EDITOR’S NOTE: We want to acknowledge that, like many societal institutions, scientific and historical research often leaves trans, non-binary, and gender non-conforming people out, erasing o…

The word “hysteria” inherently evokes misogyny. Deriving from the Greek word for “uterus,” it was used in ancient Greece as a diagnostic label for women with symptoms ranging from dizziness to paralysis and menstrual pain—all of which were attributed to a “wandering womb.” Throughout history, the label was given to women who were perceived as unreasonably ambitious, attention-seeking, neurotic, or sexually dissatisfied. In Freudian times, it eventually evolved to refer to a mental disorder thought to primarily affect women, causing physical manifestations.

In an age of medical advancement and greater attention to gender equity, most of us would consider this gendered catch-all diagnosis for unexplained ailments to be unthinkable. But chronically ill people of marginalized gender identities, and just about anyone with a chronic health condition that disproportionately affects women, can attest that modern medicine hasn’t progressed as far beyond the hysteria diagnosis as one might expect.

  • FundMECFSResearchOPMEnglish
    10·
    11 days ago

    Thought this passage was especially well written

    These mislabellings are harmful, not because there is anything shameful about the possibility that someone could be living with a psychological condition. Rather, what is shameful is that women and other people of marginalized gender identities are still treated as unreliable reporters on our own bodies. It is harmful because this gendered misdiagnosis obstructs access to necessary medical care, disincentivizes biomedical research on certain diseases, and even prevents us from seeking support for comorbid mental health symptoms out of concern that doing so could further damage our credibility.