• Graphine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, with Apple making it incredibly fucking hard to take out their batteries with excessive amounts of glue, I’m okay with this.

      • Graphine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They do, but they’re incredibly prone to breaking when you pull and sometimes they’re just hard as shit to grip so you have to use a screwdriver to twist and pull.

        I don’t think I need to explain why that’s so dangerous.

        • JCreazy@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          As someone who has changed hundreds of iphone batteries, the adhesive sucks. At least they changed to a different adhesive around iphone 8 because alcohol does wonders on it. I don’t even attempt to pull the tabs on those anymore.

          • Graphine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            May I ask how you do that? Do you just…douse the battery in alcohol? There isn’t much of a gap between the adhesive and the battery in my experience, so it just sits inside the chasis and rolls around. I haven’t had any luck with that but I’m probably doing it wrong.

            • JCreazy@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I drizzle some in the corner and then use a sturdy tool to gently pry up on the battery to allow the alcohol to get deeper under. Since the adhesive patches are small to fit around the wireless charging coil, it doesn’t take much. Once you get one side of the battery loose the other will easily come with it, especially if the alcohol got to them.

  • quortez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fingers crossed that this will be implemented well, im tired of having sleek electronics be irrelevant in 2 years when the silicon could go for 5 or six

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The silicon could go on for decades if both the modem and processor were fully documented hardware that the community can access and support in the Linux kernel.

      I can run a secure and current form of Linux on 30+ year old hardware if I want to, because the hardware documentation was expected by everyone at the time even if some end users were oblivious to what this meant. The whole reason google pushes Android is because they provide a base Linux kernel that hardware manufacturers can easily slip their proprietary junk into without requiring them to add the kind of open source code needed for mainline kernel support by the community. This is the mechanism that depreciates your device. It is totally artificial and an end user exploitation by design.

      • Margot Robbie@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s usually not silicon on the PCB that fails, but the other electronic components (usually the capacitors) that fails first, and since they are surface mounted devices it’s really difficult to solder them by hand.

        • j4k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There are no electrolytics in phones, and most newer phones don’t even have tantalums. So long as there are no flexing stresses induced, which is nearly impossible with the way phones are constructed now, the all MLC capacitors construction has the potential to outlast any PC motherboard or laptop by a large margin.

          The most critical issue is board connectors and moisture ingress. The USB-C connector or any other high pin density micro sized connector with a tiny pin pitch, and large electrical potential will fail from charge cycling and a resistance forming between pins. USB-C is particularly bad because reversing the connector doubles the number of pins on the board in a ridiculous amount of space. Just using a standard USB-C connector when ordering a prototype to be fabed at any common board house will double the price. The USB-C pin pitch is too tight for the most common fab process resolution.

          • Margot Robbie@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The pin pitch only matters for high power application to prevent arcing, and that can also be resolved through the most modern USB-PD standard (See: USB-PD Extended Power Range, which can support up to 240w), and the electrical adjustment you have to make are all on the device side.

            I don’t know about the resistance forming between the pins, for low cycle applications the cheapest gold flash plating would easily last 10K plug cycles, and accounting for corrosion from hand sweat/oil/hand lotion, many companies favor going for thicker hard gold or platinum plating nowadays. (Rhodium is the absolute best, but it’s just too expensive now to do at scale because they are used in catalytic converters for electric cars). USB-C lasts for many more cycles than the Micro-USB standards before it (You can read the 4 axis and wrenching test standards for mechanical testing on the USB spec) so I’m not sure what you are talking about here.

            • j4k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lab tests rarely reflect the real world. I’ve seen several issues with Pixels that had an issue with PD failing due to moisture, corrosion, and a bridge developing at the connector.

              • Margot Robbie@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Actually, no, the lab tests are standard with all products of all large companies, and they are usually conducted in extreme conditions, like 100% moisture at 80-90C oven for 48 hours and highly concentrated salt spray kind of extreme.

                You bring up the example of Google Pixel, yeah, because it’s Google, they are software people who think they can just cheap out on hardware and save a couple of cents by making it up in software. Look at the Nexus 5X and 6P, both devices had an absurd amount of quality control issues compared to the other products made by the manufacturers, and the only factor in common between them is Google.

