• @NateNate60@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22810 months ago

    The legal grounds: The oil was shipped by a US company in violation of US law. American companies can’t do business with an organisation that the US government has designated as a terrorist organisation. Thus American authorities siezed the ship and its cargo.

    • @Lafuma300@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2610 months ago

      The legal grounds: it is ok when we do it. This is just old fashioned piracy, but of course you’ll try to justify it.

      • @NateNate60@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8510 months ago

        The ship was not intercepted by the Navy. They served a court order on the company and the company turned the ship back and its cargo was seized

        • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1310 months ago

          Yes. And were fined. But that’s perfunctory so that they can make more money smuggling oil. The sanctions are solely enforced by the U.S., without consent of the UN.

          • partial_accumen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8110 months ago

            Yes.

            Your own link argues against you:

            "But the Suez Rajan case was unique at the time of the transfer because it was owned by the Los Angeles-based private equity firm Oaktree Capital Management. "

            At the time the ship was being used for moving US sanctioned oil, it was own by a US company. That supports @NateNate60@lemmy.ml 's statements.

            • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              910 months ago

              That is correct and why they could prosecute this case. But they have been seizing oil since 2019. And even if all those tankers were partially owned by US companies, it still doesn’t change the fact that this amounts to piracy. Defending international injustice with legalese doesn’t absolve what this is. When China seizes our tankers because the parts were made in China, will you defend them?

              • partial_accumen
                link
                fedilink
                English
                49
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                And even if all those tankers were partially owned by US companies,

                If the tankers or company is operating in the US, then they are bound by US laws no matter where they are in the world. A company can’t benefit from the protection of the US government and laws at home only to go abroad to commit US crimes.

                • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  910 months ago

                  Many countries can use that justification. Why are you defending an act that you’d condemn if it was done to America?

                  • @TheFonz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    3510 months ago

                    You’re really committed to the act, even after multiple people have pointed out your error in reading this situation. Kudos to you I guess?

          • TheBlue22
            link
            fedilink
            English
            10
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I could not give less of a fuck what a people like you think or believe. Your “arguments” are born out of propaganda. Hell, half of your fucking posts I’ve seem were “this is written by a website based in a country I don’t like”, too bad truth is not written by propaganda websites you love to browse.

            Go back to hexbear, grad, or whatever shithole you crawled out of, degenerate tankie scum

      • @deft@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1110 months ago

        The contraband cargo is now the subject of a civil forfeiture action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The United States’ forfeiture complaint alleges that the oil aboard the vessel is subject to forfeiture based on U.S. terrorism and money laundering statutes.

        The complaint alleges a scheme involving multiple entities affiliated with Iran’s IRGC and the IRGC-Qods Force (IRGC-QF) to covertly sell and transport Iranian oil to a customer abroad. Participants in the scheme attempted to disguise the origin of the oil using ship-to-ship transfers, false automatic identification system reporting, falsified documents and other means. The complaint further alleges that the charterer of the vessel used the U.S. financial system to facilitate the transportation of Iranian oil

    • GodlessCommie
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      The worlds largest terrorist state gets to dictate who is terrorist?

      • @NateNate60@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yep. Anyone can do that, actually. I can declare you a terrorist. It’s totally my right to do so, but the question is–so what? What am I going to do about it?

        The US government has declared the Iranian organisation a terrorist organisation. What have they done about it?

        The amount of outrage on this thread is just ignorant people learning how international geopolitics and the concept of absolute state sovereignty work for the first time. Yes, it is the case that big countries get to stick their fingers into the business of little countries. Yes, it is unfair. But that’s how it is and that’s how it’s always gonna be for the foreseeable future. That’s how it always has been for all of human history. From Ur to Rome to Vienna to London to Washington. From Chang’an to Beijing to Nanjing to Tokyo and now back to Beijing. In the next century maybe it will be some other country kicking around everyone else instead of the US. But I can practically guarantee that there will be kicking and there will be people continuing to complain about how unfair it is, because it is and always has been.

        I’d like to say we should do better as a species, but in reality, what we have now is really fucking amazing compared to when Genghis Khan would come romping around town destroying your villages and murdering your people, or the Romans coming and demanding fifty talents of silver by sunset or else, or the Belgians planting rubber trees in your backyard.

    • Franzia
      link
      English
      1010 months ago

      I am proud that America is finally doing something about this illegal oil trade. We have always turned a blind eye, and now we are actually forcing our hand to keep Iran from becoming a potential world-ending regime with no human rights for Iranians.