• @mahrimba@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    I’m super interested in running Linux, do you think it’s okay to just dump windows at once and go full Linux, or it’s better to dual boot for a while? I’ve read that dual-booting can be a bit finicky, but it’s been a while since I looked into it

    • aDogCalledSpot
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Dual booting isnt that finnicky. Just dual boot until youre certain that there’s nothing you need in your life that you cant get running under Linux. I dont understand why everyone wants you to switch so quickly when there is no harm in going at your own pace.

    • krimsonbun
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      When I switched to linux I originally intended to dualboot but I messed up the partitioning and completely obliterated windows. Decided to just go with it and I never looked back.

      • @neeeeDanke@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        for me it was the opposite, I did a fresh install and -against all advice- installed linux before windows.

        When a few months later a windows update dexided to fuck with and destroy grub again (and reinstall edge) I saw that as a sign to kick out windows.

        • @RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          From what I heard you have to use windows boot manager instead as windows just breaks grub whenever there’s an update. It broke my Fedora before but I didn’t get a chance to test it as I fully switched to nobara.

          Edit: @mahrimba@beehaw.org in case you want to try it out

    • @lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      You’re going to hear a lot of recommendations, but I strongly suggest going with Fedora for your first distro. It’s the least pain to get up and running with a modern, performant, up to date distro.

      Ubuntu these days is its own little corner of design choices, Arch is designed to need configuration, Debian is a (purposefully) a bit slow to keep up. A lot of people say good things about Linux Mint, haven’t used it myself but have used Fedora for years (including at work) and it’s rock solid without much faffing.

      • @mahrimba@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I’ve tried Ubuntu before but never stuck with it, maybe Fedora will grab my interest! Is it easy to customize? I’m mostly focused in art, web development and gaming, do you think it’s a good fit?

        • Another Catgirl
          link
          11 year ago

          those requirements seem to specify the desktop environment, which sounds like you’d want KDE or Xfce, for the customizable taskbars and for the window management shenanigans associated with gaming. (games often force window dimensions or force full-screen, which screws with Gnome Desktop somewhat.)

      • Another Catgirl
        link
        11 year ago

        I recommend Debian specifically because it’s slow to keep up, and most people just don’t need the latest features anyway. Especially if you’re new to Linux, stability is important.

        • @lotanis@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          It’s great for a server system but I find it less great for a desktop environment. Hardware support take longer to get to the kernel, UI improvements take longer to get to the desktop etc.

    • @jsnc
      link
      2
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @mahrimba@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        POP!_OS seems promising! It seems to be very easy to setup! Is it customizable enough? I’d like to try things out a bit, without worrying about screwing the entire system. Thanks for the recs! 💜

        • @jsnc
          link
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          deleted by creator

        • @magnificent_howl
          link
          English
          111 months ago

          POP’s default interface is fairly customizable. it’s essentially GNOME with a few extra enhancements, including the option of window tiling and a custom app launcher, so it’s extendable via GNOME’s quite mature extension system and customizable through GTK themes, cursor themes, etc.

          the thing about all linux distro is that if you hate the default desktop, you can just replace it with a different one. for example, im running pop on my laptop, and ive completely replaced GNOME with leftwm. you can make any distro act like any other, so as long as you’re not starting with gentoo or something like that, you shouldn’t really worry about picking the best one, especially when you haven’t experienced linux yet and don’t yet know what you find important in a distribution. personally, my only gripe with pop os is that i need the most up to date versions of packages for my workflow, and the pop os repositories are often out of date. that doesn’t necessarily mean that pop os is bad, mind you, it just means that for my use cases, i should get off my lazy ass and install arch lmao

    • @Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I use Arch (btw) and I can’t recommend this enough. But it might seem intimidating at first, so I recommend Manjaro, it’s like Arch but a bit friendlier to beginners