Nothing helps stop Trump bleeding support from the senior woman demographic quite like a young whippersnapper punching a 70-year-old woman to the ground for her support of Harris.

  • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    269
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    Big tough guy sucker punched an old lady. Trump would be proud if it were possible for him to give a shit about anyone but himself.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      317
      ·
      16 days ago

      Not only that:

      According to witnesses, Bossio said, the 17-year-old was walking away from a separate altercation with a male Harris supporter when he struck Tomasko and knocked her to the ground.

      He did it because he was pissed at a male supporter but was too big of a wuss to throw hands with someone who could plausibly fight back, so to solve that, he sucker-punched an old lady. They’re not just abusive garbage, they’re pathetic cowards.

      • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        16 days ago

        Honestly, I hope he gets to vote in the future. Everyone should serve their punishment and get the chance to learn from it.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          16 days ago

          Emotionally I dislike your reply. Logically it’s correct. What good is “paying your debt to society” but never being forgiven when you live a better life after punishment.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 days ago

          You should just never lose it. Voting isn’t a privilege to be awarded for good behavior, never mind that laws are sometimes themselves unjust and often disproportionately applied. Should people in prison for weed possession be unable to express their opinion about whether weed should be illegal?

          Voting is both important and generally not that critical. The idea matters a lot more than the actual impact most votes have. There’s just not much in the way of compelling benefit to denying prisoners their vote and plenty of risk of the law, either intentionally or unintentionally, being an implement that can affect who gets to vote on the people that make and enforce the law.

    • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      16 days ago

      Oh, 100%, society is underestimating the terrible influence Tate, Peterson, and similar grifters are having on men (especially younger men).

      • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        16 days ago

        Jordan Peterson is really bad because the carnivore diet he promotes would starve the chud’s brain of nutrients.

        • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          63
          ·
          16 days ago

          Peterson is bad because he appeals to lonely blue collar millennial men who, if they had positive male role models or better friends, would have a real chance of being actual decent people.

          Tate is bad because he appeals to young men and boys who lack the life experience to know the guy is a loser and a grifter.

          My opinion anyway.

          • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            46
            ·
            16 days ago

            The harm I notice Peterson doing is setting back men’s mental health movements. A big barrier I run into working in mental health is not having enough male role models either locally in my area or public personalities online who are willing to discuss things like medication and therapy, but also to discuss the important lifestyle changes that have to be made, particularly in terms of healthy relationships. A big part of men’s mental health needs to be men supporting men instead of competing for women to then use as their sole emotional support. In addition to placing an unfair burden on women, it’s just frankly a burden that can’t and ultimately won’t be carried, leaving men with inadequate support when there’s a better solution to be had. Instead you have peterson (and others, but Peterson has a fancy psych degree to hide his bullshit behind) perpetuating these antiquated ideas that men should be competing with each other. Men deserve better.

              • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                16 days ago

                I run into troubled young men a lot, unfortunately. I was raised female so I often lack the context to truly empathize with their life experiences, and I’m really hurting for coworkers to consult who can.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 days ago

              You know what there’s no one really doing, or not anyone that young men are following?

              Someone telling them they’ll have more prospects if they just make female friends. Not friends that they expect to one day fuck, just friends that are women. So they know how to talk to women and treat them like human beings.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Democrats: We can ignore the concerns of young people because they don’t vote.

        Also Democrats: Why are young people falling for Republicans’ shit?

    • KrankyKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      This guy should definitely face punishment, but maybe we shouldn’t dilute the term “domestic terrorism” with something like this…

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            15 days ago

            Assault and battery are tools used by terrorists in terroristic ways, though. It can be both.

            This isn’t on the same level of terrorism as a whole group doing the terror, but it’s still terrorism by definition, because it is politically motivated. This kid assaulted this old lady in order to terrorize her from exercising her political rights.

      • The Stainless Aluminum Rat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 days ago

        We absolutely should apply the DHS definition to crimes that match that definition. We should also prosecute those who put people’s lives in danger in violent attacks motivated by a desire to suppress free and open elections to the fullest extent of the law.

        Otherwise the terrorists win.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        on one hand, you’re absolutely right. this was an attack between individuals.

        on the other hand, it is their definition. frankly, they won’t hesitate to call us domestic terrorists for protesting against the reduction or complete removal of our civil liberties.

        i say let the judge, judge. criminal intent is important in cases like these.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    16 days ago

    When I think of conservatives, I always think of youths sucker punching old Asian women in the back of the head because of Covid. This is typical.

    • nieminen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      Did you mean “demoNcrats”? That’s the term the kids are using these days. I swear, the nicknames are the only things remotely clever about trump supporters.