• threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    200
    ·
    1 year ago

    Microwaving delivers a triple whammy: heat, UV irradiation, and hydrolysis

    Microwave ovens do not generate ultraviolet light. They operate in the, well, microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum.

    I’m not saying microwaving plastic poses no risks, but this mistake makes me doubt the veracity of some of the more sensationalist claims in the article.

    • Sinnerman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wired articles are generally about interesting topics but take a sensationalist click-bait approach. I usually just skim the headline and look up the info somewhere more reputable if it sounds important.

      For example, here’s some info from the USDA:

      Plastic storage containers such as margarine tubs, take-out containers, whipped topping bowls, and other one-time use containers should not be used in microwave ovens. These containers can warp or melt, possibly causing harmful chemicals to migrate into the food.
      https://www.fsis.usda.gov/node/3355

      • treefrog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I pressure cook polypropylene all the time. I don’t eat out of it after but if pp5 can handle 3 hours at 17 psi I wouldn’t be concerned about popping it in the MW

      • KoofNoof@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So in theory so long as you don’t microwave too long you should be fine? I’ve never left a plastic container in long enough for it to warp or melt

        • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really, even if it gets hot but doesn’t warp it can still release harmful chemicals. I don’t think it’s as hard of a rule as not microwaving metal but it should definitely be minimized.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      It also says they microwaved the baby food in its plastic container for 3 minutes on High before checking to see the amount of microplastics in the results.

      Not sure about you guys, but I’ve had some experience with baby food in the last decade and can confirm that is FUCKING INSANE!

      Baby food is for… well, babies. And therefore is in baby portions. Like an ounce or two of easily digestible liquids, like liquified peas. Putting a couple ounces of liquid peas in the microwave for 3 minutes on High is not going to end well, no matter what type of container you’re using.

      • Shadywack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        “We need a sensationalist headline to rile people up” “Ok, I’ll get ChatGPT to whip up some bullshit about microwaving plastic and how it fucks up all the food!” “Awesome”

        “Hey boss, we got called out by people who have common sense” “Oh well, they’re not our target audience anyway, our targeted demographic will forget all about this when you post the next article, they have the memory of goldfish, fuck em”

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The linked study itself doesn’t make that claim either although I didn’t pay to see the detailed version.

  • xylogx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 year ago

    Totally makes sense not to microwave plastics, why take the risk?

    That said this article is alarmist. It states, “… The human health effects of plastic exposure are unclear…” then goes on to give a bunch scary quoyes to generate fear.

    • solstice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Respectfully disagree, I thought the tone was sufficiently concerning without being overly alarmist. I’ll stop microwaving plastics, which is a super easy lifestyle modification, until further research and evidence comes to light about this subject.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They aren’t denying plastics is a danger. They are pointing out the ethics violation in reporting which is a valid concern.

      • xylogx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess I am sensitive to over sensationalized media reporting. I want a neutral, even tone in my reporting. A title like “Microwaving plastics may have risks” would be welcome for me. Sensational headlines and an uneven perspective make me think either there is bias or a profit motive to scare you. Either way its bad reporting and I fell like I have to call it out.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I stopped microwaving plastics back when the BPA mimicking hormones thing was first coming to light, knowing that the alternatives the corps switched to would just fall under “no evidence of danger at this point (because it is new or hasn’t been specifically studied)” rather than “proven safe”.

        It wasn’t hard. I use glass dishes with plastic lids to store leftovers (so there’s an air gap between the plastic and the food, but now I am wondering if that’s enough or maybe I should get some bamboo lids for microwaving) and ceramic dishes for things I’m just making them.

        And I avoid microwavable dinners, as even the paper ones have a layer of plastic to prevent leaking (which I wonder how necessary it is if the food is frozen immediately and kept frozen until heated up).

        • solstice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe just transfer the contents of the microwave dinner into a glass bowl? Those microwave instructions can’t possibly be too crucial to the contents which are already going to be a bit sus to begin with. (That said, microwave food has come a LONG way in the last couple decades, real quietly too. I remember them being garbage when I was a kid but there’s some real good stuff out there now.)

