• Seraph
    link
    fedilink
    688 months ago

    The Venn Diagram of the people reading this and the people that it helps is two separate circles.

  • @Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    628 months ago

    I can’t believe this is happening. How can this be happening. We have the biggest threat to democracy in our short existence as a country and we counter it with the least dynamic candidate we could possibly run against him. I dread to think how we’re letting power politics destroy this country. We hardly have a country left anymore. It’s going to take something more.

    • @agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      218 months ago

      It’s so frustrating.

      The way I think about it is that the country has been on a particular path leading up to this confluence of things that make it possible. The GOP has played the long game in response to nixon by establishing right wing media (am radio, fox news, etc) to ramp up the coordinated brainwashing. The right has also stacked the courts and gerrymandered their asses off to stay in power and gain more. And they have attacked education for decades as well. They’ve also been stoking nationalism and religion for some time.

      Corporate ownership of News Media has consolidated to just a few companies due to the dismantling of antitrust laws over the last several decades.

      Protection against money in politics has been eroded making all that possible as well as allowing regulatory capture and the citizens united ruling etc.

      And that’s some of the reason for the '08 collapse and subsequent wealth transfer from middle and bottom to the top. that plus offshoring of the 90s - 00s and other factors have left a lot of people in rough shape economically.

      That sets the stage for desperate people to seek a populist leader and one of em who is a particularly talented grifter stepped up. If it wasn’t him it would have been someone eventually.

      Meanwhile Democrats have become beholden to corporations and the rich, drifting centrist or center right. Our voting mechanisms ensures a two party system. So the only ones in leadership available to counter fascism are exactly the types that are least affected by fascism and they’re more motivated to side with capitalists. And more than a few capitalists tend to side with fascists.

      All the cautionary tales about fascism have been useless. Because those tales focus on the end game instead of the lead up.

      If we want to prevent fascism rising elsewhere, they need to fight the things that set the stage for fascism to rise decades later. (The various things mentioned above).

      The more I think about it the more I suspect de-regulating capitalism might be the main thing that can lead to fascism. Hell maybe it inevitably leads down that path idk.

    • @Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      118 months ago

      We are denying our way into an extinction event. How men like Hitler come to power isn’t exactly a mystery but we just sit back and let it happen.

  • Heresy_generator
    link
    fedilink
    32
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Rule #1: Believe the autocrat. He means what he says. Whenever you find yourself thinking, or hear others claiming, that he is exaggerating, that is our innate tendency to reach for a rationalization. This will happen often: humans seem to have evolved to practice denial when confronted publicly with the unacceptable. Back in the 1930s, The New York Times assured its readers that Hitler’s anti-Semitism was all posture. More recently, the same newspaper made a telling choice between two statements made by Putin’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov following a police crackdown on protesters in Moscow: “The police acted mildly—I would have liked them to act more harshly” rather than those protesters’ “liver should have been spread all over the pavement.” Perhaps the journalists could not believe their ears. But they should—both in the Russian case, and in the American one.

    Autocracy: Rules for Survival by Masha Gessen

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    58 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Many proponents of Jim Crow-era voting regulations — a nakedly racist attempt to ensure white political dominance — described them as a restoration of Southern democracy after the alleged Northern tyranny of Reconstruction.

    Trump and his team have a series of proposals to crack down on dissent, including by remaking the Justice Department into a tool for jailing his enemies and sending troops to suppress protests.

    They have extensive plans to replace as many as 50,000 career civil servants with ideologues and toadies, putting people ready and willing to undermine the rule of law in key positions to act on Trump’s dubious orders.

    While a second Trump term is vanishingly unlikely to produce an openly fascist state — that’s not really how authoritarian takeovers of democracy work today — it’s quite plausible that they could do extensive, even fatal, damage to the American system by pulling the right policy levers.

    The second is to argue that the end of American democracy is unthinkable: The United States government has so many veto points that even a competent and determined authoritarian would find themselves hampered by Congress, federalism, and the courts.

    And though the United States is very different from both Hungary and Israel, we also have a long history of anti-democratic politics — one that the Republican Party has, in word and in deed, grown increasingly comfortable aping in recent years.


    The original article contains 1,405 words, the summary contains 230 words. Saved 84%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!