• Matte@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can’t even get people to USE telegram, which they have already installed, let alone get them to understand, subscribe and install a federated messaging app. it seems like it’s whatsapp or back to the trained pigeons.

    • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but you can use the federated app and bridge whatsapp into it. It’s a good solution :)

      • ikiru@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        How does this work? And can you please expain it in terms an idiot, like myself, would understand?

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Basically the bridge listens for new posts on both services and copies them as needed. Think of it like a bot on Reddit or lemmy that automatically posts stuff on behalf of someone else.

          Does that make sense?

          • ikiru@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That makes sense, thank you!

            How do you install a bridge on Android? Using the bridge, could you theoretically link a WhatsApp account from a different phone?

              • ikiru@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah, okay. I think I understand now. So, I would have to host a server to do that then I assume?

                Thank you!

                • Derin@lemmy.beru.co
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you want to be in control of the server and bridges yourself, yes - you’d have to do that.

                  If not, you can just use a service like beeper

    • OskarAxolotl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nobody should use Telegram, in my opinion. It’s run by a shady company that doesn’t even disclose the inner workings of their service properly, uses a non-standard encryption protocol and doesn’t even encrypt chats by default. The only thing I like about Telegram is the fact that you don’t have to expose your phone number to use it.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One thing they really have going for them is timely delivery of image data.

        When I detect motion in my driveway I send them the JPEG through their API, without skipping a beat I get the image on all of my devices including my watch.

        I tried email, discord, SMS, slack, pushbullet. Stuff either takes a long time to come through or comes through missing an image. I honestly hope they never shut down the service because I cannot find another service that runs as well. Fortunately for my needs I don’t care and the least about encryption.

    • Falken@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I got a small team in school to all adopt my self hosted Matrix as a chat solution for a project we were working on throughout the year. It was great. Everyone jumped back to Discord after we graduated though.

  • kalipike@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah it’s definitely a chore to get anyone to use anything other than iMessage. A few friends and I use Signal even though they have iMessage and loved it. But everyone else is hooked to iMessage. Convenience is King in terms of adoption, unfortunately.

  • speck@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Anyone know if there are go-to servers to use? Looking to try Matrix for a team of around 20 where client information can be shared privately

    EDIT: mainly I was seeing if any of the public servers listed on joinmatrix.org/servers/ would be more recommended than others

    • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are we talking about a company?

      Element provides hosted and on-premise solutions for companies: https://element.io/

      Synapse is the server that’s normally used and can be installed pretty easily: https://matrix-org.github.io/synapse/latest/setup/installation.html

      There’s a list of public servers here: https://joinmatrix.org/servers/

      But be careful if it’s for a company, public servers might go down.

      As frontend you can also use the Element clients or web interface, they are completely free.

      • speck@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you. I think in my (ill-educated, poorly framed) original question, I think I was seeing if there were recommendations from the list on joinmatrix.org/servers/ I see that some are green-lit for privacy while others aren’t.

        This team isn’t enterprise level or anything and I’m just looking to elevate them from emails to, originally, Slack. They’re not sharing state secrets or anything, but are inconsistent about sharing client information that while not necessarily directly identifiable, should be kept under a tighter lid than it currently is.

      • SirShanova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No Windows server solutions? Synapse has Docker but I’ve had a hell of a time getting it up on my Win Server 2016 install.

        • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think Windows server is officially supported by Synapse so Docker, WSL or a Linux VM are probably your only chances.

    • Meseta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if the messages are end to end encrypted I wouldn’t trust a third party with that data (unless it was a company that does it for a living.)

      I’d probably recommend running your own instance, I imagine for that few users it would be pretty cheap. Though maintenance is probably the biggest issue there.

      Or just use a third party Matrix server but send client info over email using GPG keys. That would cost you nothing.