• squid_slime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    This would make a lot of sense if valve plan on releasing new iteration of their handheld.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This would make a lot of sense if valve plan on releasing new iteration of their handheld.

      It makes more sense that for the immediate future this is for ARM Chromebooks. Steam for Chromebooks currently only works with x86 CPUs. For the longer term, all kinds of options open up because of this, of course.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Full fledged SteamOS desktop release when?

      Maybe never. If I was at Valve, I would not want to open Pandora’s box of NVidia drivers.

    • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      What would an official steamOS desktop do that bazzite can’t? Unless you need commercial support because you are selling steam machines I don’t see how a official release would be of advantage.

      • HouseWolf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think there’s just people that trust Valve more than Linux in general.

        SteamOS on the deck is extremely foolproof, and people who are otherwise scared of Linux seem to think SteamOS magically fixes every perceived issue with desktop Linux.

        That’s my best guess but I’m just some dude.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Desktop mode is kind of funky, though. You need to open steam to type on the on-screen keyboard, lol. App store got patched and it’s better, but sometimes the apps get stuck downloading and I need to open up the command line to make them install

          • Cossty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            My brother plays games on Windows. I tried to convert him to Linux like two times, but he doesn’t want to do it. He doesn’t even play multiplayer games. Just single-player and co-op games. So Anticheat wouldn’t be a problem. When I said to him that Steam is releasing their own Linux distro, he said: Sure, I will try that.

            That was almost 3 years ago and there still isn’t official steamos for desktop.

            • RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              SteamOS at the end of the day just is an immutable distro with game mode for the steam deck. Bazzite does the same for PCs. I get that there is some level of brand recognition with Steam, but I think most people (including me) would take a while to notice there is something of when they are handed a steam deck with bazzite

          • Vash63@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes, and ChromeOS is built from Gentoo. That doesn’t mean much, the end user experience is worlds different.

          • Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes it is, so theoretically people can just install Arch with KDE and Steam and get a similar setup. However, there is something to be said about a supported OS versus Arch Linux’s community support which tends to have little patience for people who aren’t well informed about the workings of their OS.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        For the implications, I believe it would create a first class commercial level competition for Windows. It would open the door for a vendor trusted platform that implemented all the anti-cheat technologies. Paving the way to lift the virtual Linux ban on first day AAA games compatibility.

        • 佐藤カズマ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is what I was getting at. Sure, most games can be run with Proton fine and well, but if anti-cheat is code for “run Windows or else”, a lot of games are just unplayable, forcing gamers to at least dual boot with Windows.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    ANDROID??? can we play Triple AAA games on android that would be soo fire

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      ANDROID??? can we play Triple AAA games on android that would be soo fire

      You have it the wrong way around. It’s about Android games on SteamOS. Oculus/Quest runs a variant of Android, it just makes sense to have a Proton-style porting aid for Quest games on SteamOS.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 days ago

      no, it runs on x86 as its essentially a semicustom AMD chip. AMD currently does not have any consumer facing ARM chips

        • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          AMD is testing arm in the backend, but they have no incentive to switching to an ARM design at the moment. I fully believe both AMD and Nvidia are waiting for Qualcomm/Microsoft to iron out Windows for Arm before they release their projects. Nvidia of course has experience via tegra for linux via jetson. AMD is just making use of their advantageous situation on desktop/server market to not need to immediately shift to ARM.

          With Ryzen x3D for consumers(desktop), and Ryzen #c cores for low power server core count/low power consumption/yields. they control a huge mind share and the only one they dont control is low power boards (<35W) devices as it’s not their current priority (theyre devouring the server market)

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah, I’m just disappointed, because I’d love a low-power DIY NAS and I really don’t need need anything x86-specific on it. My main limitation with current ARM SOCs is limited RAM, I really want 16GB RAM, and many SOCs only go to 4GB.

            I know why they don’t do it, I was just hoping they’d make an option to use the same socket for ARM and x86 so I could pull a low-end server chip and put it into a higher-end consumer board and have my cake and eat it too.

            • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              if its strictly nas, yeah thats a flaw. the advantage of the x86 devices is that the low power chips have good transcoding. so its common for people to pick up intel n series boards for intel quicksync, and the raw expansion ports for storage