@FUCKERM to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agoreminderlemmy.worldimagemessage-square157fedilinkarrow-up11.74K
arrow-up11.74Kimagereminderlemmy.world@FUCKERM to internet funeral@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square157fedilink
minus-square@null@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglish1•9 months agoLol that looks like 5 minutes of work to you?
minus-square@FooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•9 months agoNo, a study that studies way more than what I described doesn’t look like 5 minutes of work to me, why would it?
minus-square@FooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-29 months agoWhy would I? Why isn’t the study I’ve linked sufficient? Why do you want me to disprove something you should easily be able to prove, and that other people have already disproven?
minus-square@null@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglish1•9 months agoThe study you linked is behind a $40 paywall
minus-square@FooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•9 months ago Have you never heard of Sci-Hub or other services to circumvent such paywalls? As I said, more than enough people have made such studies. You could have easily figured out either of those if you were taking this conversation seriously. You obviously aren’t, so I’ll stop here.
Lol that looks like 5 minutes of work to you?
No, a study that studies way more than what I described doesn’t look like 5 minutes of work to me, why would it?
So you gonna spot me the $40?
Why would I? Why isn’t the study I’ve linked sufficient?
Why do you want me to disprove something you should easily be able to prove, and that other people have already disproven?
The study you linked is behind a $40 paywall
You could have easily figured out either of those if you were taking this conversation seriously. You obviously aren’t, so I’ll stop here.
So that’s a no on the $40?