• CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 months ago

    Funnily enough the guy who invented MP3 earned enough from royalties to barely afford a regular house in Germany. Meanwhile Apple made billions and rose like a phoenix from the ashes thanks to Apple Music and the iPod that rely on this format.

          • ⛓️‍💥@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It’s really confusing.

            The .m4a extension is commonly used for audio only MP4 (container) files. m4a files are capable of carrying other audio codecs other than AAC.

            The .acc extension seems to mean very little. It indicates that the file contains a AAC stream but the container is not defined. Could be MP4, could be 3GP could be a raw AAC stream.

            The concept of file extensions really break down when it comes to audio and video files. A single media file could contain a dozen audio streams in a dozen formats.

            webm files really are nothing but mkv files in which the audio/video codecs are limited to a certain subset. You can “convert” a webm to a mkv by renaming the file.

            • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The concept of file extensions really break down when it comes to audio and video files

              Honestly anywhere other than windows they start getting a bit funky since most ecosystems don’t actually rely on the filename to determine the file type

              It also doesn’t help that so many file types are just a bunch of text files shoved into a zip file wearing a mask. It’s all abstractions all the way down baby!

    • blackberry@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      do you think would influence developers to make their projects open source, with more leaning towards copy left licenses? they won’t make much money off the code alone anyways, so might as well try to make others not profit either

  • nyan@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s useful because it’s ubiquitous. Everything that can take in music files supports it.

    Is MP3-encoded audio of the best possible quality? No, of course not. But for most people it’s Good Enough, especially if you do most of your listening in a noisy environment. MP3s are to lossless formats what CD was to vinyl for so many years.

    • bokherif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      A lot of people cant tell the difference between MP3 @320Kbps and a fully lossless FLAC.

      • Kogasa@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        All people. 320kbps mp3 is completely audibly transparent under all normal listening conditions. It’s a low-tier audiophile meme to claim otherwise but they will never pass a double-blind test.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        A lot of people cant tell the difference between MP3 @320Kbps and a fully lossless FLAC.

        MP3 has some disadvantages over more modern formats, regardless the used bitrate. It’s been a long while since I was very interested in audio formats, so I may not be up to date on some newer developments but unless anything major changed, MP3 can’t do truly gapless playback between tracks (used in live albums), for example.

        • nixcamic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Aren’t there unofficial extensions to mp3 for gappless playback? IIRC you can tag tracks as gappless and many audio players will make them so.

          • woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Aren’t there unofficial extensions to mp3 for gappless playback?

            Yes and no.

            IIRC an MP3 track is divided in fixed-length frames and unless the actual audio matches perfectly with the end of a frame, it’s not possible and that’s why cross-fading plugins for audio players were invented. The padding data is there either way but can be documented in the metadata section of a file.

            Last I checked (and that was years ago, so I may be wrong) this approach was never perfect and prone to breaking. It’s an inherent flaw with the format where some form of workaround exists.

            That said, for most use cases this is irrelevant.

            • Not a replicant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              Audio playback is such a low-demand process, surely a player (e.g.VLC) can spare a thread to line up playback of track 2, a few seconds before track 1 ends? It knows the exact length of the track, why can’t track 2 be initiated when the audio level in track 1 drops to zero (or minus infinity dB) in the last frame?

              • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Workarounds in a specific player don’t negate the fact that the format has limitations.

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d argue you’ve got that backwards; CD is to vinyl what lossless is to .mp3. That said, I know what you mean.

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Vinyl is lossy in that any dust or scratches on the record can be heard in the output, so this is only true if you’ve got an absolutely pristine vinyl.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The original idea behind the superiority of vinyl was that the ambient audio was being recorded directly to the media. Of course, this wasn’t even true when it was first made, as they were using magnetic tape by then to record in analog. However, there is still some merit to the idea that an infinitesimal amount of quality is lost when translating sound waves to digital data.

