Note that this represents who extracted, rather than who burned. Responsibility for burning fossil fuels is much more broadly distributed.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Thanks for the comment OP. We can hardly blame the companies we consume from.

    Think of these megacorps as organisms. They’re made up of people, like cells. Some of those cells specialize, turn into organs. Some organs direct the beast, most are merely support. The overarching goal is to survive and grow.

    They’re not taking so much as we are giving. WE ARE THE FOOD.

    Do everything you can to stop feeding the beast. After all, the beast is only doing what’s natural.

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      We 100% can blaim them. Those companies activly block alternatives and try to destroy them. They put massive resources in lobbying, PR and so forth for that very purpose, while knowing full well what is going on in terms of climate change. They even transformed our political systems, to allow them to pollute for longer. We have the technology to go fully away from fossil fuels for decades and it keeps getting better. These companies are the reason we have not deployed more of them.

      Obviously starving them is a good path, but I want to stab them too. We have to stop extracting and we have to stop consuming. Both has to happen and right now.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Am I reading this correctly? The headline sounds misleading. 80% of fossil fuel and cement GHGs, which is all the linked database appears to track. It doesn’t touch on other industries or contextualize what portion of total GHGs come from those industries (obviously a lot, but how much?)