• gila
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3329 months ago

    Wait, but they already launched it without Denuvo. So pirates can easily crack the launch version without it, and only paying customers need to deal with the antipiracy bullshit? Nice, they took a pro-piracy hyperbole and made it actually real.

    • Veraxus
      link
      fedilink
      2359 months ago

      DRM ONLY ever affects paying customers, ergo DRM is always unethical malware.

      Also, let’s never forget how Ghostwire Tokyo had Denuvo patched IN over a year after release.

      • gila
        link
        fedilink
        English
        79 months ago

        Eh, I only meant hyperbole in terms of antipiracy affecting the pirates that had to figure out how to crack it. As a broad gesture at the fact piracy (consumption) depends on piracy (effort) to work

    • Julian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      789 months ago

      I’m thinking this too… like what’s even the point of using denuvo if it’s not applied day one? The whole point is to delay piracy so they sell more copies during launch week (in theory), so waiting until after day one completely ruins that since you can just pirate the easily cracked launch version.

    • circuitfarmer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      399 months ago

      That’s the thing: paying consumers always pay the price for DRM by having to jump through any hoops.