        Most of the actual differences between cd and vinyl, though, can be chalked up to the loudness wars ruining the mixes on cd.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        CDs can, by a very narrow margin, reproduce sounds beyond which the human ear can detect. There’s a theorem that states you can perfectly reproduce a waveform by sampling if the bitrate is double the maximum frequency or something like that, and CDs use a bitrate such that it can produce just above the human hearing range. You can’t record an ultrasonic dog whistle on a CD, it won’t work.

        It’s functionally impossible to improve on “red book” CD Digital Audio quality because it can perfectly replicate any waveform that has been band-passed filtered to 20,000 Hz or thereabouts. Maybe you can talk about dynamic range or multi-channel (CDs are exactly stereo. No mono, no 5.1 surround…Stereo.) It’s why there really hasn’t been a new disc format; no one needs one. It was as good as the human ear can do in the early 80’s and still is.

      • SquiffSquiff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is what we were all told for years and years- that it was impossible that anyone could hear anything in vinyl that was supposed to be there but that couldn’t be reproduced with digital at cd quality. Then DVD came out And people could genuinely hear the difference from CD quality audio even in stereo. It turns out that dynamic range is limited by the audio sampling rate and the human ear can easily detect a far greater range CD audio supports.

        • 486@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It turns out that dynamic range is limited by the audio sampling rate and the human ear can easily detect a far greater range CD audio supports.

          Dynamic range isn’t limited by the sampling rate. It is limited by the resolution, which is 16 bits for the audio CD. With that resolution you get a dynamic range of 96 dB when not using any dithering and even more than that when using dithering. Even with “only” 96 dB that dynamic range is so vast, that there is no practical use of a higher resolution when it comes to playback. I know that the human ear is supposed to be able to handle 130 dB or even more of dynamic range. The thing is, you can only experience such a dynamic range once, afterwards you are deaf. So not much point in such a dynamic range there.

          There are good reasons to use a higher resolution when recording and mixing audio, but for playback and storage of the finished audio 16 bits of resolution is just fine.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I thought it didn’t sound any different to me too. That is until me and a friend were riding around listening to Icky Thump by The White Stripes for a few weeks when it first came out.

      Higher bitrate, ripped directly from the CD, pretty decent car radio.

      We had been listening to my copy, he didn’t own it yet.

      We stopped at a record store one day when we were out and he picked up his copy. He wanted to play the CD for whatever reason, and when he stuck the disc in, “berderwiddledod dahta dah BOOM BOOM BOOM”.

      I couldn’t believe it. It was like the record just sucked the power out of us both and used it to burst through the speakers.

      The mp3, by comparison, sounded shrunk down from the source and splashed with water.

      It didn’t change my listening habits because of convenience, but damn. It was an eye opener.

      • Rogue@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is it definitely the MP3 format at fault here? Was your MP3 from an official source or could it have been from a faulty source or improperly transcoded?

          • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            IIRC that era of iPods had issues with their preamps. I remember when I switched from a Nano to a classic that there was noticeable clipping and other distortion where there wasn’t before. I would have returned it but I had already sold my Nano…

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Could it be the sound system? Most people seem to prefer the convenience of Bluetooth, ubiquitous small speakers, and maybe that’s usually the limiting factor.

        I stopped trying to keep up with a good sound system when my little ones decided to stuff matchbox cars into the port on my subwoofer. However I do a little set up from Bluetooth with AirTunes/Sonos, so I don’t know if the difference would be apparent. My car is by far my best sound system

    • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thought so too, but once I got IEMs. The drums felt more organic and I heard parts of guitars that I didn’t on mp3.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am very slightly annoyed that people haven’t moved onto Opus which gives you better compression and quality than MP3. MP3s are still useful for any older devices that have hardware decoding like radio sets, handheld players, etc. Otherwise, every modern device should support Opus out of box.

