• VinceUnderReview
      link
      1211 months ago

      Ah yes, because humans never want to share information, or show others something they’ve achieved or created. The only possible motivation could be money.

      • @Ricaz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        That’s not what I’m saying, but these people choose to upload their content to YouTube specifically, so what’s your point?

        • VinceUnderReview
          link
          311 months ago

          That’s there’s not really another platform to upload to that you can easily share long form video content on, for free? I don’t understand your point now.

            • VinceUnderReview
              link
              111 months ago

              What? My initial point was people wanted to share things like information or creativity and youtube is one of the only viable places to upload too. I literally don’t understand your points.

    • @Fosheze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 months ago

      Yes but they can’t anyways because google never fixed their completely borked content ID system. Half the people I watch just assume that all of their videos will be demonitized anyways. They make all of their money off of patreon.

      • @Ricaz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        711 months ago

        I’m no Google fan, but it’s borderline impossible to moderate a site of that size. It’s a legal nightmare that cannot be solved by just humans. Read some articles about the human moderators of sites like YouTube and Facebook. Those people see some shit.

        But yes, YouTube should definitely improve their escalation system, and pay more attention to refuted strikes. It sucks to see innocent creators get punished by a broken system.

    • @iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      As a contributor who doesn’t monetize videos, you don’t speak for everyone.