President Biden on Friday delivered a ferocious condemnation of Donald J. Trump, his likely 2024 opponent, warning in searing language that the former president had directed an insurrection and would aim to undo the nation’s bedrock democracy if he returned to power.
On the eve of the third anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol by Mr. Trump’s supporters, Mr. Biden framed the coming election as a choice between a candidate devoted to upholding America’s centuries-old ideals and a chaos agent willing to discard them for his personal benefit.
“There’s no confusion about who Trump is or what he intends to do,” Mr. Biden warned in a speech at a community college not far from Valley Forge in Pennsylvania, where George Washington commanded troops during the Revolutionary War. Exhorting supporters to prepare to vote this fall, he said: “We all know who Donald Trump is. The question is: Who are we?”
In an intensely personal address that at one point nearly led Mr. Biden to curse Mr. Trump by name, the president compared his rival to foreign autocrats who rule by fiat and lies. He said Mr. Trump had failed the basic test of American leaders, to trust the people to choose their elected officials and abide by their decisions.
“We must be clear,” Mr. Biden said. “Democracy is on the ballot. Your freedom is on the ballot.”
We need the media to start taking this shit seriously and stop “both sidsing” shit like the insurrection or the fourteenth amendment.
Yeah but the Biden crime family!
I’m not sure I’ve ever heard any major media outlet say “the Trump crime family” even though that’s literally what those 5 traitors are. Not to mention the INCREDIBLE nepotism and grift of putting his kids in the WH.
Imagine Fox News’s heads exploding if Hunter Biden (assuming no criminal past, which is generous comparing with Trump spawn) was an appointment in Biden’s government.
That’s because NPR is too pussy, and all the other outlets are super far right. Overton Window is a B.
Edit:
I’m tempted to buy argument space in the upcoming election booklet and attack my Republican representative and drop “Trump Crime Family” repeatedly. Maybe a super sarcastic one in support and then a more serious one against.
Crime family? I thought he couldn’t speak a sentence properly? Which is it?
He’s just faking it! Old Man Joe really pulls all the strings! He’s both extremely cunning and hopelessly inept! Simultaneously at the same time!
You’re looking for point #8.
That was a really interesting read. Thanks for sharing that. It’s well worth the time for anyone else wondering.
Didn’t Rocky win awards
Mafia “Dons” get old and senile too. Hitler shat. Mussolini farted. There are no gods and only the masters we allow. Does it need to be said that human evil also ages?
I know how we could short circuit the “both sides” arguments. Let’s reform the Democratic primary process into something actually democratic.
-
Everyone gets to vote on the same day.
-
Replace “first past the post” with any of the more functional systems for all elected offices.
-
Let a neutral organization manage debates as an open and consistent process.
The Democratic party has total control over their primary process. Presenting themselves as the “defenders of democracy” while continuing to subvert democracy is a losing strategy, and no amount of complaining about “both sides” arguments will change that.
Everyone gets to vote on the same day.
You realize this would give a huge boost to the “establishment” candidate, right? Primaries are staggered to give lesser known candidates a chance to build up momentum.
Replace “first past the post”
The primary isn’t FPTP. For example, in the 2020 NH primary both Sanders and Buttigieg won 9 delegates, and Klobuchar won 6.
Everyone gets to vote on the same day.
What do you mean by that?
Sounds like removal or remote/mail in voting which is a bad idea. We do need to make voting day a federal required off day so everyone can actually go do it, making that happen wouldn’t eliminate the need for mail in votes though
Personally I think the polls should be open for a week just to make sure everyone has a chance to go.
Keep mail in of course for the people who can’t or don’t want to make it in.
We have to have mail in for those that live super remote and our soldiers stationed abroad.
I agree a week of voting, nov1-7 would solve a lot of issue, make it a federal requirement that business have to provide at least one of those days off
The answer is less populism, not more.
What exactly do you think populism is? Are you aware that you are specifically promoting oligarchy?
-
Both sides it is better for views. Which is better for sponsors. In turn keeping the debate going and keep the fire going. They have zero interest in taking any sides. It’s bad for business.
Didn’t CNN get bought out by some conservative news group fairly recently? I’d be careful about that stuff.
Out of curiosity, do you financially support any left wing news networks (that aren’t owned by a right wing organization such as AT&T) ?
“We all know who Donald Trump is. The question is: Who are we?”
I posted the following elsewhere, just before I read that he said this, as I was thinking about a quote I heard earlier from DL Hughley regarding Trump’s election:
“America saw exactly who it was last night… Exactly who we are,” Hughley said. “I think Obama was what we aspire to be, Trump and his supporters are who we are.”
