• God
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 months ago

    But that’s not being anti, just accepting the possibility of it. Like i consider myself a libertarian and if you wanna make it close source, ok, I may dislike it but I won’t regulate against it. But being anti would imply I would go out of my way to censor your ability to do close source.

    • @lntl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 months ago

      It’s a GPL license thing. If you make a derivative work of GPL code, you’re NOT free to do what you want with it. This is where the 'anti come from.

      • God
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        Ah. Well I’m pro theft so just use it and close it if you want and pray for the best! Hide the evidence to not get sued.

        • @lntl@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          This happens from time to time. The offending party either removes the GPL code or they GPL the work. That’s life ;)

          • God
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            Why would they offend and then GPL

              • God
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                You don’t need to rewrite it though. Just keep it closed source and import / copy paste whatever you want into your repo.

                • @lntl@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  211 months ago

                  It’s may be possible to tell if there is GPL code included whether or not the source is reveal. A simple example is that some plain-text strings are visible in compiled binaries. In this way, poking around with a hexeditor may reveal strings which indicate part of the code is GPL.

                  • God
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    411 months ago

                    Hmmm. Thankfully I only develop small services and haven’t done any big monolith that people wanna audit. When I get to that point I’ll prolly get sued and then try to figure out what to do while profusely apologizing and denying at the same time.

      • @sydneybrokeit@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        There are two parts to this. On one side, you have the “please follow the GPL if you’re using GPL code” – which is really just asking someone to honor a contract, more or less.

        Then you have people like RMS, who believe that there should not be such a thing as proprietary software. They don’t care if you aren’t using the GPL – no software should be proprietary, period.

        • @lntl@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          I admire that RMS has a vision for the world and fights for it. World needs more people like this.