• Embargo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m in Australia and I would like to say something about that. Come at us you stupid fascist cunt.

  • kayazere@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Strange, Big Tech has no inherit right to operate in foreign markets. If they want to be in those markets, they need to pay their fair share. I would be glad to see them pull out of those markets, but that won’t easily happen.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Think of it on the flipside. If I make a website, I don’t control who accesses it, and if I run ads or something, figuring out where that revenue is coming from is quite difficult. It can be done, but if I have to pay taxes to a hundred different countries, that’s quite the burden.

      I don’t know how DSTs work in practice, but ideally we’d just discourage ads in general. Paying taxes on actual transactions (sub fees and whatnot) is easy, and ads suck.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 months ago

    I desperately desperately desperately want to read a headline that says “Ukraine signs rare mineral agreement with the European Union. Ukraine becomes a member of the EU and the EU gets large resources of rare minerals to supercharge their own homegrown tech industry and divest it from the United States of Trump”

  • puppinstuff@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    2 months ago

    Part of the reason why I’ve recommended US based services to my Canadian clients was because of its speed due to proximity. Now that net neutrality has been gutted and ISPs are free to artificially slow down their services a la carte, the speed advantage is questionable. Now I recommend services in Canada where I find them and European alternatives when no closer ones are available.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t pick based on country of origin, I pick based on privacy and other features. Unfortunately, that seems to knock out most US based services, which is sad because I’m American.

  • plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    2 months ago

    Thanks Mr Trump - this really helps us sell our non-US technology to the Europeans. Keep on making stuff great again 🤘

  • Absaroka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s almost like Trump when to a seminar on the incredible healing power of tariffs, and believed every word he heard.

  • SavageCoconut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Lol, Trump is a clown. If netflix or other big tech is charging me for using their service in my country, and they have legal presence and activity in my country, they should be charged taxes in my country because they are generating econimic activity.

    • Balder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s exactly how I felt when Bolsonaro was in power in Brazil. He at least became ineligible for being responsible for our equivalent of the capitol invasion in Brasília, and is possibly going to jail.

      It still baffles me that the US is supposed to be a country where laws work more strictly, and yet everything Trump did in his previous term—from obstruction of justice to inciting the January 6th Capitol riot—seems to have been met with limited accountability. How can a nation uphold its democratic principles if the mechanisms designed to check power are perceived as being selectively applied?

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        where laws work more strictly

        That’s never been the case. If anything we’ve been a major source of corruption on the world and particularly for South America for the last 150-200 years. Shit you could easily frame the Cuban revolution and the reaction to American corrupt interests and draw a straight line from drug cartels and bribing coups as well.

      • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, technically, we have a federal republic.

        While there is supposed to be a division of powers, because it was combined with the first past the post system, it becomes a split political mess, because the combinatorics virtually guaranteed this outcome at some point.

        Additionally, instead of a parliamentary republic, just like Brazil, we have the presidential system, which leads to the same problems you guys got with Bolsanaro. Quite literally everything you hear in the media and by our government regarding democracy is and has been propaganda. States have some democratic processes, but for the large part that’s not even true.

        The founding fathers were of course aware of all this. They just figured it was useful while separating from Britain and establishing the country, and over time it would better itself because enlightened individuals would remain in power dedicated towards “the more perfect Republic.”

        Obviously that didn’t happen and here we are.

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 months ago

    “It’s time to be tough on Big Tech! And by tough, I mean I’m going to give Bezos, Musk, Zuckerberg and all the rest the most vigorous blowjobs they have ever felt!” -Dumpy Trumpy

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    He’s like that over confident political blowhard on the internet who picked up on one term used in policy at some point and tried to wedge it in as the appropriate answer to everything.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sort of except the fact that he wants to be a dictator. Tariffs require no approval from Congress and it’s the only peaceful offensive weapon he has at his disposal.

      He knows better (at least let’s hope he does) than to send troops anywhere for 90 days.

    • Wojwo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well has anything trump has said sounded well thought out. He’s like the villain from Meet the Robinsons

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      The EU established an ACI (Anti-cooersion instrument) in 2023 that would be devastating to US interests.

      Included in their response would be the suspension of all US intellectual property rights in Europe.

  • RecallMadness@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    He didn’t say anything about regulating them.

    Tax revenue is small fry compared to the harm they can (and do?) cause.