X’s new terms of service insist that tweets are now posts::X is rolling out a new terms of service on September 29th, and one adjustment is a single instance of “retweet” to “repost.” There are other changes regarding data scraping and class action lawsuits.

  • Zeppo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    ·
    1 year ago

    This guy throws away one of the most famous brands in the entire world and then says “uh, it’s the Jews!”. Out of all the incredibly stupid things he has said, I still find “And soon we shall bid adieu to the twitter brand and, gradually, all the birds.” especially irritating.

      • SecretSauce@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Isn’t because the courts made him do it after he definitely very seriously said he would buy it? Honestly I’ve kinda lost track of the details at this point and am just enjoying watching the worlds slowest train smash from afar

          • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            He didn’t just say he was going to buy it, he signed a legally binding contract and waived his right to back out of the deal, and then tried to anyway lmao, what a fucking dumbass child man

          • dhork@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            The board sued because the insane price he proposed was a much better monetary outcome for shareholders than waiting for Twitter itself to become profitable. But was a much worse outcome for its employees, users, and the rest of us…

            • TehWorld@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              Gonna go ahead and say that this is the BEST outcome for the rest of us. Employees and vendors for Twitter got the short end of the straw, but society as a whole would be blessed if Twitter went the way of the Dodo bird.

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh those poor poor “users”. Remember kids, if you’re not paying for the service, you’re not the user, you’re the product.

  • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nothing says marketing genius like throwing away one of the most recognisable brands in the industry and replacing it with “X”

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      When your brand gets to the point where it turns into a verb why on earth would you ever torpedo that?

      It’s like if Google changed their name to “search” and prodded people to say “just search it” instead of “just google it”.

  • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow, that’s… exceedingly boring.

    Imagine buying some of the most recognized branding in the world and tossing it all away. Couldn’t be me.

    • Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      I keep wondering what was the asset that Elon bought that was worth $44B? The brand? No, he flushed that down the toilet. The technology? No, he was crapping all over that from day one. The staff? No, he fired most of them. Twitter had no real estate. What was THE THING he paid $44B for?

      • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        What was THE THING he paid $44B for?

        The only guess I can make is the private jet tracker, which he Streisanded into a subreddit where it will live forever. Lmao.

        • Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess the user base. But he was also shitting all over that saying it was mostly bots. You could say it was a strategy to bring the price down, but he still paid $44B so that didn’t work.

  • Chud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s a low stakes conspiracy. Musk went all in on the “Birds aren’t real” thing, and is now trying to erase birds from the internet.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Enjoy the show, this pyre is fucking massive. Literally turned a brand that became engrained into culture and destroyed it in record time.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m still convinced, this all came out because he was butt-hurt about plane tracking and other things, also a convenient dump for Tesla stocks people keep thinking he cares about twitter like the users do, for him, it’s prob just Tuesday

    • Cabrio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like the idea that people at Space X and Tesla dropped Twitter in the corpo baby’s lap so that he’d be distracted from the nice toys.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also a lot of left-leaning discourse happened there, from American liberals to actual-left communists. The Arab Spring had a lot of coordination happen there (hence the Saudi’s involvement) and the power-hungry capital owners of the world were probably getting tired of being called out. So Elon took one for the team, probably thinking best case he could get bailed out, worst case he could destroy the “public square” that hated on him so much.

      Now the site is just garbage on top of garbage and everyone is looking elsewhere. If he was gonna be forced to buy it, he sure wasn’t just gonna let the above slide…

      • gerryflap@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been thinking this as well. I mean, at this point I don’t see any reason why else he could’ve reasonably done this. Either he’s making no sense, or it’s something like this. Twitter stood for many things he’s against, and he has just completely ruined it

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Hated on him”?

        There was definitely a contingent that did that, but for the most part, Musk had been pretty much invulnerable to criticism, with thousands of fanbois ready to jump to his defence. He’s brought pretty much all of this on himself since he took it over, he’s hurt his own brand way more than Xitter’s.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    X has now become just like any other social media platform. Posts are just called “posts” just like anywhere else.

    Looks like Elon Musk has become the Elongated Muskrat once again.

  • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    So if they have publicly abandoned the Twitter brand identity, can someone else use it?

    Because a lot of people are ready for a retro clone.

    • J12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Start calling everything posted online a tweet and eventually it’ll become a generic trademark.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Users are starting to see pop-ups about new terms that go into effect on September 29th, and one adjustment is two instances of “retweet” (the only use of “tweet” in the current terms) to “repost,” essentially putting the final stamp in the death of the word tweet.

    There are a bunch of other branding changes in the new terms, including a nearly wholesale removal of the word “Twitter” in favor of X. I say nearly wholesale because, hilariously, many of the URLs included in the terms still seemingly have to include the word “twitter,” like in this link to a developer-focused website: https://developer.x.com/en/docs/twitter-for-websites.

    There have been some hints that X wants to fully switch over to URLs starring X, but it seems Twitter will hang around in some capacity.

    References to Periscope, Twitter’s live streaming app it shut down in 2021, have been removed as well.

    Another change moves language about misusing Twitter’s services to a new section, and updates it in a pointed ban against scraping, something that X owner Elon Musk really doesn’t like.

    X is also planning to put a new privacy policy into place on September 29th.


    The original article contains 323 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 41%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!