Summary

Donald Trump declared on Truth Social that he was voiding Joe Biden’s pardons for Jan. 6 committee members, calling them “VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT.”

He claimed Biden’s use of an autopen made the pardons invalid, citing unproven claims from The Heritage Foundation. Legal experts note that a president cannot revoke a predecessor’s pardons.

Biden issued them to shield officials from politically motivated investigations.

Trump, who has repeatedly threatened prosecutions, accused the committee members of wrongdoing and suggested they be investigated.

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    15 days ago

    So we are to believe that each J6 felon Trump pardoned was signed by hand in something other than Sharpie?

    Also why bother with the investigations, they investigated Biden for 4 years and despite the “overwhelming evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors” they couldn’t even name one, let alone provide evidence. This is just Trump trying to get his base focused on something other than how he is screwing them despite their support.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      15 days ago

      Don’t even engage with the “wrong kind of pen” argument. It’s a prime example of fascists wasting your time debating words spoken in bad faith to distract you while they round people up in the streets.

      • gabbath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        Obligatory Sartre quote:

        Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

    • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      15 days ago

      focused on something other

      Perhaps how constituents got absolutely hammered by extreme weather, tornados, etc, over the weekend as he simultaneously dismantles weather science funding and aid, while also denying that climate change is an issue. Or possibly deporting legal immigrants, against specific instructions not to, in some real transparent dictator type behavior.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Honestly, at this point, people can deny it all they want but climate change isn’t something that “might happen” it’s already happening and will continue to happen because we’re doing our damnedest to make sure it does. I’m in socal and the climate here is already markedly different from what it was ten years ago.

        • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 days ago

          The honest problem is that the hyper-wealthy just don’t go outside or do anything meaningful. They are in climate controlled buildings and vehicles 24/7. They don’t cook. They don’t feel price fluctuations in goods. Their home(s) are numerous and in the best areas, but even that is moot, as they are rarely at home. They travel and work constantly, and are never subjected to anything but the finest accomodations. Their world is very controlled, and orderly, and pleasant. They literally live in a different reality. They don’t get it. And yet, they control the environment us regular people live in/are subjected to. Our struggles are trivia to them. Mere inconveniences. We’re just obstacles in their way. Our displeasure is just a “notification” to clear. Whatever they can do to shut us up, or get us off their case, they do that. Right and wrong be damned. The future be damned. By the time it effects them directly and they are forced to deal with consequences, our corpses will be components of massive burning heaps.

  • PapaSkwat@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    15 days ago

    That’s it Diaper Don, leave yourself no way out by questioning the legality of pardons. True genius at work here.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      15 days ago

      The only way this goes wrong for him is if he leaves office. He has no intention of allowing that to happen.

  • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    15 days ago

    So if auto pens mean that the document isn’t valid, does that mean the same thing for DocuSign, or other e signatures?

    Does this mean that billions of contracts and documents signed this way are null and void?

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      How is DocuSign supposed to be a signature anyway? It’s not your handwriting, and there’s no cryptographic proof either.

      Check out e-signatures like we do them in Estonia. The document has a cryptographic signature belonging to the person who signed it, with a date. Change the file in the container and the signature is no longer valid. It makes physical signatures pretty much obsolete because it’s easy to use and WAY easier to prove that the signature is not fake.

      There are issues of course - someone who knows your PIN2 could steal your device and sign something before you can get the certificate revoked. You do need to keep your PINs secure.

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    15 days ago

    “The necessary Pardoning Documents were not explained to, or approved by, Biden,” Trump added. “He knew nothing about them…"

    Funny enough we could just ask Biden about this, and even given an outright ‘yeah, knew, read, and would do it again’ Trump would spin up some other excuse to say it was fake, or a clone, or whatever other madness comes to mind.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      15 days ago

      But in the Conservative Cinematic Universe, Biden is a doddering old fool who is unaware of his surroundings. This is God’s Own Truth, and nobody will convince them otherwise.

      If you ask Biden about this, on camera, and he responds, they will conclude it must be an AI fake, or possibly a Robot Biden. Then they will freeze-frame on some instance where he is looking in the distance and insist he was sundowning.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    15 days ago

    Considering how lazy he is I don’t know if he wants to set a precedent for all government documents signed with an auto-pin being invalid. Not that precedent has ever mattered for republicans

  • Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    15 days ago

    Everybody go on social media and proclaim Trump isn’t president. Musk’s kid said so

  • kikutwo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 days ago

    Hilarious to bemoan autopen when this senile imbecile is signing everything looking like Hammmmmmmy Sammmmmiieeess.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    There’s nothing that says Presidential Pardons need to be in writing. Biden just had to direct the right people to offer a pardon to an individual which can then be accepted or declined. That can be verbal, electronically communicated, or in writing, but a signature from the President is just a formality and definitely not required, so the autopen/esign argument is a totally dead argument.

    Just more criminal conduct from the felon in chief.