• Zerfallen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Close, but 2000s had some very intrusive and malware ridden advertisements. Popups everywhere, aggressive banners, malware and random browser toolbars being installed to your system. Complete wild west of unrestrained advertising. Online ad blocking didn’t start with Ublock Origin, the first tipping point was in the 90s and 2000s, where famously clean and effective search engine Google swooped in to “save us” with their Chrome browser blocking popups by default, and their own concept of ‘ethical ads’, which were mostly unobtrusive and text-based (what happened there?). Which was nice for a while before Google exploited the popularity that bought them to turn into an inescapable ad monster.

  • KirbyProton@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are you talking about, ads were far worse back in the 90s /2000. Were you even using the Internet back then? Couldn’t block them and things like infinite pop ups were rampant, if you didn’t have a firewall setup and anti virus, your entire Windows 98 setup could be wrecked in minutes just being online

    • Engywuck@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Again, the meme is not about the internet in 2000s. It is just about people sharing out of fun vs. “creators” wanting to monetize every little shit.

      • KirbyProton@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just such a common misconception that there was no ads in the ‘old Internet’, that’s all I was pointing out. There seems to be a nostalgic false memory that Internet back then didn’t have ads which is hilarious if you were there to see what it was like

          • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, because if anything is better than granular data harvesting, it was ActiveX scripts wreaking havoc on your machine just by opening a webpage, disguised as ads.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    pays for own domain/no ads

    There is a 0% chance you were an adult in the early 2000s lol

    Imagine having ads in things but instead of just being there, they opened in new windows, were loud as fuck, and opened by the hundreds. That’s what the Internet was like

    Pop up blockers walked so ad blockers could run.

    • Engywuck@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There is a 0% chance you were an adult in the early 2000s lol

      I’m 49, dude. And the meme isn’t about “the internet”. It is literally about the difference between people sharing stuff back then and “creating content” today. Shitty internet parts have always been shitty, but at least people didn’t try to monetize even their beloved ones’ death.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m 49 dude

        Then you should remember these days more accurately.

        People make social media posts instead of geocities pages these days. Content creators are more like the people who used to sell content online than they are the average chucklehead who made a geoshitty page.

        People you see with lots of Twitter followers are exactly akin to people who ran pages on free hosting websites. When they link their merch, it’s exactly like how blogs and shit would sell merch.

        Youre looking at this with glasses so rosy they’re completely blinding.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        When I was 18 I was pretty dumb, yeah. I once totally destroyed a hard drive by corrupting a file trying to make my PC background the “Anal Destruction” website logo

        Young people are dumb man.

        • NOSin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, so you missed that what OP talked about was very real. We had much more of those sites based on sharing, and they were much more at the front of the internet.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There were absolutely not more websites based on sharing in the early 2000s lol

            You are literally on one of the very many websites dedicated to it, today, while bemoaning it’s absence

            Some of the sharing sites from the 2000s monetized themselves and that upsets you. I have no issue with that. There are many alternatives because what he said is false. Go use one of them.

            • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Bro that’s anecdotally false, there were so many ham, electronics and random research sites I perused on angelfire and geocities.

              Quality varied greatly, but lots of thought went into making posts, diagrams were sometimes done in ASCII art which was its own headache.

              Point is, I don’t agree with your take, and I don’t think my similarly aged friends would agree either. Internet of late 90s/y2k wasn’t an ad-free utopia, but the point was more about conversing and sharing info.

              Lemmy is an attempt to return to that original intent, modernized as it must be.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You may want to give “HAM radio forums” a Google.

                I don’t care if you agree. I care what’s correct. The Internet is many times larger than I was 20+ years ago, and all the same free networks exist. The really popular ones got big and monetized.

                That’s just how success works with anything.

                • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Hmm? Your argument and thinking processes both seem clouded.

                  Ham radio forums still exist, as they previously did. Did you miss the gist, that information exchange was more of a prime focus vs making money by cramming ads everywhere? Obviously yes.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    People seem to forget that before YouTube partnered with content creators people just kinda… uploaded stuff that they were passionate about. They didn’t do it for a living and they did not expect payment but might have asked for donations if their channel was costly to run. Sure, the production value and editing quality was a lot lower, but the core experience was still the same.

    This is why I flatly reject the notion that me blocking ads on YouTube hurts content creators in any meaningful way, especially now that almost all of them are partnered with some kind of sponsor embedded in the video.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      The core experience was definitely not the same, what are you talking about? Yeah sure if you just wanted entertainment maybe, but educational content for example requires so much research and double checking that it wouldn’t be possible without ad money.

      I’m not saying that blocking ads makes you a bad person (I did it too before I could afford premium), but it does have a measurable effect and pretending it doesn’t is stupid.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah sure if you just wanted entertainment maybe, but educational content for example requires so much research and double checking that it wouldn’t be possible without ad money.

