1. over time this might affect our collective consciousness in regards to the purpose & function of the eggplant; and

  2. can we please just get a straightforward penis emoji already?? Half the human population has a penis attached to their bodies anyway, why are we still so prude about incorporating actual penises into mainstream vernacular & daily life?

addendum:

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    7 months ago

    emoji are an all ages access thing

    Last time I checked, penises are an all ages thing too. But who knows, I’m no urologist.

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      They are an all ages thing for some… But remember when I said international? I don’t particularly like puritanical prudishness but the conservative held belief as those things being inappropriate for all points of society is also pretty common.

      I doubt those who keep the emoji want any hassle of the conservative European diaspora middle East, the Americas, facets of Africa and China getting their knickers in a twist.

      In the world of stockholder retaliation some things people count as just above their pay grade.

      • running_ragged@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Are there not already words to represent the same thing to anyone old enough to read a message? A different representation of something they are already potentially exposed to isn’t something that technology standards should be censoring.

        Especially when the defacto replacement for this is a symbol of something that could very easily give young men a serious sense of inadequacy and insecurity.

        edit: (you -> young)

        • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          I would countee that wouldn’t any single depiction of a penis set an unreasonable standard? Color, size, circumsized vs not etc? At least with a euphemism it is fairly abstract. I don’t think anyone looks at an eggplant as a goal.

          • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            There is already skin tone support for emoji. Size is not a problem because there is nothing to compare it to. Circumsized could be a separate emoji.

      • emptyother@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        They could include it. Give it a spot. But blank. And then it would be up to each OS if they want to include the icon on their device. That way we could at least let those less prudish nations and companies start with a common code point.

        Like flags for example. They got codepoints, but Microsoft has decided to not take sides and have ignored country’s flags.

        • kevincox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          The problem with leaving it blank is that it harms communication if the other party doesn’t have that symbol. You may send it because it exists in your country but then they have no idea what you mean.

          Maybe having a “tofu” missing character box is ok, but even then if a substantial amount of the world’s population isn’t going to have this character it maybe be best to leave it out.

          That being said, I am still in favour.