The Democrats’ problem is that they don’t address who we are. They offer only aspirations. Who are we (beyond the racists and fascists Trump and his supporters represent)? Broke. Sick. Overworked. Exploited. Isolated. Scared. He wants us to vote based on hope that we can push back fascism. Hope that we can win our rights back. He wants us to vote based on some dream of democracy I can’t say I’ve ever witnessed in my lifetime. Give me someone to vote for who’s going to meet us where we are.
Obama was practically the platonic ideal of the perfect neoliberal president. He said all the right words, checked all the right boxes, and effortlessly combined warmth and charm with an air of stern authority. He was, in all likelihood, the best neoliberal president we will ever get. Neoliberalism is clearly not enough.
It’s time for the Democratic party to stop pretending they can serve the elites while paying lip service to the proles. In a rational world, the proles would have no option. Democrats are not their friends, but they will never be as bad as Republicans. But it’s not a rational world, and fascism thrives with the disaffected masses. When faced with the choice between “bad” and “worse”, “worse” is far more attractive than it should be.
“I think Obama was what we aspire to be”
People give Obama way too much credit, but that’s how far great oratory skills will get you as president. He ruled as a conservative and was solidly in the corner of the billionaires, just like every president since Reagan.
This. Common folk haven’t had a president since Carter, and that didn’t go well. Ruling class is called that for a reason. We need more anti-corporatism (aka Boston Tea Party).
as a german I’m not that up to date but is it still possible that this orange, wig wearing cunt can run for presidency?
We’re working on that. So far 2 states (Colorado and Maine, which have 10 and 4 electoral college votes respectively out of a total of 538) have taken Trump off their election ballots, but this will likely go to the supreme court, of which 3 out of 9 judges were appointed by Trump.
Despite 3 of the judges being appointed by Trump, they have made it clear that they won’t do his bidding, so far, so there is hope that he won’t be eligible.
I’m disappointed he’s not already in prison.
Colorado was overturned a few hours ago, he’ll be on the ballot.
deleted by creator
Don’t quote me As I’m not a lawyer, But because the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal I think it puts an injunction on the original ruling making it unenforceable until after the SC makes their ruling, but please correct me if I’m wrong because this is just an educated guess.
And the SCOTUS will likely not rule until after the election, citing “huge backlog” of other “more important” cases.
Actually they’re moving fairly quickly. Oral arguments begin early February.
He can still be ineligible to run for office though, even if he wins a primary.
deleted by creator
Fuck :(
The decision is paused until the Supreme Court renders judgement, this was always going to happen.
It shouldn’t be happening. The law and precedent is clear. But it was going to anyways.
The only question is exactly how compromised the newer additions are, what Harlan Crow wants, and whether Roberts will remember he supposedly cares about the Constitution as a sacred institution.
I think people are missing something important here - this ruling is merely that he can appear on a party primary ballot, which is something not explicitly covered by the constitution. Even if he wins a primary the supreme court can then rule that he’s still ineligible to run as president.
Despite 3 of the judges being appointed by Trump, they have made it clear that they won’t do his bidding,
They have said that, but have they convincingly demonstrated it?
deleted by creator
please work harder and also good luck to you
He will likely be allowed to run because so much of the country supports him, there is some legal gray area (he has not been convicted), and the courts are “conservative.” I personally think he will win because Biden is getting even worse at speeches, much of the population doesn’t think their personal lives improved under Biden, and a lot of people are upset for how Biden has/is handling the Israel war.
A lot of things could happen before the election that would hurt Biden as well. A recession, expansion of Israel war, and losses in Ukraine are possibilities that could hurt Biden. I don’t think anything could hurt Trump. I think he could win the election from prison. Trump voters will eagerly buy any conspiracy theory to keep supporting Trump, and they don’t care about democracy or human rights. Democrat and Biden voters are much more critical and fickle.
“He hasn’t been convicted of insurrection” isn’t a legal gray area, that’s just misdirection by his supporters. Just like most other legal proceedings this one isn’t dependent on the result of other legal proceedings. The supreme court will decide for themselves whether he was “involved in insurrection” - the law here doesn’t depend on him being previously convicted of “insurrection”, a different charge which has a much higher legal bar.
There’s overwhelming evidence that he was “involved” in this insurrection so he’ll almost certainly be held accountable. But whether the supreme court decides to disqualify him depends mostly on their interpretation of the clause naming the offices which he can be banned from. Given that the supreme court are republicans will they rule that “public office” does or doesn’t include the presidency since it isn’t named explicitly in the clause?
The supreme court will decide for themselves whether he was “involved in insurrection”
No they won’t. That has already been found to be fact in the Colorado Supreme Court. They have to decide on it despite that finding. They have to find a way to support their boy despite having to admit he engaged in insurrection.
