Every year, the arrival of the first NFL game in London brings with it some sort of strategic news leak aimed at goosing interest in American football.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 个月前

    16 international games per year is too many. 16 neutral-site games, with some International and some at those large college stadiums, would be awesome.

    Imagine Steelers-Eagles at Penn State, or Browns-Bengals at Ohio State.

  • BestTestInTheWest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 个月前

    I’ll buck the comment trend here and say as a non US fan, international games are great. I think the NFL should do as many as are feasible without taking away home games from home city fans and without adverse effects on players.

    I’m in Australia which is possibly going to get a game in 2025. Hopefully it will come to Melbourne but if it’s Sydney I’ll definitely fly up regardless of who is playing. It opens up the sport to international fans and grows the game.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 个月前

      No one cares about home games.

      It’s a dogshit excuse for football because it makes it impossible for teams to be physically or mentally prepared. It completely destroys the competitive balance of the sport. Single broken games are a huge deal in a short season.

      • frazorth@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 个月前

        Does this mean that American Football players are just worse athletes than players of other sports?

        Because I’ve never heard this terrible excuse used for international football, rugby, tennis.

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 个月前

          No, it means football is incredibly physically and mentally demanding and it’s literally impossible to recover and implement a gameplan in less than the week.

          There’s a reason there has never once in the history of the sport been high quality execution on a non-opener Thursday night game or a single international game. The entire schedule of a full week is necessary to play anything resembling NFL football, which is already heavily compromised by the obscene limitations on practice time.

          • frazorth@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 个月前

            Sounds like hype to me.

            Rugby is far more physically and mentally challenging.

            And it doesn’t require rubber padding because the players know how to take down other people.

              • frazorth@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 个月前

                No, its just a sport and when people try and talk them up as some sort of super athletes that are doing incredible things you don’t see in other sports I’ll knock that right down.

                • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 个月前

                  Sports are different.

                  If you ask someone to box at a world class level once a week for 4 months, the best case scenario is severe and permanent brain damage. The most likely outcome is that they literally die.

          • BestTestInTheWest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            30 天前

            There’s a reason there has never once in the history of the sport been high quality execution on a non-opener Thursday night game or a single international game.

            Bucs falcons right now is literally proving you wrong.