• SeaOtter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Interesting data, but I don’t think it is beautifully presented. Bar charts, or maybe a blown up pie charts may be easier to grasp the scale.

    Blobs of the largely same color, dispersed in a random pattern make it hard to quickly see scale

  • MrNemobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    A bit confusing. Normal circumferences or a bar graph would be much more informative and easier to compare.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    What sucks is that wild animals used to be everywhere! You could walk into a forest and easily see dozens of animals. But most of them have been killed off from over hunting in the 19th century and environment encroachment.

    • notapantsday@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, in a lot of places it has become really hard to find the thing that was considered a forest a few hundred years ago. All we have now in Germany are spruce or pine plantations where the only animals you can find are ants.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You guys don’t have forest land anymore? That is an absolute tragedy! I’m really sorry to hear that for you guys. I have to get to the wilderness at least once every couple of months or I lose my mind. I get super stressed out, claustrophobic, and depressed. Spending a weekend in the wilderness is a much needed reset. Thank goodness for Teddy Roosevelt’s National Park programs and general land conservation efforts here in the US.

        • notapantsday@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          We have a few national parks, but they’re not nearly as big or as old as the ones in the US. And there are no more native forests, every one of them has been man made at some point. Within national parks and some other areas, they’re trying to let nature take over again but it’s a slow process. In one national park (Harz) they’ve stopped trying to save the spruce trees that were never supposed to be there, and they’re all dying from drought, climate change and bark beetles:

          https://assets.deutschlandfunk.de/403b1645-9795-4a2c-ad31-43f00c903cb5/1920x1080.jpg

          I’m sure something better adapted to the conditions will come in after the spruce is gone, but it’s a work in progress.

        • Smatt@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Teddy Roosevelt’s National Park programs

          Imagine the uproar if that was a new idea now. People would hate it as the most “socialist”, anti-business, outlandish concept. You just conserve it? And you can’t build strip mall parking lots and gas stations all over it?!?

  • blackbrook@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is good, but presenting the blobs as such different shapes makes it harder to get a sense of relative size. (Obviously some of the differences are huge enough it doesn’t matter, but comparing humans and cattle say.)

    And which blob is chickens? I guess chickens are so much smaller and lighter than other domestic animals they don’t show very big here.

  • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that the wild animals aren’t labeled but are broken up makes me extremely confused. Also what are all the unlabeled pets blocks supposed to be?

  • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does this type of illustration exist with a comparison between humans and various insects? I think that would be really interesting.