According to another random lemmy user, the clause actually did originally include the president explicitly, but it was then removed saying the language already covered it so it wasn’t needed.
Not sure if that’s true at all, but apparently it’s recorded history, so if it’s true it’s hard to refute it and say they didn’t mean it?
But maybe they removed it because they saw it as unnecessary? It’d be restating the obvious since it already says insurrectionists can’t be officials, then goes on to list a few examples which were pertinent when the law was created in response to the aftermath of the civil war. In the end it depends whether they decide to interpret part of the clause literally and as more important than the intent of the clause, which seems pretty clear. How they interpret it seems to be a bit up in the air given their party affiliations.
Legal Eagle does a really good run down of the legal aspects here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krVNdQOWYk4
That will likely come down to a decision by our supreme Court, who haven’t been known for making very reasonable (or ethical, or logically consistent) decisions as of late.
My personal hunch is he’ll be allowed to run. Happy to be surprised, though.
He will still lose when he is allowed to run. Because if he is allowed to run EVERYONE will show up to vote him out. Because he’s got way more people that hate him than love him. He lost by a lot last time. And it’s even worse now that we have had to hear about him non stop since he has been in the spotlight.
I suuuuuure hope so
That sounds a lot like how I thought in 2016. I hope you’re right, but my faith in my fellow citizens hasn’t been restored yet.
It’s tired and worn out, but my faith is so low that I look both ways at a roundabout.
He’ll only lose if everyone who comes out votes for the same guy. If people protest vote for a third party, Trump will win.
He isn’t polling very well against Trump… I have my doubts
Polls are only for boring people with nothing else to do but bicker. There are plenty of people that vote that don’t bother with all the grandstanding before the actual elections.
The Supreme Court with a majority of Republican originalists would bend over backwards to let Trump run for presidency
Yes, and he’s just as popular with his voters as he was in 2020, if not more, because they’re sympathetic to his claims that all the charges against him were politically motivated.
The 14th amendment hasn’t been tested to anywhere near this extent ever, so the Supreme Court is likely to rule in his favor because there haven’t been any convictions yet and we have literally nothing to use as precident (and because he personally appointed 1/3 of the justices)everything here has devolved into a state by state issue with state trumping federal laws
it depends on who each individual state decides to put on the ballot to allow the people to vote for
Yes absolutely. It will be up to the Court to decide.
deleted by creator
Dems need to target the people on the fence between voting Dem and not voting at all.
Believe it or not, I’d say that’s who this message is targeted at. It’s for the people saying “Biden isn’t the exact candidate I want, so I’m not going to vote this time to teach Dems a lesson. Then they’ll have to run the exact candidate I want next time.” The message is that you should know that strategy will get you Trump, and you should know by now how that will go.
they need to give people something worth voting for. not being trump just isn’t good enough.
-> You’ll be shot in the head if you don’t eat your Brussels sprouts.
-> No, cookies and ice cream or nothing!
Life and especially politics is full of compromises. Everybody compromises on something on every vote. You know what the stakes are, and you know what the consequences of inaction are.
Unfortunately, “not Trump” IS a good enough reason, and you have the choice to come to terms with that fact before November, or during a Trump presidency/dictatorship.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
>“Give me a perfect progressive candidate or I’ll let fascists dismantle democracy.”
this is a straw man
Let me present a more charitable interpretation then.
“Give me a better candidate or I’ll let fascists dismantle democracy.”
Better?
>You’re either an accelerationist that wants to see another civil war or a toddler throwing a tantrum.
false dichotomy
>The system is bullshit but the best we can do is stave off fascism for another election,
the system is already fascist. it doesn’t matter if you vote for the architect if the crime bill and the patriot act
>Not voting won’t teach dems shit.
that was never the plan
Then what is the plan?
aggressively petition our leaders
This implies the working class has any impact on policy. The only ones with political influence are the donor class. When your single voice has the same impact on politicians as people like Jeff Bezos, then maybe. But you have no voice or representation in politics.
The whole ‘push him left after the election’ hasn’t worked out so well, as Biden continued to shift to the right.
This implies the working class has any impact on policy. The only ones with political influence are the donor class. When your single voice has the same impact on politicians as people like Jeff Bezos, then maybe. But you have no voice or representation in politics.
You think that would improve in any way if Trump gets elected?
I agree, it sucks that Dems don’t have to actually try right now. But the fact is Trump has openly said he would be a dictator (“just for one day”) and has openly demonstrated his unwillingness to ever give up power. When people tell you who they are, believe them.
There’s no sense in “teaching Dems a lesson” to run a better candidate if it leads to a very real possibility of the Dems never being able to run a candidate again. Unfortunately right now the only 2 options are:
- teach the Republicans a lesson that they have to run reasonable candidates with reasonable policies or they will lose hard, then pressure Dems to run better candidates or the at least somewhat reasonable Republican candidate will win. Or:
- burn it all down and hope something better rises from the ashes (and that you and your loved ones survive).
