A tiny, low-priced electric car called the Seagull has American automakers and politicians trembling.

The car, launched last year by Chinese automaker BYD, sells for around $12,000 in China, but drives well and is put together with craftsmanship that rivals U.S.-made electric vehicles that cost three times as much. A shorter-range version costs under $10,000.

Tariffs on imported Chinese vehicles probably will keep the Seagull away from America’s shores for now, and it likely would sell for more than 12 grand if imported.

But the rapid emergence of low-priced EVs from China could shake up the global auto industry in ways not seen since Japanese makers exploded on the scene during the oil crises of the 1970s. BYD, which stands for “Build Your Dreams,” could be a nightmare for the U.S. auto industry.

“Any car company that’s not paying attention to them as a competitor is going to be lost when they hit their market,” said Sam Fiorani, a vice president at AutoForecast Solutions near Philadelphia. “BYD’s entry into the U.S. market isn’t an if. It’s a when.”

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    6 months ago

    A tiny, low-priced electric car called the Seagull has American automakers and politicians trembling.

    Hyperbole as rhetorical device is getting exhausting and makes me extremely skeptical.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    6 months ago

    a threat to US auto industry? You promise? Cus US auto industry is a climate killing powerhouse of gas guzzling SUV’s. Any politicians wanting to pretend to be capitalist, or to be in favor of the environment, let me buy this car.

    • interrobang
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      No one i know under 50 years old wants a giant truck or suv, and thats all they wanna sell us. My only friends with new car $ bought a small wagon, which is all I’d want myself.

      Those huge electric pickups are too heavy for our guardrails on top of everything else; it’s insane and dangerous to let the big three make car culture here even worse.

      • LowtierComputer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        I know so many boomers with fucking monster vehicles. Even my car nut friends daily drive sedans and small EV’s. We’re not idiots or rich.

        • Ozone6363@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          We’re not idiots or rich

          So poor people drive smaller, cheaper cars. Got it.

          You’re just in different circles, I suppose.

          • LowtierComputer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think you’re reading into it the wrong way buddy.

            I don’t have the money for a big car and don’t need one. Taking out a massive loan just to have a big car would be idiotic.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        No one i know under 50 years old wants a giant truck or suv

        Where could we even park them if we did? My garage barely fits the two sedans my wife and I need to get to work on opposite sides of town, in a city with functionally no mass transit.

        I might not mind owning a single SUV if I used it exclusively for long trips and as a make-shift camping van. But I simply do not have the acreage in my postage-stamp lot size of a three-story walk-up to host more than that. Not that some of my neighbors don’t try, clogging all the sidewalks and curb spaces with their monster trucks.

      • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        Then you just don’t know many people. Or live in a bubble. I see people in their twenties driving trucks in the richest city in my state known for being a hyper liberal college town.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      If dealerships refuse to sell EVs, what can be done?

      Direct sales, which is becoming increasingly popular in a car market where dealership market ups price people out of purchases.

      Especially in states where cars can only be sold from licensed dealerships?

      We’ll see how long that lasts. Dealerships are the last great American petty aristocracy in a business environment that’s increasingly all about absolute monarchies. Tesla has already been lobbying hard to overturn the ban on direct sales in Texas, and is doing plenty to end-run the system in the meanwhile. Amazon would love to get into the automotive market (we’ll see where they go with their Rivian partnership). Silicon Valley hates these guys for getting in the way of their own drop shipping schemes. And its just a matter of time before the dam bursts.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Amazon is not a manufacturer. They should be able to act as a dealer and the only problem being all the different paperwork for all the different states

  • shininghero@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t see a problem here. If the US auto makers are so worried, they should buy a few of them, copy their secrets, and sell them at a marked down price.
    Turnabout is fair play, after all.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      6 months ago

      They’d prefer to sell you a giant SUV or truck with massive profit margins and so they can continue to flout emissions standards.

      • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        6 months ago

        Don’t forget our big three are just chomping at the bit to get in on the subscription model. Oh, you want ‘good’ brakes, well that’s $19.99/month. And there’s no ‘secrets’ to the chinese cars, I am willing to bet that they are just selling them at a loss. It’s not like they have to report real earnings to anyone.

        • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          6 months ago

          They are just trying to kill the entire car industry. Which, at this point I could give a shit about. Car manufacturer seem to think that a car should be an investment… Except it depreciates.

