Pupils will be banned from wearing abayas, loose-fitting full-length robes worn by some Muslim women, in France’s state-run schools, the education minister has said.

The rule will be applied as soon as the new school year starts on 4 September.

France has a strict ban on religious signs in state schools and government buildings, arguing that they violate secular laws.

Wearing a headscarf has been banned since 2004 in state-run schools.

  • @Kraivo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3410 months ago

    If it’s just an outfit and not religious clothes than there should be no problem, right?

    • @SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4710 months ago

      It’s still targeting ethnicities. There’s no denying that these bans have a racial component to it.

      • @maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1710 months ago

        I’d say it’s cultural rather than racial. Putting one culture above others is not the same as putting one race above others.

        • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Especially since one culture refuses to assimilate when they migrate to a new country. Yeah I’m an American, but if I moved to France or Japan I wouldn’t try to change the local culture, I’d try to fit in. If I visited Saudi Arabia, not that they’d let me, my pasty white ass is putting on a turban and some robes so that I don’t die of sun exposure. I’d be the first person in history to get a 4th degree sunburn. I’m not gonna wander around in short pants, and flip flops bare chested the way I could here in SoCal.

            • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              710 months ago

              Yeah. When you decide to join another culture, you don’t force yours on them. If your culture was so shitty that you had to flee to a different country, then maybe it was a shitty culture that shouldn’t be preserved

              • @TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                The majority of these people aren’t fleeing the culture, they’re fleeing the regimes. Wearing clothing that you wore your whole life isn’t “forcing” it on anyone, you are just being yourself. Would you tolerate a mostly-white school banning dashikis? What if the white principal said “Well the kid wearing it is getting bullied we’re trying to protect him!” Do you see how fucking backwards that is?

              • kase
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                How does the style of clothes you’re wearing force anything on anyone? It’s cool if you want to embrace the new culture, but you wouldn’t be hurting anyone if you didn’t. Besides, it’s not like you have to choose one or the other; assimilating doesn’t have to mean you give up everything pertaining to the culture you lived in before.

                Side note – shitty culture is far from the only reason for people to move. I’m no expert, but I’m guessing it’s not at the top of the list either, lol.

            • @duviobaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              It’s pretty simple. Give up your culture for another if the other is superior. If your culture is bigoted, for whatever reason, religious or not, give it up.

                • @duviobaz@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  I know what you assume, but lets ignore that, it’s nonsense anyways, stay with the point. You don’t think a progressive culture is to be prefered over one that is bigoted?

        • @TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Splitting hairs. It’s still bigotry. Just because it’s bigotry towards something real rather than something we pretend is real doesn’t really change much.

      • @Kraivo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1110 months ago

        It is not. It’s targeting religious signs. If your ethnicity can’t live with the same laws as others than it isn’t not you being ostracized, it’s you being dick by forcing everyone to follow your dogmas.

        • @SulaymanF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Not everyone who wears an abaya is religious or Muslim. And France doesn’t target religious signs equally, which is why the 2004 law banned hijab but allowed crosses.

          And if you’re mad that others have to somehow “cater to your dogmas,” someone should tell the French who visit Algeria and other middle eastern countries and demand wine and pork.

          • @Kraivo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            410 months ago

            Man, we are in the discussion where literally first post saying that French government preventing people from wearing crosses. What is the point of your argument, if you ignore information given to you by others?

            If a female goes to Saudi Arabia, she is forced to obey the laws of Saudi Arabia and cover parts of the body. If a female goes to France, why is it your problem that people should obey the laws of the France?

            You are insane.

            • @SulaymanF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              710 months ago

              The first post incorrectly repeated the talking point that crosses are also banned. That’s misleading. They banned “large” crosses and the 2004 law explicitly allowed “small” crosses, but made no similar exceptions for minority religions in France.

              You can’t have it both ways; either human rights apply worldwide or they don’t. If you believe that both Saudi and France have the right to take away rights for women, you’re the insane one not me.

    • @WorldWideLem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      810 months ago

      No problem meaning they shouldn’t care about not being able to wear it? Or that the French government shouldn’t care in the first place?