I mostly agree with that, but biden has shown that he can be swayed by public opinion. I wish he would hurry the fuck up when it comes to Israel, but he’s slowly moving to a harder stance.
Sounds like the mental gymnastics people in Dictatorships, Slavery or Servitude use to justify going along with what their masters want.
Better be the master’s trusted slave than the slave that gets beatings all the time, eh?!
deleted by creator
What executive level policies would you like to see enacted?
The message is that you should know that strategy will get you Trump
This really does depend on where ya live, though.
As a Californian I already know what my states 55 will be voting for (yay electoral college) and since I can also tell that people going “Biden ain’t good enough” are in the minority here I can pretty safely not vote for him this time (did last time) to hopefully help send the message that they’re losing numbers even in deep blue states. I get that it’s a small protest but when youve already called and written your representatives to say shit like this you can only do so much.
My local elections will be voted in, as normal, but I’m gonna give my presidential one to a third party or nobody this year guilt free
A perfectly fair point. My only concern there is that reliance on “sure things” in 2016 is part of why Hillary lost. There were, after all, more votes for Trump in California than any other state, simply down to population size. I’d just hate to see us all get shot in the foot again due to complacency.
It’s a stupid protest, because the only reason any third party people are on the ballot is because they want to be Biden spoilers. Jill Stein is a Russian op, for example.
None of these “third parties” even run in want local, or even any federal elections besides president. They are fake parties, why would you encourage that sort of thing? To “say” you don’t like Biden enough? You think these Russian and GOP dark money funded people are more worthy of your vote?
“We’re not Trump” isn’t enough, no matter how bad Trump is.
As someone with lots of trans and LGBT+ people in my chosen family, it abso-fucking-lutely enough. When the options are compromising and voting for the establishment center-right candidate who will protect those I love and the possibility of a fascist coming to power who wants to destroy them, it’s not even a question on whether it’s good enough.
People have to stop acting like perfect is the opposite of good when the only other alternative is an out of control dumpster fire.
That’s funny, for me as a cishet white middle aged dad without many LGBT+ friends and family but who gives a shit about other people, it is also abso-fucking-lutely enough! Never mind that I like not living in a dictatorship.
We, as voting citizens, are left to believe Democrats don’t want to move left. That is the only reason they won’t adopt progressive policies. It’s not because people wouldn’t vote for them. It’s exemplified by Bidens voting record. I’m not saying they should have picked someone with a better record. I’m saying, outside a handful of people, all of their voting records are shite when you start looking at them. From that handful they are either, 100 year old jesus(bernie) or a bunch of stinkers. Sure, they could pull from the younger generation but let’s face it; the Democratic party structure favors seniority.
One thing is for sure neither party is going to willingly give up power and we as americans instinctually know the only way to get it back is to take it.
americans instinctually know the only way to get it back is to take it.
Unfortunately that is the only way left. The left doesn’t have a Koch sugar daddy, who provided millions to establish teabaggers and far right crazies as political forces.
I wouldn’t want a Koch sugar daddy. There is no such thing as a benevolent king.
Judging by what I’ve seen in my own country in the non-mainstream Left, people who have grown-up in the neoliberal era have generally interiorized stuff like “greed is good” (for supposed lefties, maybe not at the overt putting yourself first level, but certainly as the demanding for your “group” that which mainly benefits people like yourself) and Consumerism, and very few overcome that without a little bit of experiencing multiple sides of life (not quite the same as being old but up to a point correlated with age).
This would explain why its so hard to find people even in their 30s with actual leftwing principles (“the greatest good for the greatest number”) rather than merelly liberal ones (“people should be allowed to do whatever they want”) interpreted in a way that’s compatible with things like extreme wealth hoarding - the latter are absolutelly compatiblle with neoliberalism (which wants that very same freedom of doing anything including in the economic field) whilst the former is not (because total freedom in the economic field quickly becomes the opposited of “the greatest good for the greatest number” because some people couldn’t care less about making others suffer if it yields them even the tiniest of personal gains and since money makes money and money is power those often yield enormous power in a system where the power of the state has been nullified in the name of “freedom”)
Removed by mod
Perfectly well said, the same problem is happening in the UK at the moment, with Labour running on a platform of “we’re not Torries” without actually advocating for any changes
Don’t blame me, I voted for the email lady.
WE ALL SAW WHAT TRUMP DID ON JAN 6
He reminded people to be peaceful and refrain from violence?
