• empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    Gunpowder is self oxidizing when ignited. As long as they used a non-evaporating lubricant on the actual mechanical components like graphite, and included a barrel liquid cooling loop, the M2 would operate totally fine in space.

    • itslilith
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 days ago

      Now I want to see a space-ready heavy machine gun with a big radiator attached

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      A closed loop wouldn’t work probably. You’d need an open loop, or a shit ton of radiators. I guess potentially it could couple to the ground and sink heat into it, but you’d need to be stationary.

  • FermiEstimate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    14 days ago

    See also Brigador: apart from the various lasers, exotic ballistics, and nightmarish chemical weapons it includes, there’s also the prosaic “Mãe Dois.” The tech entry leaves no doubt about what it is:

    My understanding is that this weapon not only predates the colonies, but space travel entirely. If that is the case then it’s a truly venerable design, and one I’m told will continue to serve for the foreseeable future.

  • nuke@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    14 days ago

    The year is 2734. Humanity has conquered death, cured every disease (even the common cold), and colonized the stars. Yet on battlefields from Earth to Europa, the M2 Browning still thunders, the BUFF rumbles through alien skies, the M1 Abrams fires its 120mm cannon, and every Marine is issued a KA-BAR.

  • sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    So… I don’t see that anyone’s brought this up yet so here goes:

    If we are talking space space, you know, in orbit, transiting between planets…

    You have to account for the recoil of each shot potentially sending your craft into a rotational spin, which can alter its trajectory.

    Depending on the mass of your firing platform, you may have to expend a considerable amount of monoprop fuel, or energy in batteries to run multi axis centrifugal stabilizers…so that you maintain your desired trajectory.

    Also, even if you are not in space, but on a moon or planet with significantly lower mass than earth… you’re gonna have to do extra work to keep your tripod from dislodging from the ground, even knocking you backward with a sustained burst.

    It might not even be practical to do a sustained burst or sweep, it might end up making sense to mod a slower cyclic rate into the thing, jerry rig a Kriss Vector counter weight style contraption to lower recoil.

    Basically, the weight of everything involved goes down as G goes down… but the recoil energy remains the same… if you are in 0.5 G, basically, the recoil is twice as intense, as its pushing against half as much weight.

    Each single shot would be more precise and travel farther in a vacuum or thin atmosphere and lower G… but sustained fire would be less accurate.

    …Or maybe I’m overstating this effect? I’m too tired and lazy to attempt the actual physics calculations for recoil force.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    The space shuttles were originally designed with 6 M2s mounted in the wings. It was mostly a tradition thing, but they cut the armament to save weight or something stupid. Fast forward to the Columbia disaster, and where does the fatal foam piece strike? Right in the firing line of old ma deuce.