Anyone else have a similar experience with one of these drives?

    • HeartyBeast
      link
      fedilink
      12811 months ago

      Someone didn’t read the story. This is about a known firmware fault that the company is doing its best not to keep quiet. Don’t help them in that work

        • HeartyBeast
          link
          fedilink
          6411 months ago

          There is absolutely nothing to say that the author didn’t have it backed up. He still lost 3TB of files from a new drive which was a replacement sent by the company, with a known fault supposedly fixed.

          “Herp derp he should have backed up” is not the takeaway here”

        • @ominouslemon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Still, if SSDs fail repeatedly, something’s not right. That’s the point of the article

        • harmonea
          link
          fedilink
          1711 months ago

          So because backups exist, everyone should be okay with buying bad hardware?

          I know you’re not actually saying that, but countering “this is a known firmware fault” with a reminder that backups should be done sure makes it look like you’re saying that. There’s still value in making sure consumers’ money goes to products that last.

          • PupBiru
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            i think it’s the “we just lost 3TB of data” part… either the headline is hyperbole, in which case screw the clickbaint… or they lost 3TB of data which is always a good time to remind people that cheap NAND flash is cheap NAND flash

      • @Serinus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1811 months ago

        The use case for these drives is always a single point of failure. It’s camera footage out in the field. You have to get it home before you have proper storage.

        Do you have a dashcam for your vehicle? Do you have backups before you get the footage home?