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1346912780700577792
He said that on twitter, while advocating for insurrection in a live speech. If he cared that much he would’ve gone on a public speech too, but that would’ve actually been heard by the target demographic
Sorry, but that’s misinformation. He also said it in his speech, but they left that part out at the impeachment trial.
Classic Trump supporter here, posting sources that contradict their point as supporting their point because, out of eight statements, one weakly suggested peace while the other seven weakly suggested insurrection.
This is how con men win over the critical thinking challenged crowd.
Right, because critical thinking equals defending the majority opinion.
Critical thinking means reading an article with one point that agrees with your stance and seven points that contradict it and realizing it doesn’t actually support your argument.
Critical thinking means you question what you read, hear, think, write, and say. If you were capable of critical thought, you’d have read your previous comment and realized it doesn’t actually address my comment at all. It just makes an unrelated point. But you’re not capable of even primary school level feats of cognition yet you still vote, and people like you are why American democracy is circling the drain. You just. Don’t. Think.
Did you read the entire page?
Those were not his only directions to the crowd, however. In the same speech, he also used the following phrases while encouraging people to head to the Capitol and protest his election loss, according to the transcript and video of the speech:
- “We will stop the steal.”
- “We will not let them silence your voices.”
- “You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.”
- “We have come to demand that Congress do the right thing.”
- “We’re going to try and give [lawmakers] the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.”
- “We’re going to have to fight much harder.” “We fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”
Which of these statements strikes you as more of an incitement to violence, than, say, “I just don’t even know why there aren’t uprisings all over the country.” or “This is a movement, I’m telling you, they’re not going to stop, and everyone beware, because they’re not going to stop before Election Day in November, and they’re not going to stop after Election Day. And everyone should take note of that, on both levels, that they’re not going to let up, and they should not, and we should not.”?
id like to piggy back, youre really stupid and i hate you. i have no extra argument as everyone has shown you everything you need to see its obvious you treat reality like religion where your opinion intrinsically holds truth.
the best part of reality is despite what you want to believe, trump still incited violence and insurrection. your opinion on the matter doesnt change the reality. this isnt christianity this is real life.
I’m sorry you feel that way. Must be rough.
Yeah, seriously, one time he told everyone to remain peaceful. That totally contradicts every other time he almost explicitly called for violence! And certainly, he didn’t want it to happen, because as we all saw he swooped in immediately when they started to attacking the capitol to tell them to stop, instead of disappearing for an hour and a half.
Stop being such an easily fooled sheep. The proof is in the pudding: his cultists who were in the capitol that day nearly universally said they were there because Trump wanted them to be there. From their own fucking mouths, and you’re still trying to maintain that Trump wasn’t instrumental in making that happen.
Fuckin do something about it. Lock his ass up in the name of homeland security.
Luckily, and despite what Trump keeps whining about, the POTUS can’t have people locked up. The courts are doing their job, as they should in a democracy. Calling for the POTUS to ignore the law, like a tyrant, in order to protect the democracy from tyranny is not a good look.
If it were me or you we would be locked up pending trial. Don’t give me excuses
The “Saving Democracy” messaging is not going to reach people at all. Also, not being Trump is not good enough also. This is going to be rough if Democracy rests on the shoulders of the current leader enabling genocide.
Not being Trump is the best you’re going to get. I guess you’ll just have to choose if the guy you vote for to destroy Palestine also plans to destroy the USA.
People should just brace for the worst outcome. Biden losing to someone saying “Day 1 Dictator” is pretty crazy but extremely possible. Trump is good at framing things being better under his run, and people care about their material needs being met.
Trump is good at framing things being better under his run, and people care about their material needs being met.
Too bad those same people can’t see how severely they’re being lied to by Trump.
Because that’s how fascists work. They make chaos, then bill themselves as the solution to that chaos.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I detest loudly what is happening to the Palestinians. But people like you are willing to let their own nation fall into fascism for people half a world away. Letting Trump win will absolutely not help the Palestinians, and in fact could make things worse as a Trump-led administration tells the IDF, “Hey, need any help slaughtering civilians?”
This nation has fallen into fascism way before Trump. This nation is built on it. Arms dealer nation full of psychopaths who enabled the lesser of two evils until they got two choices of genocide on the ballot. It isn’t harm reduction for the people who are already dead. Better put that energy into getting Biden to stop losing to a man calling himself a dictator.
So just let the world burn? Take the Black Pill and succumb to the end of the world? The end of all we know? The end of us? Coward. Raise your head and scream out against oblivion, cry out in defiance of fate. Where’s your rage, your anger? You choose to go silently into that cold dark night, I however will go down kicking and screaming.
I’ve been having the same thoughts. I think liberals, especially white liberals, are scared of a Trump presidency because, for once, the fallout might come down on them. They don’t have to be scared of a Biden presidency, because their lives can continue on as they have been. So then they attack you for saying that the US is already a fascist state, even though it already is for anyone who isn’t white and straight.