    Hilariously, x264 has the same problem where there are direct upgrades with H.265 and AV1, but the usage is still low due to lack of hardware accelerated encoding (especially AV1), but like everyone uses FLAC for the audio which is lossless lol.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I just use ogg vorbis and vp9 in webm container, also webp for images. No proprietary nonsense in this house. AV1 sucks on my hardware, but yes eventually.

    • TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I use it to (re)compress audiobooks, podcasts and such, they still sound very good at 32 kbps.
      Fun fact, Opus has been supported by a hobby OS like MorphOS for years, my ancient hardware doesn’t break a sweat playing it.

  • thechaoticchicken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sounds fine at good bitrates, universally supported, small, efficient, everywhere.

    Yeah, MP3 is just fine. Found zero reason to use any other format. And of course, while the rest of the world streams everything I’ll be happily using my massive MP3 library I can fit on a tiny little storage device and take everywhere I go without the need for the interbutts and big brother keeping tabs of what I listen to.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I used to think this but the convenience won out. Now over holiday break, my teen discovered my crate of CDs that he doesn’t remember seeing in his lifetime!

      And now I need to decide whether to buy a CD or DVD player to transfer to a more usable format - the last one I had was an old Xbox that is no longer with us

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Find somewhere that accepts/generates ewaste and you might be able to score an internal CD/DVD drives. We were doing some reorganizing at work and I saw a literal box full of 5.25" drives

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s a great idea, especially since I’m also trying to purge old stuff

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t use any one format. No idea what audio formats I have but probably a lot. Never cared, VLC takes them all.

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 months ago

    Podcasts are almost exclusively mp3. There is no need for lossless fidelity on those. And when you are subscribed to 200 podcasts like I am a small file size matters. And when listening at 2.5x speed lossless is a complete waste.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      All my podcasts appear to use the AAC spoken audio profile? It’s much smaller and cleaner than MPEG layer 3 audio.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        Apple broke metadata compatibility with a recent update. The podcast producer I know with an explicit AAC feed decided to just redirect to the MP3 feed. Unrelated to that, they also increased the MP3 bitrate for better audio quality. The increased file size doesn’t really matter that much compared to 15 years ago and people without unlimited data can just set their automated syncs to WiFi only.

  • lipilee@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    Apart from my home hifi (which is built around flac) everything i liaten to ia mp3. Podcasts - mp3. Car audio system? Max 192kbps mp3. My phone? Full of mp3. And I’m sure I’m not alone. To say mp3 is not relevant anymore is just misguided.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    Opus is better than MP3 in every way. File size is either better or the same, and audio is better even at lower bitrates. But realistically, most streaming services don’t provide HD audio, so it really doesn’t even matter.

    249 webm  audio only      21.58MiB  49k https │ audio only         opus        49k 48k low, webm_dash
    250 webm  audio only      22.09MiB  65k https │ audio only         opus        65k 48k low, webm_dash
    251 webm  audio only      24.14MiB 128k https │ audio only         opus       128k 48k medium, webm_dash
    233 mp4   audio only        │                 m3u8  │ audio only         unknown             Default
    234 mp4   audio only        │                 m3u8  │ audio only         unknown             Default
    140 m4a   audio only      24.20MiB 130k https │ audio only         mp4a.40.2  130k 44k medium, m4a_dash
    

    This is YouTube music, which generally serves the split audio from a YouTube video as a song. Most of them I checked either don’t have audio above 130Kbps or don’t even provide MP3/Opus anyways.

    • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Youtube Music doesn’t just serve the audio from a video. They do serve the audio from a video if nothing else is available, but they also get releases directly from the publishers/distributors.

      The difference in sound quality is definetly noticeable.

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Youtube Music doesn’t just serve the audio from a video.

