Kyle Rittenhouse abruptly departed the stage during an appearance at the University of Memphis on Wednesday, after he was confronted about comments made by Turning Point USA founder and president Charlie Kirk.

Rittenhouse was invited by the college’s Turning Point USA chapter to speak at the campus. However, the event was met with backlash from a number of students who objected to Rittenhouse’s presence.

The 21-year-old gained notoriety in August 2020 when, at the age of 17, he shot and killed two men—Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, as well as injuring 26-year-old Gaige Grosskreutz—at a protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

He said the three shootings, carried out with a semi-automatic AR-15-style firearm, were in self-defense. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest where the shootings took place was held after Jacob Blake, a Black man, was left paralyzed from the waist down after he was shot by a white police officer.

  • @gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    403 months ago

    But he was acquitted

    Irrelevant.

    He’s famous for being a murderer, whether he was found guilty or not doesn’t matter.

    A bunch of people believe that he genuinely acted in legitimate self defense

    They’re stupid, simple as.

    • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      183 months ago

      Irrelevant.

      Murder is literally the illegal killing of someone. So yes it absolutely matters whether he was convicted. To claim it’s irrelevant that he was found not guilty of murder just exposes how detached from reality your position is. We can argue that he should have been found guilty, but you have to realize that the people who disagree with you don’t think he’s a murderer.

      They’re stupid, simple as.

      And I’ve heard plenty of them make the claim anyone who thinks he is a murderer is stupid. In this regard, you’re just like them.

      • @gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        253 months ago

        Murder is literally the illegal killing of someone

        Irrelevant. People know him as a murderer, thus that is what he is famous for. Plenty of people are famous for shit thats not technically accurate.

        but you have to realize that the people who disagree with you don’t think he’s a murderer.

        I do, I just don’t care what wrong people think about shit that’s basic and obvious.

        And I’ve heard plenty of them make the claim anyone who thinks he is a murderer is stupid. In this regard, you’re just like them.

        Yeah but those people are fucking stupid, so I wouldn’t listen to them.

        • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          153 months ago

          People know him as a murderer

          The people inviting him to speak seen him as a victim who acted in self defense. Which is the whole point of the question: he’s not a murder to them.

          Yeah but those people are fucking stupid, so I wouldn’t listen to them.

          It’s funny how exactly like them you are, and how stupid you think they are for it.

        • @Samueru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          People know him as a murderer

          I don’t, because I actually watch the damn trial

          shit that’s basic and obvious.

          Is it basic and obvious that you should just let be yourself attacked by a crowd even after trying to flee from said crowd instead of defending yourself?

    • DaBabyAteMaDingo
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      Killer and murder are not the same thing. You got access to the internet, right? I’ll give you some homework: figure out why they aren’t allowed to use the word “murderer(er)” in cases.