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, though another reason I generally avoid them is because I once worked in a factory that produced some of those paper packages and they are only as clean as how much the workers that handled them cared about keeping them. Which varies but often isn’t that much.

    • Regna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Managed to misreply. Was intended to reply to your comment, but ended up as reply to post.

  • Timwi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hot take: you don’t need a microwave oven at all. I’ve been living without one for 12 years now and I don’t miss it. It’s surprisingly rare for the instructions on food packaging to require a microwave; they almost always have options for ovens or stoves, too.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t even need a heat source if all you eat is take out!

      Not having a small and convenient way to heat food is nothing to be smug about. Microwaves are convenient for heating some types of foods in a small and efficient way. Like leftovers.

      • LifeInOregon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get the convenience of microwave ovens, but they are, like a lot of things that are convenient, a sacrifice of quality. I’ve never found something that could be reheated in a microwave to taste better than something I reheated in a toaster oven or on the stove top, and both of those options are only marginally slower than a Microwave for significantly better results.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Melted cheese, refried beans, breadsticks, and a ton of other stuff is extremely easy to reheat in the microwave with lower power settings and a wet paper towel. Most people just blast microwaves on high, which is like turning the stove all the way up. A little bit of technique and a microwave will heat food more evenly than a stove top while leaving it in the ceramic or glass container it is stored in.

          It takes a little knowledge, just like a stove or oven. Most people just treat microwaves like magic and get terrible results.

          As a bonus, when staying in a hotel that has a microwave but no stove I get conveniently reheated food that still has good texture and taste!

    • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t have one either but they’re nice to quickly heat up leftovers or other quick snacks. I would not use them as a main cooking appliance though.

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hot take: some people are disabled and find a microwave easier and/or safer to use.
      Another hot take: many more people are poor, and using a microwave is not only significantly cheaper in terms of electricity use, it also takes much less time to cook in, time not being seen as a resource when it’s those who have little of it being discussed.

      Yours isn’t a hot take, it’s a privileged one. And there’s nothing wrong with that, or the fact that not using a microwave works for you, it’s the assumption that everyone else can do the same as you if only they’d thought about it sooner, that you should probably reconsider.

    • miles@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      i haven’t had a microwave since i moved out of my parent’s place. figured id eventually get one when i felt like i needed it, but that still hasn’t happened 5+yrs later

    • noqturn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only thing keeping me on the microwave is bagged popcorn. I have a problem

  • Thorry84@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure I’m like 30% microplastics at this point. I’ve been mealprepping for years, throw everything in “microwave safe” plastic containers. During the week I’m working all day, come home exhausting, throw one of those bad boys in the microwave and be eating within minutes. Not the best, but better than getting fast food or just eating a sandwich when I don’t have the energy to cook.

  • Regna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Go by the study. And then if there are other studies, look at the combination of them. Ignore the articles speculations, they do not undermine a study that was supposed to look at “how much micro and nano particles of plastics are released and we’re subjected to when microwaving food in plastic containers”.

  • ogmemuk@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    From the abstract of the original paper:

    The results indicated that microwave heating caused the highest release of microplastics and nanoplastics into food compared to other usage scenarios, such as refrigeration or room-temperature storage.

    Why on earth didn’t they compare a different heating scenario? What kind of science is that? The take is not “microwave is bad”, it’s actually “Some plastics are bad, and worse when heated”.

  • Oograh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What kind of psycho microwaves plastic anyway? Even if it isn’t releasing potentially toxic crap, the plastic gets hotter than the food. I’m not risking my hand melting off for a crappy Hot Pocket.

    • Rhaedas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some do, some don’t. Some ceramics get hot enough to crack, while others don’t heat at all. It depends on the material the container is made of.

    • Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rubbermaid plastic containers microwave brilliantly and have steam escapes but prevent splashing and they are the same things used to store in the fridge so there’s no transfering involved. I don’t find that they get all that hot either.

  • Anamana@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    there is already enough evidence to show that “microwave-safe plastic” isn’t really safe. “I think the FDA needs to tell companies that they can no longer say any plastic is microwavable,” says Enck.

    So it was marketing all along