You get it. Most of the saving of democracy comes down to being comfortability and not actual democracy or even fixing systematic issues. The saving democracy has terms and conditions anyway depending on who you are. My black experience isn’t the same as theirs. I could vote for Biden and he still would increase police funding like he did last time.
deleted by creator
Uhh
Please do not invoke my rights as an excuse to let Trump take away more of my rights. What the fuck.
This comment is so shitty and condescending and completely devoid of intelligence. It reads the same as “Please do not invoke my white privilege as an excuse to let Trump take away my white privilege.” Liberals love to act like they care about issues but comments like these come off so self-centered. I don’t live in some fantasy world where a second Trump presidency is better than a second Biden presidency, but liberals are so adamant that it has to be Biden. Why aren’t liberals outraged that the DNC is forcing an unpopular candidate down our throats again? The most common response I see is “it’s complicated” but it’s not fucking complicated in the slightest, liberals just want to be comfortable and they’ll gladly roll over and take it from anyone who promises them to at least use lube. Yes I’m talking about you.
You say that like Trump would not have enabled genocide in Ukraine
Lemmy doesn’t care about Ukraine anymore. Half the people on here are on some moral high horse like there is a chance that the US wouldn’t be supporting Israel if someone else was in power. Not that it’s okay I think we shouldn’t be sending shit there or supporting what they are doing at all but that’s reality of the situation.
Exactly. People will see this so-called “democracy” and wonder if it’s even worth saving. The only choices we’re given are if we want things to get worse slower or faster.
I fear part of the issue is many United States citizens either know or indirectly understand that the United States already isn’t fully a democracy anymore.
They’ll sacrifice their lives for a person who is demonstrably the actual biggest loser in history, and he just gets more loser-y, folks, okay… If any of you are starting to have your memories fade, here’s a quick refresher to read this morning and then copy and send to your aunt karen in Missouri.
- 0 re-elections won
- 1 term president
- 2 times impeached
- 3 marriages
- 4 inch lifts in his shoes
- 5 kids, from 3 different mothers
- 6 bankruptcies
- 7 US Capitol police suing him for Jan 6 terrorist insurrection and murder of police
- 8 trillion + dollars added to the US debt in a single term
- 9 trump lawyers sanctioned by federal judge for lying in frivolous election fraud lawsuits and ordered to pay defendant’s legal fees
- 10 years that trump paid $0 in income taxes between 2000 and 2015. ($0 to cops, teachers, roads, prisons, disaster relief, etc)
- 11 trump associates charged with serious crimes over the past 5 years
- 12 million votes (the big lie) - trump claims he won the 2020 election by 12 million votes when in reality, he lost by about 7 million votes.
- 13 of August, 2021 - one of multiple days that trump was supposed to magically become president again according to Qanon and a crack addicted pillow salesman (the two most respected information sources in the gop)
- 14 year old girl in a youth choir that trump approached in 1992 to say, “Wow! Just think - in a couple years I’ll be dating you.”
- 15 originally confirmed cases of COVID in the US trump said would soon be, “down to close to zero.” followed by, “like a miracle, it will disappear.” - over 1,000,000 Americans have since died of COVID and it continues to kill 4 years later.
- 16 years old - age of daughter ivanka when she hosted “miss teen” pageant and, according to long time trump associate Noel Casler, “trump called her over in the middle of a rehearsal and had her give him a lap dance while he leered at the crew.”
- 17 known trump and russia investigations from local, state and federal prosecutors
- 18 gop senators that ignored trump threats / warnings and supported Biden admin’s infrastructure bill.
- 19 as in COVID19 - trump was verified as the single largest source of disinformation on the virus, with a Cornell study claiming that 38% of the “misinformation conversation” originated with trump
- 20 the day in January, 2021, when Biden was sworn in despite trump inciting a violent insurrection to stop election verification at the US Capitol.
- 21 gun salute that trump ordered for himself when he left office after a humiliating defeat, even though he never served in the military, famously called military members “losers” and “suckers” and actively avoided the draft with a cowardly “bone spurs” excuse.
- 22 date in August, 2021, when Alabama hate rally crowd booed trump for finally saying people should get vaccinated, only after 700,000 Americans have died due mostly to his failure as president
- 23 as in wrestlemania 23 in 2007 where trump, a cartoon level failure with no other prospects, participated in a fake bet that a proxy wrestler would win a fake fight on his behalf or he would shave his wig and hair plugs off.
- 24 day in August, 2021, when trump actually filed a lawsuit in Florida court against YouTube, a private company, demanding that they reinstate his YouTube channel like a desperate, irrelevant embarrassment with no platforms left to abuse.
