@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldM to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months ago[meme] Transit alignment chartlemmy.worldimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1299file-text
arrow-up1299image[meme] Transit alignment chartlemmy.world@Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldM to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square34fedilinkfile-text
lawful good – grassy trams neutral good – bicycles chaotic good – rail bicycles lawful neutral – diesel trains true neutral – walking chaotic neutral – parkour lawful evil – airplanes neutral evil – Las Vegas Loop chaotic evil – rolling coal
minus-squareThe Snark UrgelinkfedilinkEnglish2•10 months agoYou’re right. For cars to make sense in financial terms, all we need is a mulligan on the last several decades of economic policy.
minus-square@Ilovethebomb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoDo you not have friends? Or luggage? Or a dog?
minus-square@Ilovethebomb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoThe difference in fuel use between a two wheel drive and AWD vehicle is negligible, you might as well have an AWD. Especially if you don’t commute in your own car.
minus-square@Ilovethebomb@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoYes, AWD would give you more traction, regardless of how much power is in front of the drive train.
![[meme] Transit alignment chart](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/6caaa958-a6b9-4ba5-bee1-9a986d9e8d7d.jpeg){kind=link}
Removed by mod
You’re right. For cars to make sense in financial terms, all we need is a mulligan on the last several decades of economic policy.
Do you not have friends? Or luggage? Or a dog?
Removed by mod
The difference in fuel use between a two wheel drive and AWD vehicle is negligible, you might as well have an AWD. Especially if you don’t commute in your own car.
Removed by mod
Yes, AWD would give you more traction, regardless of how much power is in front of the drive train.
Removed by mod