Video game studios are so scared of AI they’re offering $7K bonusus for AI ideas::They’re forcing employees to study machine learning and offering $7,000 bounties for A.I. ideas: ‘Every week, we feel that we are going to be eliminated’

  • PancakeLegend@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you sure this indicates fear? AI is going to be majorly disruptive, so they’re educating and incentivising their staff to be the disruptors. This is not a bad way to set yourself up for the future.

  • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why? Imagine NPCs that are powered by AI? No longer would they repeat the same story about their knees or stare blankly while you ransack their houses. Imagine AI powered opponents in Stellaris or RTS games.

    • DogsShouldRuleUs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same as procedurally generated world’s. Doomed to be boring and generic because they lack the human touch. I’ve seen AI dialogue games and they’re pretty laughable. “I’m sorry I did not understand that query.” Wow it’s like I’m talking to a real human!

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean procedurally generated worlds didnt stop minecraft from being one of the top selling games of all time…

    • Xiaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Funny part is, an MMO has already died because of this premise. EverQuest NEXT was going to use a foundational system called Storybricks that would generate a living story for the world, in real time, using AI for the npcs, quests, zone events. That worked so well that the MMO half of EQN got cancelled and turned into a weird, plot based, EQ styled version of Minecraft that never got to full release.

    • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the NPC is so trivial and what they say is so unimportant to the story that it can just be randomly generated, then it sounds like that NPC only exists to waste my time.

      • Rooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sometimes you need background NPCs to give the illusion of a living, breathing world, in the same way movies have extras in the background to fill a scene.

    • bbbbb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      From the workers perspective, I know a lot of people are scared because tools like mid journey can replace, e.g. concept artists. Not sure why a studio would be scared

    • brsrklf@compuverse.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      IMO having AI dialogue is only going to make it generic and possibly inconsistent between characters or with the lore the game is trying to set up.

      Maybe not too big a deal for a sandbox-y experimental kind of game, but terrible for a story-driven one. Some stuff is better written.

  • WagnasT@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only thing to fear from AI is bots like OP clogging up my feed with nonsense. They’re embracing AI, they can make speech more natural, generate zillions of textures for terrain or clothes or particle effects. Maybe they’ll even start to generate sounds so the hack n slash is not the exact same noise. They can even let AI create side quests or random events that don’t feel forced. I use arch btw.

  • mawkishdave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have confidence that any large company will figure out many new ways to use AI to screw over people.