The Justice Department’s proposal to force Google to rein in and even sell off its Chrome browser business may seem like a win for competitors such as Mozilla’s Firefox browser. But the company says the plan risks hurting smaller browsers.

In their recommendations, federal prosecutors urged the court to ban Google from offering “something of value” to third-party companies to make Google the default search engine over their software or devices.

The problem is that Mozilla earns most of its revenue from royalty deals—nearly 86% in 2022—making Google the default Firefox browser search engine.

"If implemented, the prohibition on search agreements with all browsers regardless of size and business model will negatively impact independent browsers like Firefox and have knock-on effects for an open and accessible internet,” Mozilla says. “As written, the remedies will harm independent browsers without material benefit to search competition.”

  • Potatofish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 小时前

    The comments are a who’s who of anarchists. Watch them burn it all down and end up with Microsoft owning the dominant browser again. Idiots…

  • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    ·
    1 天前

    May I be frank? I suspect that, in the long run, Mozilla not getting this money will actually benefit Firefox. Sure, so exec will get pissed as they won’t get 5.6 million dollars a year, and Firefox won’t get some weird nobody-asked-for feature that’ll be ditched some time later; but I think that they’ll focus better on the browser this way. Specially because whoever is paying the dinner is the one picking the dish, and with a higher proportion of their effective income coming from donations, what users want will stop being so neglected.

    Just my two cents.

    • Andy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 天前

      I totally agree.

      Frankly, Mozilla should be embarrassed to have released this statement.

      It’s basically ‘Please don’t harm our competitor for corruptly bribing rivals! We like those bribes very much!’

    • Lung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 天前

      Yeah but in the short term the company will literally go out of business

        • Lung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          21 小时前

          Y’know, you’re right & that’s wild. I guess I should have known, but didn’t assume that they have like 600m in unrelated investments. Though the burn rate is quite a lot too, so they probably would scale back browser dev a lot if it lost its profitability & become a pure VC kinda org

        • tb_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          23 小时前

          The way Mozilla can advocate for web standards will be sorely missed.

          • Pika@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 小时前

            To my knowledge they don’t though, Chrome has had the overall market share for years. Most of the time them is a little project is tailing behind Chrome, because anything that they add to Chrome if the other browsers didn’t follow suit they were left in the dust. I haven’t seen the Mozilla project as a Trailblazer in years

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 天前

        Perhaps.

        Worst hypothesis the company gets completely bankrupt, but someone takes up the torch.

        • Lung@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 天前

          The thing is it’s never been more expensive and time consuming to write a browser, it’s bigger scope than a kernel in many ways. Stuff like Epiphany isn’t even close, despite relying on Apple’s webkit. Most distros just push people to Firefox now, despite a history of KHTML and all that. We would need something like the Linux Foundation to pick it up (which runs on corporate sponsorship for a shared resource)

          • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            23 小时前

            If Google is the only thing holding up the non-Apple web browsers, maybe then this will lead to scaling down the insane scope of the web standards so it becomes reasonable to implement and maintain a browser for non-megacorps.

            Wishful thinking, but hey.

    • ryper@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 天前

      Firefox won’t get some weird nobody-asked-for feature that’ll be ditched some time later

      Nah, the features nobody asked for will just be limited to ones that will provide a revenue stream.

      • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 天前

        However once they lose the googlebux, a meaningful part of the revenue stream will be donations. And features implemented because of donators asking for them are, typically, things that we users desire.

        • pelya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 小时前

          Donations are not sustainable. Many open-source projects tried them, and the only thing they can cover are server costs or conferences, developers are still working for free on their own time.

  • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 天前

    “Listen, making the entire market dependent on one corporate benefactor just sothey aren’t a 100% monopoly and only a 99% one is important”

    Jesus Christ Mozilla, do you hear yourself?

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 小时前

      Remember, Mozilla spends more on executives and their “outreach” programs than they spend on Firefox developers.

    • prof_wafflez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 天前

      Mozilla needs to ditch their CEO and maybe even their board. They’ve lost their way all because the leadership is greedy

  • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 天前

    I understand why Mozilla would want to keep the money coming from Google, but it might also be good for them to be less dependent from Google.

    Nothing is preventing them from cutting deals with other search engines if they want to keep doing that.

    • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      edit-2
      1 天前

      I feel like Mozilla is a big money laundering scheme at this point. It only exist so chrome isn’t a monopoly, and I pretty sure the CEO and several other workers are getting paid an obscene amount to do nothing all day while only 20% of the money actually goes toward working on the browser.

        • Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 天前

          It’s half exaggerated and half true.

          Last year, there was some breakdown of Mozilla earnings circulating on the web and I vaguely remember them gaining like 600 or 800 millions (mostly from Google) while only spending something around 200 millions for software dev, and this was in 2022 (their revenue from Google increases each year for some reason). That’s 33% to 25%, so it’s either 66% or 75% of Mozilla revenue used for god knows what.

          • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 天前

            Thank you for that breakdown. I’m a big fan of Firefox, but have been aware of there being issues with Mozilla for some time now (albeit from the periphery). I figured when these cases came against Google, that even though I generally supported the breakup of the monopoly, I knew that a story like this one would eventually land.

            If Mozilla is indeed burning money instead of putting the majority of it towards Firefox and, to a lesser extent, Thunderbird, then yeah, they’re going to need to reassess their budget and where to allocate their assets as without big moneybags Google forking over the funds, it’d be within their best interests to really invest hard into making their browser better.

            Thanks again.

    • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 天前

      I’m guessing that once Google is prohibited from providing incentives, the bottom will fall out of that particular market and those other search engines will likely pay less, if anything, for the privilege.

      • Billygoat@catata.fish
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 天前

        Would other search engines be able to “pay to be default”? My understanding is if this went through then browsers wouldn’t be able to take money from any search engine to be the default.

        • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 天前

          As I understand google is only prohibited from doing so because they are a monopoly and this would be abuse of their position, so smaller engines should be unaffected. For example, if I recall correctly, bing pays Vivaldi to be the default.

          • Billygoat@catata.fish
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 天前

            Thanks! So then the judgement is two fold. First to split chrome from google. Second to restrict google from paying to be the default search engine on any browser.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 天前

    It’s certainly better than the status quo. Sure, Mozilla will hurt at first because they’ve put their revenue source in the same basket, but it’s an opportunity to grow back.