TL;DR: “I will stay a Republican because I loooooove their terrible policies”
An article about politics being a “team sport” with a “I agree with all of the policies of my team” cherry on top.
they’re hurting the people I want to hurt!
And then later:
who could have known they would have started hurting me after they ran out of brown people/non-“Christians”/LGBTQ+/women who I don’t personally know and like?
Yup, all that bullshit and it was 2016 that made her think differently, not 2003 when we invaded Iraq to make GWB richer?
The Author states
No, I remain a Republican because I agree with the party’s stated positions on the free market, school choice, a balanced budget, low taxes, fewer regulations and tariffs, protecting unborn babies, encouraging personal responsibility, maintaining a strong presence in the world, enforcing rule of law, and upholding the Constitution.
Your comment reeks of the very same blatant partisanship that the modern republican party suffers from, or what I call ‘team spirit’. The policies he lists seem anti-welfare and democratic.
I criticize the Republican Party as they are anti-democratic and isolationist as well as favouring the prison system over education and rehabilitation. This keeping them on the very welfare system they want to reduce. Some other policies benefit companies too much also such as the school choice.
Had Republicans continued to focus on problem solving instead of obstructionism, perhaps I’d be more inclined to vote for them
But when the hammer swings the other way, I hope that the rest of America will learn the lessons of the 20s: both in the 20th and 21st centuries
A real quick ctrl+A and a copy to the clipboard got the article, it’s as follows:
Dave Granlund, PoliticalCartoons.com By KRISTA KAFER | Columnist for The Denver Post September 25, 2023 at 9:27 a.m. “Are you going to change your party affiliation to Democrat?” a friend asked.
I had sparked the question by repeating my joke that had gone viral on social media about a certain Colorado congresswoman having a ball at a Denver playhouse while her lover stayed abreast of the plotline.
Surely when an elected representative to Congress engages in a little heavy petting, vaping, videotaping, and other obnoxious behavior at a sold-out musical with children present, a few jokes are warranted. Family values-touting Congresswoman Lauren Boebert has issued an apology but then she shamelessly told One America News Network it was her “animated personality” that got her kicked out of the theatre.
That’s all fair game for jest, no matter your political party.
But my joke didn’t even garner a smile, not because it was puerile, he’d guffawed plenty at my Congressman Anthony Weiner puns; it was because Boebert is a fellow Republican. “Democrats have done worse. We’re just catching up,” he replied.
For too many Americans politics is a team sport, not the philosophical exercise it is for us policy nerds. When a teammate makes a foul, we’re expected to ignore it or do a little pro bono comms work to justify it. I was being disloyal.
Human beings are groupish by nature. While one can live an atomized existence today, for much of human existence, ostracization from family and clan meant a lonely and untimely death. The need to belong is thus strongly ingrained. That’s why we virtue signal our allegiance to group norms and consider the other tribe’s misdeeds more grievous than our own. In our estimation, their actions get the magnifying glass; ours get the rose-colored filter of good intentions.
For much of my adult life, if asked which political party was more virtuous, I would have said my own. I had evidence: Democrats made craven excuses for Bill Clinton’s affair with a White House intern. Their leaders lied about public policies and impugned good people. They lectured piously about global warming while flying about in private jets. Sure, there are good Democrats, I would have said, but as a group they are more likely to ignore ethical breaches and rank hypocrisy; they believe the ends justify the means.
It took the 2016 election to set me straight. Watching the same people who criticized Clinton embrace Donald Trump was deeply disconcerting. His lies, they said, were mere exaggerations, theater. Lighten up. No one is perfect. Democrats have done far worse. Stop quibbling about the means, focus on ends — winning for once!
Ostracization from a group is psychologically painful but it does clear the head. I know now what should have been obvious all along: people are the same everywhere. Interest trumps ideology. Allegiance clouds our assessment of our own actions and those of our opponents. It’s not a Republican or Democrat thing; it’s human nature.
I have a single standard for behavior without respect to party and I regularly ask myself “how would I feel if the other side did what my side did?” or “if my side did what the other side just did?” It allows me to see past my loyalties.
In fact, it was one of the key questions I asked myself when deciding to participate in a lawsuit challenging former President Donald Trump’s eligibility to run for office again. If a Democrat had attempted to overturn the results of an election by spreading lies, by trying to cajole and intimidate election officials into undermining the process, by fomenting a mob that tried to halt the democratic process through violent means, by delaying action to stop the attack, and by promising to pardon the insurrectionists, would I want Democrats to take these actions seriously?
The answer was yes. Would I want Democrats to uphold the 14th Amendment’s proscription against such actions? Again, yes. Could I ask of others, what I would not ask of myself? No, I could not. I cannot.
To my friend’s question, does my criticism of GOP leaders’ conduct mean I intend to change my party affiliation? No, I remain a Republican because I agree with the party’s stated positions on the free market, school choice, a balanced budget, low taxes, fewer regulations and tariffs, protecting unborn babies, encouraging personal responsibility, maintaining a strong presence in the world, enforcing rule of law, and upholding the Constitution.
Krista L. Kafer is a weekly Denver Post columnist. Follow her on Twitter: @kristakafer
Ugh, literally Leopards Ate My Face…
Damn that’s a whole thing, wow! Pretty hilarious and spot on too.
LOL at this turd calling liberals hypocrites. Forest for the fucking trees.
Edit: ruh roh, the hypocrites found us.
Paywalled, but there’s a way over the wall: https://archive.ph/yEaIi
That archive site is cancer. They block cloudfire and google DNS out of hand.
Basically, half the internet will get stuck on an infinite captcha when they try to use that site.
Archive.org is the good one. (the .ph or whatever domain they use today is not associated with the .org)
I’ll have to try it out on my other machine - pretty much, IIRC - Chrome works, FF does not - and I think neither work if I use VPN. If there is a site that is not a PITA to use to enter pages for archival, I’ll be more likely to use it, but yeah, as is, the one I was trying to use is pretty much unworkable for me. I don’t want to be forced to use Chrome w/ no VPN just for an archive site…
Paywall.
Paywalled. :(
>laughing
They are jacking it to her.
Re: stupid paywalls
I FINALLY figured out how to get around this. Adblock browser on Android had a turn off JavaScript option which mostly worked but was a pain in the ass to toggle and the app hogged my data. ANYWAY.
There’s an android app called firefox nightly “for developers” that lets you create custom collections for addons. This allows you to use the bypass paywalls addon that isn’t listed on mobile Firefox. I’m trying to find the url for the tutorial I used.
