Navalny’s friends knew he was willing to become a martyr if that’s what it took to stand up to Putin.

Alexei Navalny’s long struggle against President Putin began with a humorous blog and culminated in repeated demonstrations of his willingness to risk his own life. According to the Russian authorities on Friday, he has now died in prison.

Russia’s leading opposition voice has been silenced.

Other dissident figures went into exile or died in mysterious circumstances over the past decade, leaving Navalny as the last national figure with a dedicated following.

Though he had been arrested many times before, Navalny’s defining moment in the eyes of many Russians came after the attempt to assassinate him with Novichok. He recuperated in the sanctuary of a German hospital but chose to defy Putin and return to Russia in January 2021, knowing full well he would end up in prison.

  • Gbagginsthe3rd@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    ·
    9 months ago

    I always questioned why he went back to Russia. I thought he could have done so much more outside of a Russian prison. Intentionally in the middle of nowhere, cut off from his supporters and fellow Russians

    But he loved his country and held steadfast in his principles. He is a greater man than many. Could you trust yourself on how you would act when tested the way he was.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      9 months ago

      Could you trust yourself on how you would act when tested the way he was.

      Absolutely. I trust that I would run away like a little bitch. Dude had balls of steel and I truly hope he managed to show the Russian population what a tyrant putin is.

      • FRCLYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Absolutely, most people that think they’d take the high road and do the right thing in this situation are not being honest with themselves. As much as I’d love to believe that I would sacrifice everything to fight tiranny, I just know that when the time comes I would choose the easy way out and espace somwhere for a better life.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I truly hope he managed to show the Russian population what a tyrant putin is.

        He did. And I recoomend you to watch it. Dude investigated his own poisoning.

    • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      9 months ago

      There have been examples of the past where martyrs did change the direction of history. Maybe he hoped it would be similar and I guess we are at the find out stage.

      • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        9 months ago

        Even Lenin stayed out of Russia when the government set it sights on him and waited for a more oportune time to come back. Here’s to hoping Martyrdom will change things, but Russians are very very used to things getting worse and just taking it on the chin.

      • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        He was, himself, a nationalist. Or at least he was in the distant past. He seemed to have distanced himself from that.

        Still, he lived by his principles. He wasn’t a robber or a hypocrite. He genuinely cared about Russia. He loved his nation. I cannot say the same for the party of crooks and thieves.

    • MrFunnyMoustache@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      I thought the same, couldn’t figure out why he returned to Russia when he could do more when he was free. Still, his courage is admirable, I wouldn’t have been able to steel my nerves to do what’s right in the face of these dangers.

    • Technofrood@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean I doubt he would have been safe even if he didn’t go back. Maybe a little bit, but how long before he gets polonium tea, or nerve agented?

    • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      9 months ago

      Which “we” are you talking about? Because a lot of Russians vote for him (and I don’t mean just the fake votes, but the real ones as well).

        • Mistic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          They may not matter in a sense that you can’t elect anybody but Putin.

          But they do matter in a sense of showing the incumbent they aren’t stable.

          After successful re-election of incumbent, they fall into a sense of euphoria. This leads to creation of some absolutely horrific and unjust laws.

          However, when the re-election is deemed unsuccessful (say 55% voted for “the right candidate”, but the second place got scary high 30-35%), they become timid.

          That’s how informational autocracies work. And that’s why elections there absolutely do matter, as they directly affect quality of life. It’s the safest and loudest way of showing the government your middle finger.

    • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      1. You are a Westerner.

      2. You live after the beginning of the Ukrainian War.

      In Russia, for the longest time, dislike of the regime was primarily limited to the youth. The average person had a vague understanding that there was a lot of corruption. However, they did not understand just how deep it went. The average person understood that there was some enrichment going on, but they thought it was mostly local and small-scale. People seldom had personal experience with the repression of dissidents, nor did they know much about the opposition movement.

      Navalni opened people’s eyes. He revealed the palaces of the deputies, ministers, and Vladimir Vladimirovich himself. He revealed how corruption was horrendous on every level of government. He revealed the absurdly close ties between the oligarchs and government. He made the repression visible too, thought this was a much more minor part of his project.

      On the back of all of his investigations, he built a mass movement. Individual, fractured discontent just leads to depressed people who believe themselves to be isolated, the sole sane man in a sea of nutcases. He united people. He organized demonstrations. He made discontent public and visible, thus opening the eyes of even more people.

