• spudwart@spudwart.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Pros: As an effect of him writing the script in the 90s, the movie feels like a 90s movie with modern fx.

    Cons: As an effect of him writing the script in the 90s, the movie feels like a 90s movie, with ancient overdone tropes, including the racist ones.

      • 1simpletailer@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean the Na’vi are an infantilized hodgepodge of several shallow stereotypes of indigenous people precision designed to be sexy so the lowest common denominator sympathizes with them. The commenter may be referring to that.

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago
            • The manner in which they talk
            • the lack of technology greater than bows and arrows
            • all plants and animals are treated as sacred
            • outsiders are not welcome
            • clothing that only covers up the naughty bits

            The Na’vi are basically native American stereotypes in every conceivable way, except blue and have tails.

            • IdealShrew@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Is that not all true even for some tribes today? I don’t mean native American, but for example look at the people on Sentinel Island or similar - I think this is what they were going for with the NaVi

  • Rin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m assuming the sequel is also forgettable considering that I’ve barely heard a thing about the plot.

      • HexBee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        No no no no, it doesn’t just have a plot. It has the same plot even with all the same protagonists and antagonists.

        • credit crazy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Someone better get him out of his sub the air is making him a bit loopy enough to think avatar 2 is a good plot

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The sequel is literally “the exact same movie as the first one, but this time with water (and bonus animal cruelty)”

      I actually enjoyed the first one, but the second movie added nothing of value and cheapened everything that happened in the first one (in that literally no one gives a shit about unobtanium anymore)

      Edit: Curious as to what the downvoters are taking issue with about my comment. Nothing wrong with liking the movie, but you have to admit the plot was basically identical to the first one, just with new characters and a different setting

  • thorbot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    My wife and I started watching the second avatar and we turned it off about 90 minutes in, just couldn’t be bothered to care or watch it any more. And we never finished it. What a piece of crap

    • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Watched it in IMAX 3d with my kid. It ruled, so much fun to watch. Will never watch it again though, and certainly never at home. That defeats the entire purpose.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        We even went to a new “4D” room where the seats moved, you got wind and mist etc. It’s like a thrill ride at that point almost.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is precisely it. Avatar had originally the exact same problem that the Way of the Water has now. They’re tech demos. Interesting, pretty, they move people to see what’s what on the theater. But, offer close to nothing emotionally or culturally resonant. It’s like a generic roller-coaster, you show up, enjoy the ride, then go get some fries having nothing deeper to say about the experience because the experience doesn’t offer anything deep. It doesn’t mean the movies are bad or that they weren’t enjoyable, that’s why they made so much money. But there’s no conversation to have around them except to remark on how much they cost to make, or how did the CGI looked like or whether other studios will use the tech invented for this movie on other movies. Plot, characters and symbolism are shallow pools. Specially to an audience that is sick and tired of mega blockbuster sequels.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Made three out of the top four grossing movies of all time.

    I don’t really like any of them, but you can’t argue with the results. The man knows how to put bums on cinema seats.

  • kttnpunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was such a bad movie too. Dude was really just like “let’s remake the first movie, but wetter”

  • doktorseven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve always called bullshit on the second movie making that much damn money. There’s no way. Not nearly that many people cared about it at all, I seriously think somebody faked that attendance.

    • Belgdore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The franchise is huge in China. Just because your group didn’t like it doesn’t mean they are faking anything

      • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Im apparently the only person on the face of mother earth who genuinely liked the first movie… I did, no really. But the second one literally had nothing of interest in it. It looked the same, sounded the same, had the same characters and all that, but the movie when nowhere for 3 hours. I dont think I can ever sit through it again.

  • Bonehead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    So it may have taken 13 years to come back with a sequel that no one asked for and no one expected. But at least he gave us something. Unlike a certain South African director that shall remain nameless…3 years my ass…

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    He can’t keep getting away with it!

    I feel like there was a good movie in Avatar 2 but a lot of the scenes looked like they didn’t render them fully. The FPS changes felt random. If they’d done ALL action in 48 and ALL dialogue in 24 it wouldn’t have been as bad.

    The scenes of the kids rescuing the parents were so gorgeous. Stunning. But compare that to the scene of the boat jumping and crashing? Insane how shitty it looked.