

            I would much rather have someone provide me guaranteed housing for free than to fear that my basic universal income will at some point not even be enough to cover my rent, even if it is just “basic”. But to me, “basic” in this sense would equal survival. It would mean housing, food, healthcare. I much rather take these things directly than make use of a small amount of money that will always be too little and end up having to choose between the cheapest cereal or the cheapest bread because I cannot afford both this month. Money and freedom to spend it as you wish is great, but I just cannot imagine how this would work. Apartments won’t magically keep their prices or appear out of thin air.

            I’m sorry if this comment is too focused on housing, it is just the most anxiety evoking example I have. (And also we are moving in two weeks so maybe I am a bit preoccupied.)

            • MNByChoice@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              I am sure there is an official answer, but I am going to wing it.

              Inflation is from too much money chasing too few goods.

              UBI will free you from having to live in a specific place. Or if not you, some of your neighbors.

              Guaranteed housing tends to be shitty. Think of the worst people running the program and them hitting the lowest standards most times.

              With money, you can decide the housing trade-offs. Save money on rent and spend more elsewhere, or the reverse. With money, you have flexibility.

              • Wogi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                11 months ago

                Guaranteed housing tends to be shitty.

                Except there’s no reason it needs to be.

                It can be good, and there are parts of the developed world where public housing is not only abundant, but decent. And it has a cooling effect on the housing market, making all housing more affordable for everyone.

                If we provide, decent, low cost housing to enough, everyone that needs housing prices to come down benefit.

      • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Who would work at Starbucks if you get a living wage making shitty art ?

        Is there even a quota needed in this? Can I make one piece of art a week that takes ten minutes and I get my living wage ?

        Why would I work 40 hours dealing with any customer. Why would I work in a field picking crops or at a construction site ?

        I’ll join hunter Biden making blow art and getting g paid

        • Tenniswaffles
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’ll increase demand, which should in theory increase wages for those jobs. A universal basic income is “basic” in the sense that it’s the minimum to survive in society. There will still be plenty of people who want more and are therefore willing to do those jobs.

          • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Except that people will only pay so much for a cup of coffee. So how much do you need to pay a retail employee to come back to work over what ubi pays and how much will the products rise in cost to off set that

            • Infynis@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              11 months ago

              Sounds like you just identified a business that shouldn’t exist. If a company can’t afford to pay people what they need to survive, and still make a profit, the company needs to change, or shut down. That’s supposed to be the essence of the free market

              • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                But it’s not a free market if the government is giving money to non workers.

                FYI this will effect all business across the board.

            • Garbanzo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              how much do you need to pay a retail employee to come back to work

              Probably a lot less than you’d think. With UBI there’s no need for a minimum wage so if you’re offering a great work environment you could pay next to nothing for labor. If the job that needs done is inherently shitty you might have to pay more, but that’s already how it is for quite a few things.

              • ascense@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                This, and also working part time would become a lot more feasible. I would imagine there would be quite a bit of pressure to improve working conditions as well, which wouldn’t exactly be a bad thing. A lot more hours would be spent on things people consider meaningful, and bullshit jobs would have to be compensated appropriately, which to me feels like a win for society collectively.

                One caveat though is that for abolishing minimum wages to be safe the UBI has to be high enough to be actually livable, and would likely be a target of constant politicking. A model I’ve been thinking about would be to set the level of UBI as a percentage of GDP, distributed evenly across the population, which to me would feel fair but may have practical issues I don’t see. It would create a sense of everyone benefiting from collective success, which appeals to me.

              • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                I think you will find that people will leave low end jobs in mass. Those willing to stay will ask for salaries that are extremely high and then those on ubi will be able to afford even less than before it existed

    • unoriginalsin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Afaraf
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      But what is absolutely not debatable is that we actually need people to do work for us

      Citation needed.

      to contribute to function as a society

      As if that’s a worthy goal.