• milkytoast
    link
    fedilink
    66 months ago

    shit I could spend 10b of his money in record time! gimme 24 hours

    • @HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      146 months ago

      Would love to see someone actually try to spend 10b in 24 hours without nation level infrastructure.

      • milkytoast
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        nah I’d just give 1b each to like ten charities and call it a day

        I know I can’t actually spend 10b lol

      • @DavLemmyHav
        link
        26 months ago

        Thats like… three rtx 4090s right?

        • @qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          46 months ago

          The way I see it, Musk is only going to provide the investment if it fits into his investment portfolio strategy. With $2 billion, I would give $1 billion to charities, and the other $1 billion I would use to purchase as many American Southeastern coast beach houses as possible. I would sell the beach houses to climate denialists at half-off, instantly losing $500 million in the process. I’d keep the $500 million from the house sales to myself, because Musk knows that some money has to be kept to keep the lights on. The purchasers of the houses would slowly watch as their new investments into their houses literally goes into the ground (er, or oceans, as it is in this case).

          I figure Musk can’t resist an offer this good. My genius then continues to go unchallenged, except for Musk, who can somehow tank investments faster than this.

          • @pingveno@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 months ago

            The way I see it, Musk is only going to provide the investment if it fits into his investment portfolio strategy.

            Well, and sometimes barely even that. He was desperately shuffling around capital trying to pony up when Twitter called him on his overly generous offer to buy the company. He simply didn’t have enough liquid assets to do so.

          • @MumboJumbo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            16 months ago

            Don’t do it! Flood insurance is cheap because it’s subsidized by the US government. Those houses should be demolished.