      The modern opposition movement would not exist were it not for Navalni.

      That being said, there were two main issues with Navalni’s work. First, he wasted a lot of energy telling people to vote, and came up with the Smart Voting scheme to vote out URers, even though he himself acknowledged the lack of fairness in the elections. This was a colossal waste of time, energy, and resources. It changed nothing. You cannot vote out a dictatorship.

      Second, he was a nationalist, especially early on. Later on he became more of a typical liberal, but his years as the sort of guy to yell “Russia is for Russians” have been harmful to the opposition.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    9 months ago

    If Russia is like the US with trump, then there’s the active population who are supporting Putin, because even if he’s a bastard, at least he hurts the right people. Then there’s an apathetic horde, who don’t care or are too beaten down to do anything. Then there’s the group that know what’s up and wants change.

    The question is if Navalny’s death meant anything. The people who care are already at a disadvantage because of the authoritarian State, the supporters aren’t going to change, and the apathetic don’t have time to care. IMO he would have been better off, alive, outside of Russia and criticizing Putin.

    • scemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      What you said could be true of any event, but reality is, each of these events influence apathetic people to either become supporters of the regime or anti-establishment.

      At least, that’s my theory. If not, there would never have been any progress in human society, if things are as static as you theorized.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think the point is, that he might have been able to influence more, if he was alive, and maybe even free, outside of Russia

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t imply society is in a permanent static state, my question is if Navalny’s demise would effect any meaningful change to the status quo.

    • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Russia is not like the US under Donald John. There are indeed rabid supporters of Putin and Russian imperialism (“vatniks”), but the regime functions regardless of popular support.

      You are right about what groups of people exist. You are, however, completely mistaken about their importance if you compare Russia to the US under Trump.

      My understanding, which is based in large part on my personal experience and observation of the size of protests (statistics suck when dictatorships are involved), is that the vast majority of Russians dislike Putin, but they believe that there is nothing that can be done at the moment.

      Doomerism is very strong in Russia. Our prevailing mentality is to suck it up and keep going. It pains me to say this, but in the current conditions of Russia, the doomers have a point.

  • resetbypeer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The day we all knew was coming, sadly. The day he set foot on that plane back to Moscow from Germany, it was not a question of if but when this would happen.

  • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 months ago

    Be careful who you praise:

    Navalny took part in the Russian March, an annual demonstration in Moscow that draws ultranationalists, including some who adopt swastika-like symbols. In 2008, Navalny, like an apparent majority of Russians, supported Russian aggression in Georgia. In 2013, he made illegal immigration from Central Asia a central theme of his campaign for mayor of Moscow. In 2014, after Russia occupied Crimea, he said that, while he opposed the invasion, he did not think that Crimea could be just “handed back” by a post-Putin Russian government.

    https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-evolution-of-alexey-navalnys-nationalism

      • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 months ago

        How is a Nazi a “step in the right direction”? There is a lot of opposition to Putin that’s worth supporting, Nazism isn’t one of them

        • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          In the same way that Biden is preferable to Trump. Biden is far from perfect, has lukewarm political leanings, only advances soft-left policies to better his own election chances and keeps a cop as a vp.

          But Trump is an actual war mongering lunatic wannabe fascist. Sometimes it’s about the lesser evil.

          Yes, you could say there are plenty of people more worth supporting than these two old farts, but none of them are on the ballot are they?

          It’s that situation with Russia. Putin is an actual, proven warmonger who kills his own countrymen to hold on to power. Someone who doesn’t do either of those things and respects the will of the people is a step up, regardless of their politics, because that person can be voted out.

          • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            A lot of people on the internet think there’s an electable Abraham Lincoln instead of what the reality is

          • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            You’re only saying that because you know what Putin is like in power, with his racist remarks and Nazi affiliations you don’t even know how worse it could have been with Navalny

            • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Racist remarks

              You mean like how putin criminalized being gay? It’s one thing to make remarks, it’s another thing to actually oppress a minority by claiming their existence is propaganda.

              Nazi affiliation

              So taking nazis from prison with the promise of a pardon if they fight on russias front line is… What?

              You’re only saying that because you know what Putin is like in power

              This is an incredible fallacy. I’m almost lost for words. First of all, any line of logic that relies on the premise “you’re just saying that because you don’t understand how much worse it could be” is just plain wrong. I could say with the exact same amount of confidence that you don’t understand how much better it could be.

