Why YSK: Because fandom’s website is complete garbage, it’s filled with ads, has a horrible UI and has auto playing videos for no reason. For some reason a lot of game wikis still use that website.

  • Crudman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fandom is such a maliciously shitty service. I am eager for it to die and I hope whoever made modern Fandom falls ass first into a puddle

    • glorious_albus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Believe it or not, it’s the same guy that made Wikipedia. Apparently he was sad he couldn’t monetize it, so went ahead and made the cancer that is fandom.

      Disclaimer, this is something I’ve read on different threads on reddit, so take it with a pinch of salt.

  • DessertStorms@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is great information!

    I haven’t seen ads in years (thanks ublock origin), but the wiki fandom pages are by far the absolute worst when it comes to the cookie consent pop up, they have no “reject all”, and it seems like you have to scroll on forever manually deselecting dozens and dozens of individual tick boxes, I won’t even click through to that site anymore, it’s enraging.

    Just had a quick look for my recent addiction, the Alto’s mobile games, and neither are on there, but say Sims is, so I guess they didn’t just copy all the fandom pages, and are doing it by demand, or popularity? Either way, it’s better than no alternative to the fandom wikis, so I’ll take it!

    • quirzle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t seen ads in years (thanks ublock origin), but the wiki fandom pages are by far the absolute worst when it comes to the cookie consent pop up

      If you’re already using uBlock Origin, you can add a list called EasyList Cookie under Filters > Annoyances and also not see most cookie consent popups for years.

    • tal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I just always click “accept all” and have my browser purge all cookies on exit other than a few whitelisted sites. And I have various plugins to block the flagrant cross-site tracking services. Same thing I did before the EU did their cookie directive.

      I don’t think that the EU’s actual intent behind the cookie directive was to literally provide a UI to reject cookies, because trusting the remote end rather than your local browser is kind of fundamentally a broken security model. I think that their aim was to try to increase public awareness of all the cookies that websites are storing by having websites constantly throw up dialogs talking about them.

      • DessertStorms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, if a site doesn’t make it convenient for me to reject their bullshit, I’m happy to look elsewhere, there’s very little information nowadays you can’t find on at least a couple of sites, and for anything else, there are communities to ask.

        And you’re probably right - I don’t really trust that my selections are respected (both on individual sites and on my browser), and often wonder if it’s just an illusion of choice more than anything else, but I’d still rather have it than not.

        My plan is to eventually set up a pi-hole and be done with much of this noise, but I’ve decided it’ll have to wait for when I upgrade to a new machine which I hope to set up much better than this one lol

  • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a great resource - I enjoy fandom’s content (although some is dreadfully written) but the site UI is horrible.

    One thing to note about BreezeWiki, is that it doesn’t seem to have everything on Fandom - for example, I searched for Twin Peaks, and got this message:

    breezewiki.com doesn’t have this page saved.

    However it looks like we can request that it be added by the admin, so that’s something.

  • Nix@merv.news
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh nice I’ve never heard of this. This should get added to that extension that redirects websites to the trackerless frontends

  • kbity@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thank God there’s a less awful alternative frontend for Fandom. Absolute garbage website, unusable without an adblocker.

    • amio@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hell, even without the adblocker it’s rough. So much noise. So much irrelevant shite on the sides. Things fading in and out while you’re reading. Autoplaying videos are so annoying. To top it off, often the content itself isn’t even that good.

  • tal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fandom uses Mediawiki; if you’re familiar with git – a popular revision control tool that a lot of computer programmers use today – you can also use git-remote-mediawiki to use git to gateway a fandom wiki to and from a local git repository.

  • Blaze@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I got an error, am I the only one?

    Exception raised in Racket code at response generation time: string::2: bytes->jsexpr: bad input starting #"You are not allowed to access this resource " context…: /home/cadence/racket/collects/syntax/readerr.rkt:15:2: -raise-read-error /home/cadence/racket/collects/racket/contract/private/arrow-higher-order.rkt:375:33 /home/cadence/breezewiki/src/page-search.rkt:70:2 /home/cadence/racket/collects/racket/contract/private/arrow-higher-order.rkt:375:33 /home/cadence/racket/share/pkgs/web-server-lib/web-server/dispatchers/dispatch-lift.rkt:11:0 /home/cadence/racket/collects/racket/private/more-scheme.rkt:163:2: select-handler/no-breaks [repeats 9 more times] /home/cadence/racket/share/pkgs/web-server-lib/web-server/private/dispatch-server-with-connect-unit.rkt:141:2