          Personally I’m not sure I would want that car as my only vehicle because I only have space for one car, but if I get a bigger place with a two car garage I would definitely be interested in a small electric car that doesn’t break my budget. I would probably use it 1/5 trips.

        • RandomGen1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          I saw an article somewhere on lemmy recently that had some commentary from an American tear-down r&d type shop that said they think BYD makes a small profit on them

          • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            Very interesting. But the cynic in me says that even if we could tear it down and learn from it, we would manage to negate the savings with other costs. If they are making a profit, even if it’s tiny, that would still negate the tin foil hat people from being able to say they are just using them in infiltrate our nation with their spying and devious ways. Well one would think, but tin foil hat people will find a way to work around that, because what’s the best way to hide that you are infiltrating our nation then making it look like you are making a tiny profit. (Taps forehead…)

        • vividspecter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Right, but it’s easier to continue to flout those standards than to build a high quality and affordable EV, with comparable profit margins. And the marketing is easier (“You’re not a real man without this giant truck!”).

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            They are a threat when they’re sold well below cost due to the Chinese government’s massive subsidies which make it impossible for any other non-Chinese manufacturer in the world to compete with them.

              • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yeah just like they want cheap products when Walmart comes to town and before too long the local economy is in the crapper as all the town’s revenue gets funneled to Arkansas.

                What you’re advocating for is a race to the bottom just so you can buy one (maybe two!) new car(s) instead of an affordable used car like most people do. Let China sell their cars here with the same subsidies that every other company qualifies for on a level playing field.

        • interrobang
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          Buyers do not want them, at least not anymore

          They’ve been saying that axing the small sedan was to put money into EV. Seems they lied to pocket it, but we get nothing because free market capitalism is bullshit.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            That article simply states the sales of the Dodge Ram and Ford F150 were down last quarter and makes no mention of any other segment or manufacturer. Dodge hasn’t made a small sedan since 2016 and Ford hasn’t made one since 2020

    • draughtcyclist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Someone has to pay for the R&D to make EV’s possible. So far, that’s not BYD. It’s been US and European countries.

    • TomSelleck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem is the companies in China are backed by government funding that allows them to operate at a loss. To be clear, no governments should be spending public funds on propping up automotive companies. It’s a move to try and manipulate the market.

      • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 months ago

        The problem is the companies in China are backed by government funding that allows them to operate at a loss.

        So are the Big Three, every time they fail to see what’s in front of their noses and get into trouble.

        • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          And they are setup for another fail right now, nothing but suvs on their lots and realistically gas has nowhere to go but up again.

          Should’ve let them fall last time instead of the big bailouts.

      • A7thStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        If that were actually the case wouldn’t we want them sold here at a loss so we could drain resources from the Chinese government.

  • m13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    6 months ago

    Americans forced the world into the capitalist system, and now they don’t like it when China does capitalism. Why are they so afraid of the free market?

    • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Except it’s not capitalism when China does it, it’s socialism. The EV manufacturers like BYD have had massive subsidies from the state to bring those products to market, and that level of state support and intervention is not palatable to Americans.

      Political, Climate change and National Security concerns aside, the subsidies are how the US government are about to justify the tariffs.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        6 months ago

        So are massive subsidies only socialism when China does it?

        The US has been doing that for decades.

        • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          yes but then the US doesn’t expect to sell huge quantities of its cars in China and upset the market. Nor would China permit that.

          • Wogi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            6 months ago

            They not only sell huge quantities of cars in China, they export new and used cars to China for sale.

            They’re not upsetting the market because they’re already a huge part of it.

            Upsetting the market is generally good for consumers. Why exactly would you want to lick the boots of American auto manufacturers when they’re actively price gouging in the absence of any competition?

      • moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 months ago

        We can talk about the massive subsidies the US government did and do to the automakers. The propaganda paid with tax money to have a centered car environment.

        Each country subsidies its automaker but doesn’t want the other to do so because “Free market™”. It’s at best hypocrite.

  • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s easy to build a cheap car when you ignore the human rights of your workers and the environmental damage of your production process.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lol western nations dint give a fuck about that. They just externalized the environmental costs to China and other poor nations until now and then sold the end result to their customers. The only problem is that that US doesn’t own the company.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ford when they outsourced to South Africa during their apartheid for cheap exploit labor

      All 3 American automakers who already outsourced to Mexico right now to do the exact same thing

      Yellen telling China to scale back eco tech production to protect American profits

      Ah yes America, the global leader in human rights and environmental protection.