              But also, Putin is by far the most dangerous leader the world has seen since Hitler. He’s an actual fascist, who disappears people who pose any kind of threat to him. He’s single handedly swinging his entire country into a war they don’t want because he feels entitled to Ukrainian land.

              I’d take my chances on literally anyone else who respected the vote. Putin does not. I’d take my chances on someone who would end the war. Putin will see a million of his own die before he even considers it.

              Pushing the whole “Navalny was a nazi so he’s automatically worse” is really downplaying how incredibly evil putin actually is. I mean, he’s basically already a nazi in all but name.

              Get out of here with your Russian apologetics.

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              This looks so similar to russian electoral joke and part of Putin’s propaganda “current thieves are full, new will be hungry and steal more”.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            only advances soft-left policies

            Soft-left? Biden is more right than Navalny.

            Biden and rest of American “left”: maybe we shold do some student debt relief? Just a tini-tiny. If you don’t mind.

            Party started by literal member of Union of Right Forces: universal education, state must provide students with everything(including housing and food) so they don’t worry about anything else other than learning, state must provide teachers with everything(including decent salary) so they don’t wory about anything else other than teaching, state must provide universities with all necessary equipment, buildings must be maintained in good condition(so ceiling wouldn’t fall on students’ and teachers’ heads)!

        • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          What makes you think he was a Nazi? I really hate how watered down the word Nazi is these days. You’re being hyperbolic.

          • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            He compared the people from the region of Caucasus to cockroaches who should be shot and had skinhead and neonazi affiliations.He also supported the invasion of Georgia in 2008, comparing Georgians to rodents. He regularly attended marches of a racist which the slogan is “Russia for ethnic russians”, posted a video where he called for deportations of immigrants…

            It’s not a case of exaggeration, he was anti Putin because he wanted a racist in power.

            • Iceman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qucpwhtWFjk

              It’s still on his Youtube channel. He even shoots a woman in hijab in it! But all his useful idiots will ask you to ignore these dog-whistles. This is of course from back in the day when he was the co-funder of the ultranationalist party National Russian Liberation Movement, that among other things wanted South Ossetia and Abkhazia be made independent from Georgia alá Donbas.

              • uis@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                It’s still on his Youtube channel.

                No?.. How? He didn’t even create his channel until mayor campaign. This video was made years before that?

                He even shoots a woman in hijab in it!

                Where?

                • Iceman@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oVNJiO10SWw

                  It’s his verified account, what more do you want? Argue thats it’s impossible for him to ever have created a new one?

                  As for where? The video is 40 seconds long, even the most ticktock addicted 4 year old have the attention span to see it.

            • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              “Navalny released YouTube videos in which he likened Islamic militants to cockroaches, called for the deportation of immigrant workers, and vowed to defend the rights of ethnic Russians in Russia.”

              This is a pretty mainstream view for a lot of countries.

              Anti immigration doesn’t mean you’re a racist.

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              He compared the people from the region of Caucasus to cockroaches who should be shot

              Navalny: *talks about how terrible for Russia Kadirov’s personal army is*

              Americans: He must be a racist!

              Kadirov’s personal army: *Joins war in Ukraine. On Putin’s side.*

              Americans: Navalny is the worst!

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 months ago

        Better in the sense that there were Nazis less crazy than Hitler? Dude supported the invasion and annexation of part of Georgia, and said Russia shouldn’t give back Crimea to Ukraine in 2014.

        He apologized later, but when he was running for president he was still a bad dude.

          • mellowheat@suppo.fi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            There’s an important difference in Russia and British India. If a Gandhi appeared in Russia, he’d just be thrown in jail and forgotten there. It’s possible that this has happened already. This is nothing new: it’s what they have been doing to political dissidents for centuries.

            Gandhi’s methods worked in India partially because the British Empire had democratic and liberal principles that even as colonial lords they valued enough not to blatantly break.

            • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              And in Russia, you have to appeal to the Nationalists which make up a significant portion of the population. Nationalism doesn’t necessarily mean Nazis.

              Navalny appealed to them and was much more in line with western principles than Putin. Like I originally said, Navalny wasn’t perfect but he was a better option than Putin. Seems a few people disagree with me.

              • uis@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I wonder how local fauna will react to Bashkir nationalist Salawat Yulayev. Probably their views will align with Russian Empire’s. And will be opposite to Republic Baskortostan’s. For Bashkirs he is national hero.

