• Eyedust@lemmy.world
    44·
    7 months ago

    Story time.

    I learned Debian-based distros back in high school from a college tech class. After leaving school and getting my first job, I built my first computer (after two DOA boards and much gnashing of teeth). I sat happily in my Windows bubble for a long time.

    Years later I had a catastrophic failure when trying to get clever and unlocking my system32 folder to do some tinkering. I’d had enough of Windows. Thought Pop! OS looked really nice.

    But we sometimes have that one friend. Arch. Every time I talked about my OS or showed him my clean setup, Arch. If I had a problem with packages. Pacman. AUR. Arch.

    I was going nuts. Did he care I was running Pop! OS with KDE Plasma using Kubuntu backports to jury rig a later version? No. Arch.

    After a long and grueling battle, after slogging through mountains of unsolicited Arch memes in my DMs, after vehemently defending Debian, I will only say this:

    I use Arch, btw.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.mlEnglish
    37·
    7 months ago

    I think we’re years past the point where the frequency of memes about people saying “I use arch btw” has exceeded people actually saying “I use arch btw” by a wide margin. At this point I’m just waiting for this one to die.

  • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlEnglish
    27·
    7 months ago

    Maybe better to use cross-post next time. Sometimes people do not cross-post and then the same link will appear five times in the time line for the five identical posts they made. With cross-posting it appears only once. I use Arch, btw

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    21·
    7 months ago

    Controversial opinion: you become a senior, when you let arch behind and use distros like debian.

    I don’t dislike arch, going step by step through the install process is the best way learning and no matter which distro someone use, the arch wiki should be the first place to visit for instructions or help.

    • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
      17·
      7 months ago

      I don’t know, I have had to fix more problems with supposedly “stable” distributions like Debian and co than I ever did with arch.

    • Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
      7·
      7 months ago

      I disagree (a bit at least).

      Debian is just as prone to breaking due to the lack of fallbacks (e.g. Snapper), it just doesn’t break as often because it doesn’t change as much as Arch.
      If you use a minimal/ default install, this won’t happen as easily, but as soon as you customise anything, you get problems.
      Arch can be reliable too, there are many people who have had the same install for years without breaking.

      I would actually recommend Fedora Atomic or other image based distros, e.g. VanillaOS.
      They can be more modern, while being way more reliable thanks to atomic updates/ transactions, complete image rollbacks and the reproducibility.
      They are a dream to use imo!

      • Samsy@lemmy.ml
        1·
        7 months ago

        This is the way. Everyone can use what satisfies them. My arch experience was good, too. But after tinkering confs and setups, I lost my spirit to become a Unixporn user.

        Nowadays I want easy to use setups. That’s why I use debian for servers and fedora for clients. Last week I saved an old laptop from a friend before being e-waste. Fedora atomic was the chosen one and he is really happy with it so far.

      • KnoLord@lemmy.world
        9·
        7 months ago

        It is, if your priorities are to tinker even more with your computer. (nix configs, etc.) :)

        Using non-tech analogy, it is like having a “project car” to tinker with and a “daily driver” to get to and from work, if you are a car enthusiast.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          2·
          7 months ago

          Yes, but for example I find the steam deck actually buggier than NixOS

          Just look at all the posts about the “discover” app crashing

          • KnoLord@lemmy.world
            1·
            7 months ago

            But isn’t that behavior actually documented in the Arch wiki? At least when you manually install it, it lists packagekit-qt6 as being “not recommended”.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              1·
              7 months ago

              As far as I can tell, I’m just using it to install flatpaks so it should work fine

      • Norgur@fedia.io
        9·
        7 months ago

        I said I lt elsewhere already. The maturing “I use arch btw” crowd is steadily migrating to NixOS. In a few years at most .the meme will be “I use nixOS btw”.

  • NoFuckingWaynado@lemmy.world
    10·
    7 months ago

    My current theory on the whole meme:

    1. Someone in high school debate class is tasked with arguing in favor of Flat Earth theory or moon landings were faked.
    2. Intrigued by the ease with which they manipulate people into believing outlandish concepts, they try talking people into believing more untenable ideas like “grip tape is much better at holding reaper pepper hot sauce on the surface of a dildo than barbed wire.”
    3. Person finds that limits exist and tries to come up with something more reasonable – becomes champion for Arch Linux.
    4. People take them seriously and it takes off…

    DISCLAIMER: I have tried neither grip tape and hot sauce covered dildos nor Arch Linux but you get the concept I’m trying to convey I hope.

    • Norgur@fedia.io
      8·
      7 months ago

      Give it a few years and the I use nixOS memes will replace the Arch ones completely.

  • recapitated@lemmy.world
    7·
    7 months ago

    The crow is people making fun of using arch. Becaus the phrase “I use arch btw” is said orders of magnitude more by those people.