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      Or our businesses don’t want this type of competition? An affordable and reliable sub 10k EV? This would hurt our businesses and billionaire class, no?

      If I needed a new car, and had a 10k EV as an option, it’d be my first choice to look into.

      Por que no los dos, though.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Our businesses can’t compete because we don’t want poison in our air/water, cars made with child labor, or factories that regularly maim or kill employees.

        • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s okay when we do it because our factories at least looks clean and modern despite all that shit happening anyway.

            • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Translation: I’ve brought into the idea that america is the best and therfore without any evidence I’ll assume that every bad thing that happens is worse in China.

              It’s weird that people acknowledge china has made huge investments in modernizing industry while america has not but then act like investing trillions in high tech manifacturing has changed nothing and the country is still just guys in pointy straw hats scratching at the dirt.

              Go look at the dji factory, it’s a beautifully elegant engineering masterpiece as or more advanced than any western factory. The design is efficient, robust, and retoolable with workers getting good wages and a range of benefits that rival or exceed similar employment in Europe or the US, most working 9-5 in good safe conditions with adequate breaks.

              MiC25 the project to invest in and promote Chinese tech manifacturing is reaching maturity and exactly what was intended and expected is happening. The lesson should be that investing in infrastructure and modernization is a great idea but instead people want to dismiss that and say ‘no surely things are always better here in the west where the only investments we make are bailing out the rich every time they fuck up’

              Yes china has a lot of problems like any county, just assuming that everything they do is evil and terrible makes no sense.

              • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I don’t think America is the best either, just less bad than China in most cases.

                still just guys in pointy straw hats scratching at the dirt.

                As of 2023, 40% of the Chinese workforce is engaged in farming, primarily at the small scale. Your racist implications aside, a large portion of the country is still relatively undeveloped.

                China executes more than 1000 people every year, sometimes for things which are protected rights in the US like political dissidence (aka free speech). They are the #1 country in numbers of executions. They kill more people than the next 10 countries on the list combined.

                China is the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases; the largest source of marine debris; the worst perpetrators of illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing; and the world’s largest consumer of trafficked wildlife and timber products.

                The Chinese government regularly spies on its own citizens, censors what their citizens know, and manipulates them with propaganda.

                China has 5 times the workforce as the US but 16 times the workplace fatality rate. More than 225 Chinese people die from workplace accidents.

                China regularly holds more than 1 million people in internment camps. In these camps many are abused, tortured, raped, or used as slave labor. That is on top of the 1.7 million people in the penal system where torture is regularly used as punishment.

                But yeah, they have one or two nice looking factories.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          Ελληνικά
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          Our businesses can’t compete because we spent the last 30 years outsourcing all of our manufacturing and production to cut cost.

          Look at the rivers here and tell me with a straight face that we give a meaningful pity fuck about the environment.

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Do you have any idea how bad the rivers used to be? A river outside Cleveland used to catch on fire and a river in Chicago used to bubble due to all the rotting slaughterhouse runoff.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Problem is, that goes for expensive cars as well.

      At some point we need to decide are we in the West are either (a) importing cheap small cars from China, or (b) stopping poor people from driving. Because petrol is on the way out.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s why ebikes and scooters are becoming so popular. Small short range mobility vehicles are filling the gap.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think that’s the key tbh. Most people aren’t going to need a massive car for going about town. Just something that can carry your shopping and get you to work and back will do.

          • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I just wish I didn’t have to choose between a small car and a car that won’t get stuck in the snow. I don’t know why they think small cars must also have a small ground clearance.

    • Ozone6363@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The car still sucks ass, dude. Literally no one is buying cheap Chinese shit that has a million problems. They’re not even close.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Drive it over the border from Mexico. Although, you’ll likely have to pay above the sticker price. Latin Americans are gobbling up Chinese NEVs as fast as they can deliver them.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I don’t know if the laws have changed but (for some reason I forget), a dealership here imported two three-wheeled small pickup trucks from China within the last decade or so. So it was at least possible within the recent past somehow.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        6 months ago

        Those are just excuses:

        • Dumping: US auto industry is enjoying significant protectionism right now, with the excuse of combatting dumping. They have a grace period to catch up, but instead they’re backing off, retreating into their shells. We’re spending hundreds of billions of dollars to give them a chance to compete fairly and they’re throwing it away. I’ll have sympathy if they at least try.
        • Surveillance: US auto industry and especially EVs are horrible with surveillance right now. You not only have no privacy, they commonly have cameras inside and can control your vehicle remotely. Those Chinese surveillance devices aren’t doing anything different from anyone else: they’re all violating our privacy and we have no protection. It’s not that I’m not afraid of Chinese surveillance devices but that I’m also afraid of US corporate surveillance devices. Let a have some actual privacy protections we can apply equally and fairly to all of them
        • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Those are just excuses

          They might be used as excuses by a complacent industry, but they are not just excuses. They are also valid reasons for concern, and would still be so even if not used as talking points for Detroit lobbyists.

