The federal government is poised to release their next-generation transit investment program, the Canada Public Transit Fund. It may surprise you to learn that not a single penny of this $30-billion program is allowed to go toward stopping transit service cuts. Since 2016, it has been the federal government’s policy to limit the public transit funding it provides to building new subway or light rail infrastructure or buying new buses. It cannot be used to make existing transit more reliable by increasing service hours and the frequency of trains or buses. This is despite studies showing that these measures are the most important drivers of key outcomes like ridership growth and emissions reductions.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    25 days ago

    Nationalize public transit.

    That’s the fucking solution - it’s a public service not a business.

    • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Most if not all transit agencies in Canada are already belong to the public (as opposed to private businesses) already, no? TransLink mentioned in the article sure is, BC Transit too. BC Feries too… (kind of, crown is the sole shareholder).

      edit: lol what even does it mean to get downvotes for this

  • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    25 days ago

    Give it another year and our many layers of government will be banning busses because they “cause traffic” and stopping commuter trains because they interfere with shipping.

  • Victor Villas@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    It feels like I’m missing something, maybe because I’m not a politician or a transportation engineer. It’s very common that upper spheres of government will provide extra funding focused on capital expenditures like building new infrastructure but won’t commit to operational expenditures like maintenance and salaries.

    I wonder if it’s some sort of political game of being able to claim funding for shiny new things, because expansion is flashier than maintenance. Or maybe there’s a real governance aspect to it, considering that OPEX should stay under control at the right level as to not overstep the scope of each sphere of government - transit agencies should not grow accustomed to funding that is supposed to be extra. IDK, I guess I’m not ready to have an opinion on this. I’ll just trust whatever the folks at Movement say.

  • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Friendly reminder that nearly any canadian city of substantial population had electric trams decades ago. If we could build electrified transit then, we could certainly build it now.

  • Carl@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    City buses in Canada are switching to on demand for weekends. Which is unreliable. I prefer not using it, for how unreliable it is in my city.