• DessertStorms
      link
      fedilink
      62
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Lmfao, this one man is hoarding enough money to solve world hunger 10 times over, and enough influence to change the entire way the world is run, but what he wants (and I know this because of his actions) is to never drop out of the top 5 richest people on the planet list.

      And he has you not only convinced that he gives a shit about anyone but himself, but so much so that you are willing to publicly lick his boot.

      Good to see the PR is serving its purpose I guess…

    • @31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      3110 months ago
      1. He made that money by stealing the surplus value of other people’s labor, which probably would’ve done much more good in the hands of the workers instead of being hoarded, as much of it is now.

      2. His business practices harmed consumers.

      3. His meddling in education has caused much harm.

      4. He met with Epstein many times, and probably committed statutory rape.

    • @paholg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2510 months ago

      Were he not evil, he never would have become a billionaire in the first place.

    • @Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      24
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Extend, Embrace, Extinguish

      he is literally one of the most deplorable people known to man and is the literal definition of a capitalist. Whitewashing, propaganda, proprietisation, he does all and everything detrimental to society

    • @zbyte64
      link
      English
      1610 months ago

      The dude single handily fucked the American education system by mainstreaming voucher schools. His “gifts to education” was a poison pill and that really does sum up the entirety of billionaire philanthropy.

    • darcy
      link
      fedilink
      1610 months ago

      looks like someone fell for the propaganda. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A GOOD BILLIONAIRE. which charity does he mainly donate to again? oh yeah, the one which his family controls. he has painted himself as a genuinely good person. idc how much he pledges to donate when he dies, if he still has the money now, he is evil.

    • WabiSabiPapi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      710 months ago

      imagine a society not dependent on individual charity (with wealth expropriated from the working class) for improving material wellbeing.

      does a ‘nice’ king justify monarchy?

        • @zbyte64
          link
          English
          110 months ago

          slightly less bad

          What is even the point of making that point though? Do we give him a cookie for being a “nice” exploiter?