A Christian graphic artist who the Supreme Court said can refuse to make wedding websites for gay couples pointed during her lawsuit to a request from a man named “Stewart” and his husband-to-be.
I can’t say I ever expected to see the Supreme Court rule on hypothetical situations. Modernity is wild.
I remember when the justices were going through supreme court confirmation hearings and they said they couldn’t answer hypotheticals. Turns out they were lying to get the job and they CAN use hypotheticals to strip away citizen’s rights they don’t like.
Removed by mod
Do we have to be in a religion to deny services to someone in a maga or prolife hat?
I’ll join that religion.
Those were never protected classes, so you can feel free to do that even without their terrible ruling.
