In remarks at a judicial conference in Minnesota, Kavanaugh touted the court’s mixed decision votes this past term and his close relationships with other justices.

  • GARlactic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s not an institution of politics, then stop inserting your politics into it, you tool.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s as stupid as saying the Senate is an institution of law, not politics.

    It’s both, you disingenuous dumbfuck.

  • Hopalong@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    In a democratic society everything is political. What beer you drank at lunch is a political question. The Supreme Court is and has always been a political institution whether we or they claim it is or isn’t.

  • MicroWave@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    He also said that when he joined the court, he was surprised by the amount of time the justices spent together. He said he estimated they probably eat lunch together about 65 times a year, adding, “And the rule at lunch is you can’t talk about work.”

    “It’s a good rule,” he continued. “It builds relationships and friendships and then when we have tough cases — and we only really have tough cases — you have a reservoir of good will toward each of the other people.”

    • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 year ago

      And yet there are a striking number of high profile cases decided on a party line 6/3 vote. They can tout the supposed impartiality of the court all they like, but the numbers show otherwise.

      Toss in the refusal to have a hearing on Garland with nearly a year left of Obama’s term, then rushing Kavanaugh in, and of course changing tune when RBG died at the end of Trump’s term to claim it was important to seat someone right away where both politcally motivated. Had none of the above nonsense happened the slant of the court would be much different now.

  • yata@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Never mind the nonsense that he spouts, the very existence of this crying beer baby as a supreme court judge is a mockery of the institution itself.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess that’s how you got that job, eh Kav? All that supposed knowledge of law you have that we’re still waiting for proof of. Your politics had nothing to do with it, right? 🙄