Amazon Fire Tablets and other gear will reportedly switch away from Android::TVs, Echo Show, and other gear could sport Amazon’s in-house replacement soon.

  • N00dle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 year ago

    This seems like a bad plan. While Fire OS has always been an outdated mess of AOSP, it still supports large pool of apps with sideloading. This is also probably expensive to build and they continue losing large amounts with their Alexa stuff. I wish for a third option besides just Android and IOS ,but I’m not holding my breath for this being it.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, the chances of them getting any serious development going on beyond the basics is pretty low. Why would a developer add yet another platform to their workload? The ones that do double duty with iOS and Android both already complain about it being a pain in the ass.

      You’d be dealing with a new market, so any dev is going to be sinking time and work on spec, hoping it’s going to have enough users to repay their work.

      I can see the usual steaming services shrugging and adding the new platform in, but you’d need a hell of a lot more than that if they plan to switch the fire tablets away from an android base.

      Even the firestick moving away from an android base is going to alienate a lot of users. That ability to sideload stuff is a bigger draw than I think amazon realizes not a majority, no; but a big enough niche matters.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can see the usual steaming services

        Freudian slip or intentional? Either way, it’s perfect!

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The platform is React Native.

        Most programmers already know some JavaScript, even if they hate it.

        The “basics” will be any full featured website. That is hardly adding to a workload. Not exactly a new platform.

    • raptir@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re buying a tablet from them and side loading the play store they are losing money. They sell Fire tablets for a loss to encourage you to buy stuff from their ecosystem.

    • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Microsoft gave up far too easily. We should have a Windows phone.

      But the better alternate to iOS did not win. Google had the funds to push Android forward, where WebOS did not.

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honest question for everyone. And sorry if I sound biased. But does anyone’s fire tablet not run like shit? All the ones we have are slow to load, buggy, and seem full of bloat.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No, no, that’s about the Fire experience in a nutshell.

      Android’s worst offense was accidentally increasing bloatware.

      • Crit@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d blame Amazon on that one, you can get android to run pretty efficiently if you put enough time in tweaking it, look at all the custom ROMs getting modern android versions running on old phones and tablets.

    • RiQuY@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Easier to monopolize the apps you install on their devices.

      • yiliu@informis.land
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        That works if you’re dominant in the market, and you have companies rushing to make software for your platform. If you’re not, you end up as an also-ran platform with a handful of half-baked ports (like every “smart TV”).

  • machinin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kind of off topic, but can anyone suggest an alternative to Google TV? I have an old version that is fine, but this i recently purchased one with the new UI and it is horrible. I haven’t tried replacing the home app yet, but will try soon.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Amazon has been working on an in-house replacement for its Android-based Fire OS, codenamed “Vega” and built for easier app development, according to reporting from Janko Roettgers at Lowpass.

    This could simplify development for Fire devices alongside other React-ready platforms, including smartphones, desktops, and other smart TVs.

    Vega could start shipping on Fire TV devices as early as next year, according to Roettgers’ sources.

    From there, the web-minded OS could move onto Echo smart displays, Fire tablets, and then future Amazon efforts, like in-car entertainment systems.

    Roettgers notes that with a custom OS, Amazon could better control the deployment of advertising and paid services to “a wide range of inexpensive devices.”

    There’s an enthusiastic community built around buying Fire tablets for their economy-cheating low price, then side-loading the Play Store and other Google services onto them (and even restricting Amazon’s advertising presence on them).


    The original article contains 512 words, the summary contains 144 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!