• LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    1 year ago

    “We’re trying to create a safe and loving home.”

    “Wow, so what you’re saying is you won’t love me if I come in and release millions of angry wasps in your home? Have fun in your echo chamber, I guess.”

    • seahorse [Ohio]@midwest.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Just because you disagree that minorities should be wiped off the face of the earth doesn’t mean you have to cancel me”

            • Inevitable Waffles [Ohio]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              “In our latest innovation, we have added sound baffling to the echo chambers. The upshot is now people can hear themselves and nothing else, as requested. This helps narcissists keep out of others way and let people get on with their lives… What’s the downside, you ask? Oh… Well, the downside is that everyone else is predicted to suffer psychosis. Well, predict to suffer it 62% faster than now… Anyways, mission accomplished!” /s

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe we should start an equally extreme movement on the left so that the centrist actually know what the centre is supposed to be.

          “Minorities should be our supreme leaders, that enslaves the majority”

          • norbert@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s getting to this point. The left need to start arming themselves and agitate for what we want. The over the decades the right-wing shifted right. To counter this the democratic party shifted right as well in an attempt to court the “undecided” voters.

            This has failed spectacularly and they just alienated their actual base. Now the country has shifted right and the true leftists are left with little to no representation.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 year ago

    They appeal to tolerance because we value it, not because they do. Once they have power they won’t practice the tolerance towards differences in opinion they demand.

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Once they have power they won’t practice the tolerance

      Well duh. They don’t even pretend to practice tolerance when they don’t have power.

    • a1mlezz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      No paradox once you stop viewing tolerance a principle and start viewing it as a social contract; only those that keep it are covered by it.

  • Seudo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.—In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.

    The Paradox of Tolerance,
    Karl Popper,
    1945.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s worth noting that what Karl Popper most likely meant by intolerance is something like “forbid their followers to listen to rational argument … teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols” rather than any broader meaning of the term, and is here explicitly giving credit to the value of rational debate.

    • yumpsuit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Michael Jordan would’ve had greater success taking back the toothbrush mustache if he carried a rocket launcher.

      • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know if it’s from WORMS but the over exaggerating weapons with the worm like head coming from the ground only bring me to that conclusion

  • soviettaters@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I have no sympathy for Tankies. Their ideology has caused the death of tens of millions and we should not allow that to happen again just for the sake of “tolerance”.