                For those wondering where Bashkiria is it is roughly in the middle of Russia.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      he did not think that Crimea could be just “handed back” by a post-Putin Russian government.

      It is interesting way to rephrase his “Crimea is not a sandwich with sausage to return it back and forth”. For context in 2014 propaganda was talking about annexation as “returning” Crimea to Russia.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      They know. They just don’t care because he’s “their” monster. Nothing will change in the wake of Nelvany’s death.

      This is a harsh lesson in allowing the cult of personality into a democratic election. Everyone should have learned from Hitler’s example but memories are apparently short lived. Now we have people like Netanyahu, Putin, and Trump and a world war is inevitable.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It sadly did end. Now another fucking imperialist is in charge.

        • mellowheat@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_empire

          At its peak, their empire was roughly the same size as the British Empire, 35 million square kilometers. Slightly more than half of it was just Russia, though, of course, which makes this a bit of an orange vs apples thing. But USSR definitely had an empire-like thing going on.

            • mellowheat@suppo.fi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I suppose originally it was, and I do think original goals are important to consider.

              Stalin brought an early end to many progressive dreams, though, and it doesn’t seem like Soviet Union ever really recovered from his regressive regime.

                • mellowheat@suppo.fi
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Today’s Russia is just an entity of a lower order.

                  Indeed it is, but in many ways it’s just a legacy (even if a deeply warped one) of the earlier. Putin was a KGB man, and repeatedly mentions how he thinks the fall of USSR was one of the greatest geopolitical tragedies.

              • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Man, Lenin set fire to a good chunk of his own dreams during the Civil War.

                The betrayal of the SRs and Makhnovists, the butchering of Kronstadt, the subjugation of local soviets and trade unions to centralized top-down rulership, and nationalization of previously independent cooperatives all helped bring down the dreams of equality and liberty. Lenin created all of the infrastructure that Stalin then used to horrifying ends. IMO this is an inevitable outcome of vanguardism and a “dictatorship of the proletariat”, but that is a topic for another day.

                Some of the things mentioned above did manage to survive post-Stalin. There was immense scientific progress in the USSR and the education was the best in the world. Everyone got food, though it was poor-quality and standing in line for it was universal (again, post-Stalin).

                • mellowheat@suppo.fi
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Homelessness wasn’t a thing.

                  Homelessness was illegal in Soviet Union. USA has plenty of problems that are objectively worse in this area, but I’m not sure if just declaring it illegal and sending vagrants to labor camps is a very good solution either.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t understand why he returned to Russia just to get killed.

    It doesn’t seem to have achieved anything. Did he think the rigged Russian courts would save him?

    Snowden and Assange doing everything they can to stay out of the claws of their fascist overlords, but Navalny just handed himself over to his…

    • rdri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      Those who don’t understand that paid little attention to his life and his fight. I suggest you checking out the Navalny documentary at least.

    • summerof69@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I don’t understand why he returned to Russia just to get killed.

      Because in Russia you have to sacrifice yourself and suffer to be “real” politician, and not “stay in cozy Germany”, “preaching from abroad”. Navalny and other imprisoned politicians believe this too, they’re the product of the same society after all.

    • preludeofme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s called dedicating your life to a cause. He knew he was going to be killed and was willing to give up his life to hopefully bring down Putin at some point hopefully in the future

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 months ago

    Further investigation has revealed he died of a rare condition where his balls were just too damn big. There are a lot of people in Russia, but not many at all this brave and resolute. I hope his death awakens more of this rebellious spirit. All evil dictators have a tipping point. Nothing is impossible. Fuck Putin. Fuck the oligarchy. Fuck the propaganda machine. Fuck the military. Fuck them hard.

  • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    Unfortunately I don’t think his sacrifice is gonna achieve much. I’d love to be proven wrong though.

    • mellowheat@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I think a good analogy is Claus von Stauffenberg. A german army colonel who in July 1944 tried to assassinate Hitler and very nearly succeeded.

      He was not a great person given his position, but did a very brave thing eventually and is now revered as somebody who at least tried.

  • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    Don’t idolize people, especially don’t idolize politicians. He died for a generally pro-social cause but that is the extent of the take-away here

    • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Please correct me if I’m wrong but Assange held back dirt obtained on Republicans and only passed out information damaging to Democrats. It’s been a long morning.