        Research did not begin when YouTube started paying people to upload to their platform. It was already being done. It might be more accessible to people who only do YouTube and do not get grant money for their research, but saying research wouldn’t be possible without ad money is nonsense.

        Also, adding a financial incentive to upload as many videos as possible to get as many clicks and views as possible doesn’t sound like the way you encourage truthful, factual, and well-researched educational content to get shared. If anything, it would encourage a lot of low effort clickbait, misleading titles and thumbnails, opinion pieces, “edutainment” and poorly sourced material mass produced for a wide audience. Not saying that’s what happened, I’m sure there are plenty of channels that exist now thanks in part to ad revenue helping them get started and/or continue posting at regular upload intervals, but the Cobra Effect is real and people will always be finding ways to take the path of least resistance to getting their payout.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I still use it that way. Any time ive had a problem that wasn’t adequately explained by youtube or elsewhere, if I solved it myself, Id make a simple YT tutorial for it and upload it.

  • the_seven_sins@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I sometimes thought about opening a personal blog or something on the domain I own anyway (mostly to test Hugo).

    But then again, when was the last time you read a personal blog? If you want anybody to the see your stuff you’ve got to be on instagram or something.

    • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do when its posted to something like Lemmy or Hacker News, if the things you’re posting would interest those kinds of communities you’d at least have a small audience

    • psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The difference is that you own everything on your blog, but insta owns everything you post, and may save it forever.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The weirdo content creators on Newgrounds and eBaum’s World were still better than 90% of content creators that exist now.

    Hell, many of those same content creators are the 10% of the not-shit YouTube creators now

  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    People need to bring back cheesy personal websites, banners and forum signatures…

    There are still some corners online where you can find and make those, even if you don’t have the money, time or knowledge to host one yourself. For example:

    Neocities (yes it’s like Geocities)

    I am obsessed with those sites. It’s like the internet back in the day when I was a teen. I hope the social media and content creator sludge never overcomes it…

  • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not all black and white though. People in the 2000’s didn’t know that you can make a living off content creation, but people who have adopted this style usually can and will (or should) turn more effort into creating high quality videos.

    • DrGunjah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t that exactly the point of the meme? Internet 20 years ago was about sharing mostly. Internet today is about monetization mostly. And content quality isn’t what makes you big, it’s your ability to game/abuse the system

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The point of the meme is “How dare creators expect any sort of compensation for their work!? No ads! No subscriptions! Give it to us for the ‘exposure’!”

        • DrGunjah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think most people have an issue with compensation for good content, it’s just there are not a lot of monetization schemes that support this. So what you get instead of quality content is stuff like 40 minute video tutorials with 5 ad breaks about a subject that could have been explained in 5 minutes. That’s also why people tend to put reddit at the end of a google search because chances are good you find a simple post with the exact information you need instead of all the blog sites that explain the same shit in only 5003937352729 words with 300 ads inbetween that show up at the first result page because they game the seo system.

          • Ech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m very aware of the problems with weak-effort content on the Internet, and if the first half wasn’t “Cool guy pays to give away content for free”, yeah, that might be it. It’s pretty clearly not OPs intent, though.

            The system is far from perfect, but that people can now subsidize their income or replace it entirely with content creation is not a bad thing. People deserve to be compensated for their work, whether that work is for a corporation or for an audience of fans.

    • Barack_Embalmer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      “High quality” can come in the form of investing time into research, or creating visual aids that present information clearly. But it also often manifests as flashy title cards, pointless special effects, derivative humor (like frenzied jump cuts to movie clips and memes every few seconds), unnecessarily rambling intros, superfluous wall-to-wall music. I feel like many of these features are borrowed over from classical TV, to give the veneer of a highly produced “professional” product, when democratized internet media’s greatest strength is to actually free us from these conventions.

      • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah can’t argue about that. Unfortunately there are numerous amount of livelihood content creators who are making these clickbaity, mind numbing videos like ssniperwolf.

      • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Understandable association but I’m not one. Only content I’m making is some memes in a Lemmy community.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Literally poorer people, yes.

        How do you reconcile with yourself wanting people to be poor so that you aren’t even moderately inconvenienced?

  • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Normal guy in 2000”

    as someone who was into computers and in high school in 2000, that that was not normal.

    even if yo mean normal computer literate person, not even then… Most people did not run their own servers, was it more common, yeah, but it wasn’t a given.

    Things were only free if you were into piracy, everything cost money though without as much marketing, but then it wasn’t a huge market…

    Also ads were everywhere and worse…

    • Engywuck@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I considered myself a pretty “normal guy” back then and paid my domain/hosting and had a hand-written HTML+js blog/website with no ads… And plenty of “normal people” used to do that, even if it was a much smaller percentage of internetizens than nowadays.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    And that’s why I avoid YouTube like the plague. 10 minutes of BS for 2 minutes of content. Fuck google for tying adspace (video length) to search returns and suggested video priorities. More BS = more adspace = puts your garbage video at the top of the list.