          US auto industry is enjoying significant protectionism right now

          Regardless of that, China’s government has spent more than a few years subsidizing products and services in order to make their exports dirt cheap abroad, eventually making other nations dependent on them. (See also: the Belt and Road Initiative.) This fits the same pattern, and would still be a problem even if US auto industry protectionism didn’t exist.

          US auto industry and especially EVs are horrible with surveillance right now.

          Agreed, but once again, that doesn’t invalidate the problem that I mentioned. A foreign adversary having deep, real-time access to the nation’s infrastructure, traffic patterns, sensitive information revealed through conversations and cameras, etc. is a larger problem than the personal privacy issues that already exist domestically.

          Chinese surveillance devices aren’t doing anything different from anyone else: they’re all violating our privacy and we have no protection.

          The difference lies in where the collected information goes. That might not matter to some people on a personal level, but on a national scale, handing all that info to an adversary nation is cause for concern.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 months ago

            As opposed to them buying it from data brokers? There’s a difference in responsiveness and I’m sure data brokers make a pretense of anonymizing that will need a bit of adjustment, but I’m not convinced it’s as different as everyone is afraid of

            • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              As opposed to them buying it from data brokers?

              That would also be a cause for concern. Both should be addressed.

      • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Those are probably both totally relevant points but it’s not going to matter because everyone’s suffering so much from inflation that they’ll go ahead and take the bait and buy it anyway. Even those that are aware of the intentional nature of the dumping and aware of the risks of surveillance won’t be able to responsibly buy a car that cost $60,000 when they can get one for 12k.

        • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          everyone’s suffering so much from inflation that they’ll go ahead

          That, along with a bloated auto industry and terribly underdeveloped public transit. Here’s hoping this turn of events will lead to real progress in fixing these problems.

  • Darkscryber@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 months ago

    A electric car that is not a SUV? I am in!!! Here in Canada the only option for EV are Prius and SUV. No small EV car under 20k. I say bring them on!! Otherwise I will continue to buy juices from arabian country.

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    The Big Three have already had Biden’s ear for a while on this, which is why he’s quadrupling tariffs on Chinese EVs this week. Source

    • Daveyborn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      What? The big three are trying to rig the game in their favor again? I’m very surprised! …not really, it’s business as usual from them.

  • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I don’t want a Chinese car but at the same time if American automakers are going to continue refusing to make affordable electric cars and only give massive SUVs and trucks as our gas options then it seems like that’s pretty much the choice we’ll be left with.

    Edit: if this frightens the Biden administration then they need to find a way to put pressure on American manufacturers to make some decent vehicles.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m really not a fan of China, but I’m inclined to agree. We need smaller, more affordable vehicles. SUVs are antiquated, and trucks are largely decorative for most of the population. We need smaller, lighter vehicles. Though we also should be investing much more into mass transit rather than (largely redundant) highways and roads anyways, as it’s a huge waste of taxpayer money. Keep the key highways, build rail to reduce reliance on shit we shouldn’t really be rebuilding anyways. A lot of highways are going to be hitting the end of their useful lives soon, anyways, and require rebuilds.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 months ago

      and are only sold in China are no threat to anything.

      The export model, the Dolphin Mini, is expected in Europe in 2025.

        • Windex007@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 months ago

          Are you suggesting that there is a material difference of minimal testing standard between the EU and the USA?

          • Halosheep@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Capital interests might have something to say about it in the US. No way they’re letting the government allow those in.