- 25 plus credible sexual assault allegations against trump, spanning decades and with accusers starting as young as 13 years old at time of assault.
amazing copy spaghetti
deleted by creator
Trump sucks but lets not pretend Biden isn’t an amalgamation of weapons contractors and ruthless capitalists pulling his puppet strings. We can do better than 100 year old presidents that won’t be here when they ruin tomorrow
Biden was ruining things when he was younger too. He pushed the crime bill and pushed to make student loans non-dischargeable through bankruptcy. However he’s now forgiven since he pardoned a small fraction of the prisoners he helped imprison and forgave a small fraction of the student loans he helped build up. Most progressive president in modern US history!!!1
Nobody is saying Biden is great, I agree we could do better. So stop with the whataboutism. If it weren’t against Trump, there might be more tradeoffs to talk about. But right now it’s pretty much “anyone but Trump”
Any other poorly-applied buzzwords like “whataboutism” you’d like to apply? It doesn’t stop with trump. Before trump was bush, and the message was “we gotta stop bush”. It’s not a “just this time” sort of deal. Democrats will keep promoting the shittiest candidates and then say that we must vote them in because the alternative is worse. It doesn’t end.
When one of the candidates claims they will be a dictator then any other candidate will automatically be better.
The moral gap between the candidates has never been wider.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvUEsm0wNIA
This is nothing new.
Whataboutism isn’t a buzzword, it’s a logical fallacy. Its exactly what you are saying, “what about Biden though!” while completely ignoring the point being discussed, which is that we want an alternative to trump
It is a buzzword because people like you misuse the hell out of it. I wasn’t even the one who brought up biden, I was responding to a post that talked about him. It’s like you’ve never had a conversation with a human before. Conversations can involve more than one laser-point-focused subject.
Name another president since Carter that is more progressive. We’ll wait.
I’m waiting too, because democrats won’t let one get through.
So you’re complaining about Biden but admit he’s the most progressive president in 50 years. Sounds about on brand for progressives.
No one is denying that biden is the most progressive president that will democrats will allow through, so it’s not much of an admission. This isn’t the gotcha you think it is. That you’re satisfied with a bar so low that it reaches into the core of the Earth sounds about on brand for a diehard democrat such as yourself.
I’m not a democrat and I’m certainly not a huge fan of Biden. But he’s not demented and he’s the best president for progressives in 50 years. Yet progressives act like there is no difference between Biden and Trump. The reason you’re not getting a reasonable progressive candidate/president is that nothing is ever good enough for progressives.
If you’re not a democrat, you still certainly talk like a democratic party PR bot. Asking for health care or to not be under loads of student loan debt is not too much to ask for, but apparently it is for you and the rest of the Biden cheerleaders who think we should all be happy with the garbage-ass president that the democrats pushed through as president. Progressives wanted Bernie. Bernie was the compromise and even then Biden doesn’t hold a candle to Bernie. Biden is fucking garbage, so you touting that he’s the most progressive president that the democrats will allow only makes you and the democratic party (that you supposedly aren’t a fan of) look bad.
you are doing great
Boy, would that sound less hollow if the dems were not actively trying to cancel primaries.
Pray tell, say more.
Well, you see, I’m a sheep and can’t really think on my own, and so when I was told that Biden not debating is actually cancelling the primaries, well, you know, I just started to parrot it because that’s my job.
Cancel primaries? Sounds like a huge load of BS. I don’t suppose you have a source?
deleted by creator
Add New Hampshire to the list of states showing DNC election interference along with Tennessee, North Carolina.
I get the frustration people have with NH always going 1st. However, SC was pushed 1st, specifically bc of how Biden performed there last election.
It’s crazy how obviously racist their justification for the NC move is too. Black people are apparently interchangeable, and a black person in NC is just like a black person in NY, Detroit, LA, Chicago, or Texas. They couldn’t possibly have different perspectives or interests, after all, they are black.
Do explain please.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
https://www.democracynow.org/2012/10/17/green_partys_jill_stein_cheri_honkala
“President Biden on Friday delivered a ferocious condemnation of Donald J. Trump, his likely 2024 opponent, warning in searing language that the former president had directed an insurrection and would aim to undo the nation’s bedrock democracy if he returned to power.”
dude has someone chained to chair to keep her from participating in American democracy but somehow he is a defender of democratic values
“We must be clear,” Mr. Biden said. “Democracy is on the ballot. Your freedom is on the ballot.”
we lost rights with you as president and with trump and with obama such as voting rights some are not allowed to vote and some states tell you who is going to be on the ballot or not restricting choices
jill stein said it better
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jill_Stein
Stein stated during the 2016 campaign that the Democratic and Republican parties are “two corporate parties” that have converged into one. Concerned by the rise of neofascism internationally and the rise of neoliberalism within the Democratic Party, she has said, “The answer to neofascism is stopping neoliberalism. Putting another Clinton in the White House will fan the flames of this right-wing extremism. We have known that for a long time, ever since Nazi Germany.”
