Worst then that, it is an excuse to continue or increase emissions and distract people from real solutions. We need to reduce emissions first. It might be valuable someday once the low hanging fruit has been dealt with.

Its a waste of valuable resources that could be used on known, more efficient ways of reducing emissions. Carbon capture isn’t here to save us, it is here to save oil and gas

It’s not a single bullet solution. There is no single bullet solution.
It is one bullet, in a hail of bullets fired at the problem. They’ll all be needed.

Use coal to pull carbon from the air. Makes total sense! /s

It will be necessary once we’ve done all the much more effective and cheaper stuff. For now, it’s important to make it better for when we need to focus on it. That said, anything more than academic at this point is probably designed to allow emitters to keep emitting longer.

tl;dr waste of money

It’s a big fuckin’ mystery.

I would say its a yes and. Yes it costs a lot of money and it’s not as efficient as trees long term. But Trees + these machines + no longer burning and releasing CO2 at the current rate + land rewilding = a chance at survival.