        • The Uncanny Observer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          California is the largest economy in the United States, and one of the largest in the world. It’s also the one with the largest market for EVs in the US. As an added bonus, it’s very conveniently positioned on the west coast, with easy access to shipping lanes from China. And finally, it’s probably the state that’s least likely to care if a US auto maker on the other side of the nation is struggling. Only fifteen states in the US require inspections, and California isn’t one of them. In fact, the only state that isn’t on the east coast that requires an inspection is Texas. All other states have nothing but emissions tests, if that, and any EV would be excluded from those, for obvious reasons.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I would say no at the prices they’re selling for in China. The crackdown is due to the massive subsidies being pumped into these manufacturers by the Chinese government which would make it impossible for any other manufacturer to compete with them since they’re selling them below cost.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      This may surprise you but US manufacturers count on a lot of income from selling outside the US. They’re all global conglomerates. Even looking through your roses colored glasses, do you really think legacy manufacturers will do well when they lose all of their global sales?

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      I look at both sides here, where every new vehicle has a chip that tell the auto makers just about everything about you … but cheap, well-made EVs should be available to the average Joe, not just the wealthy.

      What pisses me off the most is the Big Three have gotten billions in subsidies/corporate welfare, and instead of creating cheap EVs to fill the market they build gas-guzzling SUVs and full-sized trucks for $60k+ per.

        • girlfreddy@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          My son refuses to buy a new vehicle. He says the old ones run better and he’s able to fix them himself, which offsets the cost of maintaining any new vehicle.

          • FirstCircle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I refuse as well, and will continue to refuse, at least until my 1997 and 2005 vehicles can no longer be repaired for some reason. I’d love some EV tech but the idea of driving a Big Brother vehicle that’s fender-to-fender loaded with spyware and “features” that can only be enabled via subscriptions is horrifying and dystopian. Also forget all the Big Screen distractions inside and all the self-driving antifeatures. At least 1/2 of my driving is done for pleasure and I expect to be focusing on the road and what’s happening around me.

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        They have to sell cars. I hear the EV F-150 is selling like shit despite all the interest online, which really disappoints me. I couldn’t be happier with my Chevy Volt (other than it’s too low to the ground for my body to comfortably climb in and out of) and many would say it’s the best PHEV - or at least was for its time. The Bolt consistently ranks very highly among EVs. I absolutely disagree that American car manufacturers are dropping the ball here. They are trying to figure out how to make and sell these cars to consumers who have made clear they want trucks and SUVs with the cargo/passenger capacity for trips.

        Cost of labor is higher here, but not nearly enough to explain this price difference (and is anyone suggesting we shouldn’t pay autoworkers good wages?). Something doesn’t add up. Corners have to have been cut to create an EV half the cost of everyone else. I welcome fair competition to help drive prices down, but I’ll wait to see what happens. I’m super skeptical of any miracle solution, particularly when the verbiage about it has such an emotionally charged tone.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Chevy Volt … Bolt consistently ranks very highly among EVs. I absolutely disagree that American car manufacturers are dropping the ball here.

          They’re not dropping the ball, they’re throwing it away. You’re giving two examples that have been our best hope for affordable EVs but are no longer made

          • MagicShel@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Well, that’s a fair point. The Bolt is being replaced by an EV version of the Equinox, which I like better for the crossover size factor, but I suspect it won’t hit quite the same as the Bolt.

            No replacement for the Volt, though. Which kinda sucks, though it wasn’t a cheap market car by any means. I think mine was 35k new and I didn’t spring for the fancy version.

  • ansiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve seen enough QA issues with most of the Chinese EVs I would highly doubt any of them make it to the USA for consumer sale at any scale. Some have overheating issues, panels fall off, cheap seat belts, uncomfortable seats, sizing issues (too small for larger Americans), goofy AC vents that blow weak when pointed downward and high when pointed at your face but don’t allow for other adjustments.

    • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      BYD has been making buses and work trucks for the US market for years. I’ve only had a ride on a few BYD buses, but they seem to be quality.

      • ChewTiger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Good to hear they’ve had some success in the US, but I do worry about the quality of their consumer products. Too many companies can’t translate success in onr section of a market into another section.

        I really want a small EV.

    • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean at those prices you don’t expect too much quality. Unlike Teslas that are poorly built but priced like the aren’t

    • rowinxavier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree with many of these points, but have two thoughts here. First, the same was true of many items being produced in China in the past, but quality control got better and honestly most of the products you can buy for a reasonable price are partly or wholly made in China. Second, Tesla is a good example of a US based company with many of the same issues. Loose panels, door handles that fall off, accelerators that get stuck, and so on. Bad engineering is not only available in Mandarin.

      I hope they can produce a good quality electric car and help accelerate the transition.

    • Ozone6363@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      1000% this.

      This article is fuckin ridiculous. There hasn’t been a Chinese auto manufacturer that is even CLOSE.