They don’t have a brain really and kinda just float there. Do they even feel pain?

  • simplecyphers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, yeah. Im also being pedantic with unqualified absolutes.

    The fact remains sometimes it absolutely is ethical to kill stuff, even if they don’t want to die.

    My general ethical foundation is based on my conscience saying “that would be bad” or “seems ok”. I fully admit that this is potentially a personal flaw, but I don’t feel bad about eating meat. I have a vague sense of guilt for the treatment of meaty animals, but honestly, it isn’t enough to offset the convenience of a burger.

    Tldr sometimes its ethically okay to kill stuff, and I’m too lazy to do anything about benefitting from the majority of times when it isn’t ethical.

    • Applejuicy@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I respect the self-reflection in this comment. Sadly, I also feel a small need to ask you to think about ethics and morality slightly deeper. Imagine if your predecessors made similar comments about [insert moral failing of history]. How would you think about that?

      I think most of us try to be good people, but it’s really hard to do the right thing if you never think about what is right and why (and yes, sometimes that includes not being lazy).

      • simplecyphers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is an assumption here that i don’t think of right and wrong. Which isn’t true, as evidenced by this entire comment chain. My morality is based off of my conscience, and it has a final say in how i act. But I still think and explore ethically difficult situations to determine what is right, wrong, or grayish.

        I just didnt describe my entire ethical schema, because, as i said i am lazy. Lazy and self-aware enough to know that there is not much i can or will do to improve the morality of meat consumption. And honestly, that specific problem is pretty low on my list of ethical dilemmas. But it’s fun to talk about.

        • Applejuicy@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Rereading the chain I see misread the original comments, my bad.

          Lazy and self-aware enough to know that there is not much i can or will do to improve the morality of meat consumption.

          You can stop eating meat? That seems to be a fix that puts you squarely into better moral territory. Unless you think the killing, torturous treatment and rape is moral. It’s your choice whether you want to do something, but it I object to the word can here.

          In general, just having conscience as a guiding ethical compass leaves you open to many logical inconsistencies. Would you agree?

          • simplecyphers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I wouldnt completely agree. I think using something other than your conscience is somewhat disingenuous. For the most part, any inconsistencies have been from personal growth/change. I live my life so that i can sleep at night.

            As far as stopping meat consumption. Yes that is something that i can do. I believe the moral implications of doing that are minimal, simply because animals and humans have different ethical considerations. But this is getting off topic.

            I claimed there wasn’t much i could do to improve the morality of meat consumption (ie Ethical living conditions, reduced scale etc.) . It’s like i wanted to make cars more fuel efficient and you told me to ride a bike. It sidesteps the claim and proves a point i wasn’t arguing.

            I as a single person, with limited time and limited funds can’t change how large companies mass butcher livestock, not without sacrificing other things i value more.