I figured people would’ve learned from the elections involving folks like Nader and Stein, but I guess here we go again.
me too
when someone says something progressive and wants to do something for the citizens everybody yells that is too far do baby steps
The conservatives do, not everyone.
deleted by creator
“Democracy is on the ballot. Your freedom is on the ballot”
Indeed, vote out these two geezers from the government
I share your objective, but how. The third party approach has been a complete and total failure, and the spoiler effect makes it dangerous. Pushing the Democrats left has achieved at least some minor wins. Third parties have had none.
“But if people just voted third party…”. Great, you found a political strategy that can win, provided that the majority of voters do as their told. If we had that kind of unified engagement, any strategy would win.
Voting for a third party will push red and blue to change more than asking them kindly. As soon as a third party start to get attention red and blue even if still in power will have to go in damage mode not to lose all their voters.
Voting for a third party will push red and blue to change more than asking them kindly.
Actually, it’s probably the exact opposite. They want fewer people actually involved in the election, because then they need to convince fewer people to vote for them in order to win. If you effectively remove yourself from the voting pool, by voting for someone who can’t win, you are basically making it so they don’t have to court you, not that they will.
Even if you managed to get a third party elected, it would just revert back to two parties very rapidly. This is the nature of a FPTP voting system. This is not something you can do top down by flipping a switch. It’s gotta go the other way. Work on your local elections.
Go ahead and vote for a fascist or a genocide supporter and remember for the rest of your days that you voted for it
Even if I were to agree with this and I could oversimplify it to this one thing, under the current situation my vote is only meaningful if I choose one of the two. And there is a lot more at stake than a policy difference over support for Israel.
So how the rest of my days play out will not be affected at all by my choice to support Biden in the upcoming presidential election.
You, however, seem blinded by anger. Your third party vote on principle will unlikely free you from this anger. Maybe it’s time to look elsewhere.
So how the rest of my days play out will not be affected at all by my choice to support Biden in the upcoming presidential election.
Sounds like you are lucky enough not to live in africa, western europe, south america or the middle east otherwise you would taste the consequences of voting for a fascist or a genocide supporter first hand under live bullets.
Sound like you are also not really smart because you fail to realize that the moment your country stop being governed by corrupted politicians in bed with billionares and warlords, public money and the economy would spin in favor of people and not evil corporations exploiting workers and the environment for more profits.
because you fail to realize
The fact that you think you were able to infer the rest of the paragraph from what I’ve said proves that, despite how dumb I am, I’m still light years more intelligent than you.
Third parties are not a new concept. Just like the two parties, they have a track record we can look at. This has never happened. Bernie Sanders has pushed the Democrats further left than anyone since FDR, and he only started to make substantive gains when he ran as a Democrat.
If you want to claim that third parties can achieve anything at all, it’s on you to explain what changed. The track record is abysmal.
Go ahead and vote for a fascist or a genocide supporter then. I’m sure this will turn out good and the two party will change its policies because someone on social media is reacting with angry emojis
Agreed. You are getting downvoted by all the Russian and Chinese (and idiot Americans) that just want to foment division. Democracy is on the ballot. Just not the way most people think.
Voting third party is not really a viable strategy until we change the FPTP voting system. You aren’t going to fix this by attempting to vote for a third party in the upcoming presidential election. If you want change in the system, you have to start from the bottom and work in local elections and then state elections to get them to change the voting system. Then we can have viable multiple parties. But this “we can vote out the POTUS in the next election!” is theoretically possible, but it’s also painfully naive in reality.
is theoretically possible, but it’s also painfully naive in reality.
In reality is just as easy as putting a vote on a third party
“You can’t be pro-insurrectionist and pro-American.”
The United States were literally founded on an insurrection.
Not sure what point you’re trying to make. Back then they couldn’t be pro-insurrectionist and pro-Britain; you can’t be pro-something you want to revolt against.
The point is that being American is being anti-government.
You need to learn more about the Boston tea party. Being American originally meant being anti-corporatism. And Trump is definitely pro-corporatism.
Right, that’s why every major corporation out there has been donating to his campaign.
Oh wait…
Super PACs big dog. Citizens United. You have no idea who they’re buying. Free speech baby!
Weird how it’s been going on for a quarter of a millennium then.
Yes, and all without any major incidents like assassinations or revolution attempts either /s
Are you still making blanket statements about ‘being American’? Because you make it sound like Americans are a bunch of failing losers with your last statement if you are.
deleted by creator
