• mox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12330 days ago

    users of apps with a communication function would have to agree via terms and conditions or pop-up messages that all images and videos sent to others will be scanned automatically and possibly reported to the EU and the police.

    This is more like coercion than consent.

    And let’s be clear: The goal of legislation like this is not to allow investigating child abusers, which can already be done legally. The goal is to impose mass surveillance on the population, circumventing due process.

        • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          729 days ago

          If you have Internet it uses tor and there’s no main server to rely on.

          If there’s no Internet it can use Bluetooth and Wi-Fi locally.

          • @Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            128 days ago

            Well I have to admit, those are some pretty snazzy tricks…

            Using tor on a per app basis is pretty cool, I wonder what the security implications are for that? If some, but not all of your traffic is going through tor, I wonder if it’s easier to disentangle somehow… Probably it’s still secure though.

      • @Audalin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        229 days ago

        Very cool and impressive, but I’d rather be able to share arbitrary files.

        And looks like you can only send images in DMs, but not in groups/forums.

      • @EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        128 days ago

        I am just sad that the desktop version is not as full-featured. The website says no Tor bridges, which here means no Tor connectivity at all. And it is weird that the mailbox is primarily for phones, even though phones are not supposed to be working permanently on a charger - they do have a cli one at least so you’s probably be able to use something like a Raspberry instead, for now only buildable from source but hope it develops. But yea, very cool model! Although I would say for everyday less sensitive communication I would choose XMPP or Matrix instead.

    • ɐɥO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      329 days ago

      this could finally be a good “reason” to convice some people near me to get into meshtastic

    • Beaver
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2030 days ago

      They’re probably gonna put parents behind bars for a misunderstanding on their private lives

    • applepie
      link
      fedilink
      530 days ago

      Catholic clergy is sill grifting around this here country…

  • @archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3730 days ago

    If consent mattered, governments and corporations all around the world wouldn’t be pushing to expand the global surveillance apparatus.

    Is this just another Tuesday now? Fuck me.

  • @uebquauntbez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1328 days ago

    I’d vote for testing this mass chat control on politicians and CEOs of the companies that want this mass control. Let’s say for the next 10 years? Or 20? Pretty sure the results will be great. For people, for justice, for democracy.

  • @barryamelton@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Even if you don’t opt in, 99% of the people you interact with would have opted in. So you will monitored as they please.

  • @Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    628 days ago

    As if any chat systems inteded for dubious purposes in the darknet would give a flying f-ck about this law.