In a leaked memo, Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke put limits on employees having side hustles, saying Shopify requires ‘unshared attention’::Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke discourages employees from side hustles in company memo, saying their jobs require their undivided attention.

  • @lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    829 months ago

    One of my first companies put a clause in to say that they owned the code you wrote in your spare time. I peaced out too.

    • @JDubbleu@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      549 months ago

      So glad to live in California where that type of shit is explicitly illegal. Open source software would be so fucked with how much software is produced here.

        • @vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          239 months ago

          California has a lot of laws that stops corps from pulling shit, the corps usually leave it in their employee contracts as a scare tactic though. Non-competes for example are illegal, the reasoning os that most arguements for it are already covered by corporate espionage laws. It also fucks over the worker 9/10.

          • V H
            link
            fedilink
            English
            99 months ago

            In large part because at least some portion of California lawmakers knows their history well enough to be aware that all of Silicon Valley is a thing in the first place because people were able to leave and take their ideas with them and start something new.

            A huge portion of the value of Silicon Valley today can still be traced back to when the “Traitorous Eight” left Shockley Semiconductor to form Fairchild in 1957, and build tech based on what they’d learnt at Shockley, with many of them then going on to leave Fairchild and found further new companies. The outcome of that among many others resulted in both Intel and AMD, and the same pattern has repeated many times.

            • @vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              Makes sense, I wasnt actually aware of that. But then again im from the Inland Empire so the goings on of the coastal cities makes me want to lobotomize myself.

                • @vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  19 months ago

                  Most of us are chill with San Diego, its just LA and San Francisco that are annoying. LA cause they dont know how to drive and think their the only part of SoCal, and San Francisco cause of yuppies and being up their own ass.

    • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      279 months ago

      That’s meaningless if you don’t use their equipment to do it. If you make a sandwich, do they own it? A table? A child? A novel? A painting?

    • GreenBottles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      89 months ago

      that would never hold up in court I would imagine so long as you aren’t using company property to write the code

      • @lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        69 months ago

        I almost got into legal trouble by them when I left. Their contract also said I couldn’t work within 15 miles around any of their head offices in the world or any of their clients. They had hundreds of clients.

        So I left and I did apply to work for their clients and they told my employer that this was against my contract. The employer laughed and said this isn’t enforceable anywhere. However, when they passed it by their legal department they said that it isn’t worth a legal fight even though it’s easily winnable. Just asked me to wait a year.

      • V H
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        Depends on jurisdiction. Worth checking before taking any chances. Also worth considering that an employer willing to put that in the contract may well try to fire you and/or sue you if you come up with something valuable and they decide they want it, so even when you’re in the right it’s often not worth working for a company like that.

      • @lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        I’d be lying if I said I knew for sure.

        It was a software consulting place.

    • @ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      One of the companies I worked for put into their employment agreement language that stated they owned all the code I had written before starting work for them. It was the most hilarious overreach I’ve ever seen in an employment agreement - but then companies can put literally anything they want into the agreements, and they aren’t worth shit anyway.

      I told them this was utterly ridiculous and edited the agreement to remove this and some other nonsense before signing it, and they hired me anyway.

      • Dark Arc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        These are typically limited to business relevant intentions (e.g., in theory if you work for shopify you would be able to work on code for rocket powered roller skates but not anything related to commerce – this tends to be the extent of what’s legally enforceable anyways). I wouldn’t accept one that gobbles up any work that I do, too much red tape.

        Staying away from big companies typically makes this all easier, because in the worst case it ends up in court … and the mega corp may make an argument for way too many things and drag out the court to proceedings with a near infinite number of lawyers.

        Alternatively, live somewhere that forbids this stuff (I think California is included in that list).