                • j4k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Things change with time. The Pixel is now the most secure phone available due to its hardware encryption key verification system. It is the only phone that can run a verifiably secure bootloader and ROM on top of the same untrusted hardware situation found in all modern proprietary devices. Running a Pixel on Graphene OS is the most free and honestly liberating experience that has been available since the invention of capacitive touch technology made these handheld computers popular. The hardware build is on par with any similar device of the same price point, made in the same facilities as most devices.

    • golli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Add to that requirements for longer software support. At least for security patches.

  • Wander@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hooray! Younger generations will finally be able to experience the joy of dropping their phone and having to pick up three to four different pieces! /s

    (I’m all for this change, by the way)

      • Wander@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was 12, I think, when I got my first phone. A Nokia. I was mortified the first time it happened. Then clack-clack-clack I was taught to put it together again.

        Happened many more times afterwards.

        • _MoveSwiftly@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was around the same age. :) I still have the old Nokias. What a time that was, with Symbian being an OS.

    • dolkeylime@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was under the impression this is just stopping companies gluing batteries so the phones are repairable.
      Are we going back to nokia style batteries?

  • NightOwl@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Phones are getting more expensive so people are holding on to them longer, so it’s a nice quality of life improvement to remove the barriers to battery replacement so less people have to go down to a phone repair store to get it changed. The more of a hassle battery replacement is seen the more likely people are to just upgrade and create e-waste.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem here is that in order for most people to be able to replace the battery themselves safely they need to be really idiot proof. We’d need to return to back covers with latches or big screws and batteries in cases and contacts. This shit is bulky, heavy and hardly waterproof.

      New iPhones use lipo pouch with a ZIF connector straight to the motherboard with a “pull to release” adhesive strip hidden under a panel with a single use sticky seal and two small screws. There is no black magic in replacing the battery yourself and the solution is small, lightweight and waterproof. However most people wouldn’t even know which way to turn the screws to loosen them and probably wouldn’t be bothered by throwing the phone away and getting the one with a better camera AI and more emojis.

      • Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, the og motorola defy had removable battery, ip67 rating, expandable storage, and a headphone jack. It was a tiny phone and it was brilliant.

        • PhantomAudio@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          my first smartphone was an lg optimus s. that thing saw more toilet time than my butt. i lost track of how many times i dropped it in the toilet. it went in a lake a few times, also. it was a beast

      • Nathaniel Wyvern@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        @riodoro1 @NightOwl I dunno, if you compare capacities of say, iPhone 14 Pro (12.38Wh) to Fairphone 4 (15.03Wh) and then the product dimensions of the two. There’s not a huge amount in it. Adding the 14 Pro Max (16.68Wh) for additional comparisons.

        The Fairphone is 2.6mm thicker than the iPhones. (Yes the screen bezels are chonk too lol) But the fairphone is also making allowance to make every single component swappable, and has an IPS display (switching to OLED would save 1+ millimeter)

        • Nathaniel Wyvern@mastodon.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          @riodoro1 @NightOwl

          The hard part with iPhones isn’t the battery side of the equation here, it’s Magsafe (which is great imo) While regular QI charging is fairly lowkey, I could see the extra tech required inside the phone for that being prohibitive in terms of spatial management.

      • Nogami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        [edit: deleted, echo chamber here. Android good, Apple bad. Moving on and blocking this community, can’t have a reasonable conversation, just like reddit I guess].

        • jorge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          The difference is that most of the people isn’t expected to own a mechanical watch, but having a smartphone is pretty much expected. You cannot treat a basic commodity as if it were a luxury item.

        • awh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          How is this an Android vs Apple thing? Most of the major manufacturers are making devices with the battery sealed in; they’ll all have to innovate ways of making them removable.

      • NightOwl@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I wish there was some advancements made when it came to trying to create swappable battery devices that retain water proofing. That area has just stalled since expensive disposable tech is more lucrative. Average person should just get a new one like you said as long as the process is still more difficult than changing a light bulb.

        • awh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I wish there was some advancements made when it came to trying to create swappable battery devices that retain water proofing.

          If nothing else, regulations like the one described in here will do just that. So far the tech giants haven’t had any incentive to design sleek, waterproof devices with replaceable batteries. But you’ve gotta believe that if they’re required to have replaceable batteries, they’re not going to say “OK, back to chonky non-waterproof devices for us!”. They’re going to spend some of their R&D budgets to innovate ways that makes it more realistic to do all three.

        • Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The original Moto Defy got it right the first time with ip67 rated, removable battery, expandable storage, and a headphone jack. The next major improvement came with the xperia z(or z3) and they got waterproof charge ports and headphone jacks (no port plug required) but ditched the removable battery. Every other phone since seems to have stripped away some useful feature since. The new defy 2 is going to have satelite messaging but is huge and no removabpe battery or headphone jack iirc.

  • guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    Excellent! Batteries in modern phones are surprisingly definitely removable and replaceable. I’ve done it multiple times. However, the unfriendly barrier to entry is glue and clips that require careful prying with spugers. It’s quite clear manufacturers are happy blocking you getting in; plenty people just buy new phones when the battery gets too old.

  • got2best@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do y’all remember the days when you dropped your phone and it exploded into 3 or 4 pieces? 🤣 Those were the good days.

  • konalt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually love all these regulations on smartphones (mainly by the EU), like the recent USB-C standard. That one in particular makes it so much easier to share chargers around the house!

    • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a USA citizen, thanks EU for making our cellphone companies not be dick’s.

    • designated_fridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      USB-type C to become EU’s common charger by end of 2024

      I mean… Sure, but we’ve had USB-C as de facto standard for many years now. When was the last time you saw a micro USB phone?

  • TheSaneWriter@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this goes through, I think it would be really good news. Battery failure is one of the leading things that force people to replace their smartphones, and having them be replaceable would go a long way towards making smartphones last longer.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the manufacturer wants to force you to upgrade they still can… they can stop making the battery that works with your phone model (and notch them to make sure they can’t fit).

      Back in the day there were some manufacturers that made batteries that worked with several of their models, Nokia was one of them, but not all of them did.

      Even Nokia had a deprecation cycle for battery models and when that happened you were stuck buying crappy Chinese copies.

    • Bill Stickers@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But they are replaceable in that sense. You can take it back the the manufacturer or to one of those independent phone stores and they’ll swap out a battery for you.

      I don’t think a user swappable battery is actually a feature most users need. Not when smartphones get over a day out of a charge, you can charge at home, work or in a car, and external batteries exist.

      • Faendol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What phone are you using? Both apple and Samsung have made their devices borderline impossible to swap the battery out. They will then charge you an arm and a leg for sometime that used to be an easy swap.

    • TurretCorruption@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      God i hope so. I miss being able to just pop the back off and change out my battery. It was great for sd and sim card slots too. I am quite excited for this

      • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t get too excited. I purchased a galaxy xcover 6 pro at launch. It is a recent device with a removeable plastic back cover with a gasket on it to preserve the IP68 rating, much in the same style as was popular up to the galaxy S5.

        It seems like they forgot how to make that design work, because the first time I got caught in the rain it died an immediate and very hot death.

        There are many other ways to carry out this design but they make the device a bit thicker which manufacturers are going to absolutely hate.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’d be awesome. I don’t understand why people think a glass back is premium. Your premium glass back doesn’t look so fancy when it’s shattered into a million pieces or sandwiched behind a $10 phone case from China.

      I’ve hung on to my Note 4 that I bought in 2014 (no longer use it daily) and it’s still in one piece even though it never lived in a case. The plastic and aluminum body have plenty of battle scars but no cracks or functional damage. This MFer is almost 10 years old now on its 5th or 6th battery and still hanging in there despite its aged hardware. Now that is a premium design.

      • Otakeb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hope everything just becomes brushed aluminum ffs. I hate all these glass back phones

        • wheels@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Phones only have glass backs to let wireless charging work so I don’t see aluminium making a come back any time soon.

          • Otakeb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I hate wireless charging too, though. It’s inherently less efficient than wired, and you have less range of motion while charging. With a wire, I can still use my phone while it’s plugged in. Wireless charging needs to go away imo.

            • Mike@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m pretty glad to have both options. I take your point about using it while charging, but I also find myself having to jump up from my desk quite a bit, and it’s nice to be able to just pick up my phone without first unplugging it. And I imagine all of that plugging and unplugging is reducing the durability of the port over time.

              • Otakeb@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I really like the magnetic charging port plug adaptors for situations like that, but personally, if I’m jumping up and down from my desk at work or something and have my phone plugged in, I’ll just leave it on my desk while I’m away. And if I’m not coming back to it for a good bit, the extra half second it takes to unplug my phone is more than worth the more efficient power transfer, imo.

                But to each their own.

            • electriccars@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Couldn’t disagree more. Wireless charging with magnetic attachment like magsafe is a godsend for using my phone as a GPS. Just slap it onto it’s magnetic wireless charger and go. Pull it off when done. A million times better than the old chargers that grip the phone and then also having to plug it in every time I need to drive somewhere, then undo it all when I get there.

