• sqgl@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Or it was all according to the artist’s plan anyhow.

      Not that I would be surprised if the artist never cared about animal rights in the first place.

      • Ekky@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah, this feels like just another of those artists who want to sow discord for fame, without actually caring about the real topic they throw under the bus in doing so.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Or it was all according to the artist’s plan anyhow.

        IMO, that’s still something a psychopath / Batman villain would do.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    This stunt reminds me of the show Bellas Artes, which is about a museum director struggling to cope with his new job.

    In the third episode, an artist sets up an installation using a large, dead marine animal as the centerpiece to draw attention to broader ecological neglect. The kicker is that not only is the animal quickly rotting, causing a huge commotion with the press and putting everyone on edge, but a big part of the intended artwork is the shit show that followed—something the artist anticipated. The artist wanted the whale to rot and stink up the place, close the museum, and give the media a field day. All of the artist’s actions and intentions led to the museum director’s epiphany about what the piece was really about.

    And that’s exactly how I feel about this. People arguing that the piglets were “left to starve” are missing the point. Setting up the crime scene and rescuing the piglets is all part of the show.

  • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The piglets were being denied food and water and would have been allowed to starve to death.

    Does Denmark not have animal cruelty laws?

  • Nooch@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I think that was supposed to happen, and the best outcome here. The piece is thought provoking and brings up the question why people would care about these pigs in the first place considering how little we regard the life of a pigglet (imo).

      • Kacarott@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Is a slow agonizing death really any worse than an agonizing life followed by a quick death?

        Animals used for food should be treated humanely their entire lives, not just in the moment of death. However many would argue that raising animals for food at all is already inherently inhumane.