        Yes it does. You don’t even need to take my word for it. Look up any song by any artist and find their official video for that song. Take this one as an example: https://youtu.be/kPa7bsKwL-c

        Analyze it with yt-dlp or something similar;

        249 webm  audio only      21.51MiB    50k https │ audio only           opus        50k 48k low, webm_dash
        250 webm  audio only      22.00MiB    67k https │ audio only           opus        67k 48k low, webm_dash
        251 webm  audio only      23.92MiB   130k https │ audio only           opus       130k 48k medium, webm_dash
        233 mp4   audio only        │                   m3u8  │ audio only           unknown             Default
        234 mp4   audio only        │                   m3u8  │ audio only           unknown             Default
        140 m4a   audio only      23.90MiB   129k https │ audio only           mp4a.40.2  129k 44k medium, m4a_dash
        

        YouTube already has access to the audio for that song without any additional effort because of how YouTube works. I’m sure publishers can provide higher quality audio, up to 256Kbps but that option isn’t even enabled for users by default. By default you’re listening to “normal” audio or 130Kbps: https://i.xno.dev/Ow2eC.png

        The reason why YouTube Music works is because they already have access to a huge library of music through music videos and the like. They save a ton of time and money by doing things this way and it makes perfect sense that they do…

        • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          As I said, some of the music is just the audio of a video, but they also get a lot of releases directly from the publishers. They are both on YT Music and the difference in quality in between them is noticeable.

          I have my audio quality set to high in that options menu btw.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s less supported, and for me mp3 is largely enough. Can fit a lot of them on my 20€ 128GB usb key…

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, I’m sure that it is less supported, but in all the years I’ve been using it I haven’t found one. 🤷‍♂️

  • scripthook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    I got back into using soulseek and have mp3s on my phone and on my pc. I find it rewarding for privacy and offline reliability purposes. Not to mention it’s free.

  • muhyb@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well, most of my music collection lies as mp3. I care about metadata and all of them have tags. I would love to convert my collection to opus but first I need FLACs and an easy way to move over metadata, since vorbis is different than ID3tag. Do you know a streamlined way for this?

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        For Flac you have digital market places and CDs you can obtain from store fronts and private sellers like flea markets or shops like ebay or discogs.

        Or torrents and DDL.

        • muhyb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I actually used discogs a lot in the past. They can be quite expensive at times. Though this will be a mix of everything since not everything can be obtainable legally, at least for my archive.

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            If I juat want one song and flac isnt expensive to buy digitally I’ll buy it.
            But if they want somethibg like 3€ per song I’d bail and pirate it.
            Discogs is only if I really want it the CD and it’s out of sale. Else it’s usually less expensive to buy it from the official store.

            But if I had to choose between discogs and ebay, I’d prefer discogs due to more information about the release and condition.

  • Eyedust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    I 100% do. I think mp3 is a good compromise of sound and space. It’s also the format I’m used to. Just like how people swear by physical record. If I’m at a get together and hear mp3 quality, I’m at home.

    That being said, I have my absolute favorites in flac for my iPod 5th gen video I rebuilt. The 5th gen’s dac, Wolfson, is a solid little dac for the day and age. Got Rockbox loaded up and I’m ace, but I’ve hard saved all the Apple firmware for every model in case the time came to sell them. Old iPods could be an investment someday and I own every gen in multiples.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sure, it’s like JPG.

    It may not be the newest or best compression ratio, but it works, and even the shittiest old hardware supports it. And I know it won’t whine about licences being missing or some shit.

  • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I remember reading articles at the time of the last patents running out. Some were so misguided it was hilarious.

    They called it the death of MP3! As if patents were good or necessary, instead of restrictive and troublesome for interoperability.

  • Rose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have boatloads of MP3s and at least they can pretty much be played by all imaginable software and hardware imaginable, and since the patents have expired, there’s no reason not to support the format.

    MP3s are good enough for its particular use case. Of course, newer formats are better overall and may be better suited for some applications. (Me, I’ve been an Ogg Vorbis fan for ages now. Haven’t ripped a CD in a while but should probably check out this newfangled Opus thing when I do.)