            • LUHG@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I interested in how your hate for wireless charging has anything to do with this thread?

              We’ve had wireless charging in every single material back and it’s absolutely wonderful QOL improvement.

              • Otakeb@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Even disregarding material, it is literally less efficient due to transmission losses, and it’s only “wireless” in so far as you have a wireless dock to drop your phone on that is then attached to the wall just like a regular cable. The only thing it does is make it so you don’t have to plug a cable in or use a magnetic cable attachment, but there isn’t really any convenience gain over just having a charging cord especially if you have a super long charging cable for your stationary spots in the house.

          • JCreazy@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wireless charging isn’t all that needed IMO. It’s kind of old technology, my phone had it 10 years ago but none of my phones have had it since and I haven’t really missed it because USB C charging is fast enough where wireless charging isn’t really necessary.

            • cm0002@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s also a gimmick afaic, it’s not “Wireless” to me until it can charge contactless from a distance. This not-really-wireless wireless crap just moved the connection and made it magnetic instead of a plug. It’s a glorified magsafe lmao

              • Sancthuary@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hell yeah, dont understand why people are big about this while it just contact charging. It doesnt even charge phone fast nor efficient. Funny people keep bragging about waste while they use inefficient charging method which waste more energy.

                • boonhet@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s inefficient, but it doesn’t depend on a finnicky-ass charging port so that’s nice.

                  When Apple goes USB-C on iPhones, I will unfortunately have to start using wireless charging, because USB-C ports are so annoying to clean compared to Lightning, I don’t plan on having a functional one after a year of owning a USB-C phone.

            • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’d never want to get rid of wired charging, but wireless is a really nice option. I’m never able to find a good angle/spot for my phone in my car with a wire sticking out of it. Even with a dashboard mount, I would prefer the mount itself be powered to avoid having the cable just hanging with the pull of gravity on it.

          • cm0002@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Phone manufacturers: “Man this glass stuff likes to shatter a lot no matter what we try to make it stronger. I know, let’s wrap the whole phone in it that’ll solve everything!!! 111”

          • Omega@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We had phones with glass backs before wireless charging was widespread (see sony xperia z phones from 8+ years ago for example)

  • arseneau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is awesome. Thank god for EU legislation that directly benefits me as an American consumer. Now I can microwave lithium ion batteries in peace!

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s hope to standardized USB-C connector charging will also happen outside of Europe for the rest of the world.

    • entropicshart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      For companies like Apple, it would be cost more to keep two types of ports for different regions rather than upgrade the new devices all together. Been holding out with my broken iPhone 12 waiting for that sweet USB-C

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it doesn’t. you have have IP68 and a removable battery. What’s not as easy it making them paper-thin as the battery needs to have structural integrity of its own.

    • Whooping_Seal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      My old Galaxy S5 was water resistant (IP67, 30min/1 metre submerged)

      The rear cover had a gasket to prevent water entering the motherboard, micro sd, battery, sim etc.

      • variouslegumes@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used a hammy down s5 for a few years. Just had to replace the battery and it was good to go. It eventually degraded and became really really slow. Good phone.

    • JCreazy@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve never understood the whole waterproof thing. I’ve never been in an instance where my phone was in any danger of getting wet. I get float trips and stuff but that seems like an uncommon case and even then there are ways to waterproof a phone temporarily.

      • derf82@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t use your phone on the bathroom or the kitchen? It never rains where you live? You never keep your phone in your pocket next to a sweaty leg?

        I want a phone that can survive minor issues. I don’t want a phone that will die because it slipped into the sink while washing my hands or something like that. A degree of being waterproof does that.

      • minimar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        This. If you really want to take your phone on your extreme surfing adventure, just put it in a waterproof case!

      • Whooping_Seal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think a phone needs to be 100% waterproof to 50 metres, but some amount of water-resistance is just good product design. Companies should not be encouraging people to dunk their phones in water, I think IP ratings sadly encourage this as well as some of the advertising around their water resistance claims.

        But having some amount of water resistance built into electronics helps reduce e-waste because accidents do happen. For more serious water activities people should be buying waterproof bags for their electronics.

    • markstos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Motorola Defy was waterproof with removable battery. A small switch locked the cover in place with a rubber gasket. This was over 10 years ago.